Difference between revisions of "Stormwater planters"
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
<imagemap> | <imagemap> | ||
− | + | file:Stormwater Planter Updated compacted.png|thumb|450 px|Stormwater planter with impermeable membrane liner receiving roof and sidewalk runoff via trench drain. <span style="color:red">''A note: The following is an "image map", feel free to explore the image with your cursor and click on highlighted labels that appear to take you to corresponding pages on the Wiki.''</span> | |
+ | rect 718 2598 767 3057 [[Underdrains|Underdrain Access Structure]] | ||
+ | rect 1931 1137 2000 1216 [[Downspout disconnection|Roof Downspout]] | ||
+ | rect 1940 1796 2000 2703 [[Downspout disconnection|Roof Downspout]] | ||
+ | rect 293 1040 413 1322 [[Inlets]] | ||
+ | rect 1065 1055 1174 1324 [[Inlets]] | ||
+ | rect 217 1095 286 1289 [[Curb cut]] | ||
+ | rect 293 2736 467 2796 [[Inlets]] | ||
+ | rect 979 2740 1155 2794 [[Inlets]] | ||
+ | rect 1130 2678 1255 2734 [[Inlets]] | ||
+ | rect 288 1342 1168 1521 [[Graminoids:_List| Grasses]] | ||
+ | rect 291 314 477 1028 [[Graminoids:_List| Grasses]] | ||
+ | rect 489 309 1183 519 [[Graminoids:_List| Grasses]] | ||
+ | rect 1050 530 1179 1020 [[Graminoids:_List| Grasses]] | ||
+ | rect 700 1267 782 1351 [[Underdrains|Underdrain Access Structure]] | ||
rect 705 411 1013 1092 [[Shrubs: List|Shrubs]] | rect 705 411 1013 1092 [[Shrubs: List|Shrubs]] | ||
rect 753 2109 1028 2562 [[Shrubs: List|Shrubs]] | rect 753 2109 1028 2562 [[Shrubs: List|Shrubs]] | ||
rect 465 363 694 1149 [[Perennials: List| Perennials]] | rect 465 363 694 1149 [[Perennials: List| Perennials]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
rect 450 408 373 339 [[Overflow]] | rect 450 408 373 339 [[Overflow]] | ||
− | rect | + | rect 467 2740 985 2798 [[Mulch]] |
− | |||
rect 1053 870 1161 1146 [[Forebays]] | rect 1053 870 1161 1146 [[Forebays]] | ||
− | rect | + | rect 705 3059 774 3126 [[Underdrain]] |
rect 699 2416 752 2883 [[Overflow]] | rect 699 2416 752 2883 [[Overflow]] | ||
rect 266 2329 448 2566 [[Graminoids:_List| Grasses]] | rect 266 2329 448 2566 [[Graminoids:_List| Grasses]] | ||
rect 400 2183 703 2566 [[Perennials: List| Perennials]] | rect 400 2183 703 2566 [[Perennials: List| Perennials]] | ||
rect 1035 2376 1104 2571 [[Graminoids:_List| Grasses]] | rect 1035 2376 1104 2571 [[Graminoids:_List| Grasses]] | ||
− | rect | + | rect 291 2798 1155 3059 [[Biomedia|Filter Media]] |
− | + | poly 344 3056 742 3130 1101 3057 [[Choker layer|Choker Layer]] | |
− | poly | + | poly 290 2740 270 2736 275 3065 745 3154 1177 3068 1174 2741 1155 2740 1155 3050 740 3130 290 3046 [[Liner]] |
− | rect 1140 | + | rect 99 3052 184 3141 [[Overflow|Outlet Distribution Pipe to Storm Sewer]] |
+ | rect 77 2652 204 3217 [[Overflow|Catch basin]] | ||
+ | rect 1252 1140 1929 1218 [[Trench drains: Gallery|Trench drains]] | ||
+ | rect 1248 2647 1916 2738 [[Trench drains: Gallery|Trench drains]] | ||
+ | poly 738 3152 1175 3068 1172 3217 273 3215 273 3061 [[Soil groups|Compacted Subgrade Soil]] | ||
+ | rect 469 2652 714 2798 [[Flow through media|Ponding Depth]] | ||
+ | rect 79 859 222 982 [[Overflow|Catch basin]] | ||
+ | |||
</imagemap> | </imagemap> | ||
+ | |||
Over underground infrastructure, soils prone to subsidence, or on sites considered to be pollution hot spots, it may be necessary to prevent all [[infiltration]]. Stormwater planters are "filtration-only" BMPs, similar to bioretention cells, that can be squeezed into tight urban spaces, adjacent to buildings and within the usual setbacks required for infiltrating facilities. Stormwater planters can also be used as a means of providing building-integrated LID by capturing a portion of the rainwater from the rooftop. | Over underground infrastructure, soils prone to subsidence, or on sites considered to be pollution hot spots, it may be necessary to prevent all [[infiltration]]. Stormwater planters are "filtration-only" BMPs, similar to bioretention cells, that can be squeezed into tight urban spaces, adjacent to buildings and within the usual setbacks required for infiltrating facilities. Stormwater planters can also be used as a means of providing building-integrated LID by capturing a portion of the rainwater from the rooftop. |
Revision as of 20:56, 8 March 2022
Over underground infrastructure, soils prone to subsidence, or on sites considered to be pollution hot spots, it may be necessary to prevent all infiltration. Stormwater planters are "no infiltration" or "filtration-only" BMPs, similar to bioretention cells, that can be squeezed into tight urban spaces, adjacent to buildings and within the usual setbacks required for infiltrating facilities. Stormwater planters can also be used as a means of providing building-integrated LID by capturing a portion of the rainwater from the rooftop. This type of cell can be constructed above grade in any waterproof and structurally sound container, e.g. in cast concrete or a metal tank.
Overview[edit]
Stormwater planters are an ideal technology for:
- Sites which cannot infiltrate water owing to contaminated soils or shallow bedrock,
- Zero-lot-line developments such as condos or dense urban infill.
Take a look at the downloadable Bioretention Factsheet below for a .pdf overview of this LID Best Management Practice:
The fundamental components of a stormwater planter are:
- a planting bed of filter media,
- suitable vegetation,
- decorative aggregate or stone,
- An underdrain,
- An impermeable liner
The design may benefit from:
Planning Considerations[edit]
Stormwater planters may be integrated into the landscape similarly to bioretention practices. See bioretention planning.
Additional site opportunities[edit]
As they do not require connection to the earth for infiltration purposes, stormwater planters can also be used in elevated locations. They are sometimes used in retrofit applications on otherwise impermeable surface, as raised beds or planters surrounding buildings. They can be employed to capture runoff from roof drains or downspouts or even upon terraces or vertical surfaces of buildings.
Design[edit]
This article is specific to flow-through stormwater planters, vegetated systems that do not infiltrate water to the native soil.
If you are designing a planted system which does infiltrate water, see advice on Bioretention: Sizing.
The dimensions of a stormwater planter are largely predetermined according to the function of the component. As they do not contain a storage reservoir the planters rely more upon careful selection of materials. Both the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the filter media and the number and size of perforations of the underdrain pipe play critical roles for flow control. Options for maintaining separation between filter media and clear stone aggregate surrounding the perforated pipe include a 100 mm deep choker layer or sheet of geotextile filter fabric.
Component | Recommended depth (with underdrain pipe) | Typical porosity (n) |
---|---|---|
Ponding (dp) | 150 to 450 mm | 1 |
Mulch | 75 ± 25 mm |
|
Filter media (dm) |
|
|
Choker layer | 100 mm | 0.4 |
Perforated pipe diameter | 150 to 200 mm | 0.4 |
Clear stone aggregate layer below perforated pipe | 50 mm (although commonly omitted altogether). | 0.4 |
Filter media[edit]
See Bioretention: Filter media
Underdrain[edit]
Stormwater planters differ from full and/or partial infiltration bioretention practices in that the storage function is provided only by the water retention capacity of the filter media. As such, there is no storage reservoir and the only purpose to the aggregate layer is to drain water to the perforated pipe. For this, a medium aggregate as described in choker layer is recommended as it negates the need for a separating layer to the filter media. Design details can be found here Underdrains for non-exfiltrationg practices.
Planting[edit]
- Planters must be designed in a way that insulates the soil through freezing temperatures, or plant species that can survive the winter season in raised planters must be used.
- Stormwater planters routinely capture only rainwater flowing from adjacent rooftops. This means that salt may be less of a concern than in Bioretention: Parking lots or Bioretention: Streetscapes.
- The plant lists are still a good place to start when selecting species for LID in Ontario.
- A more formal aesthetic for the planting design is appropriate for the urban hardscape setting.
Over underground infrastructure, soils prone to subsidence, or on sites considered to be pollution hot spots, it may be necessary to prevent all infiltration. Stormwater planters are "filtration-only" BMPs, similar to bioretention cells, that can be squeezed into tight urban spaces, adjacent to buildings and within the usual setbacks required for infiltrating facilities. Stormwater planters can also be used as a means of providing building-integrated LID by capturing a portion of the rainwater from the rooftop.
This type of cell can be constructed above grade in any waterproof and structurally sound container, e.g. in cast concrete or a metal tank.
Liners[edit]
An impermeable liner is incorporated into non-infiltrating practices such as stormwater planters, and may be applied in permeable pavements installations where separation from the native soils and groundwater is required.
- Waterproof containment can be created using concrete or a plastic membrane/liner (HDPE or EPDM are common materials).
- When the membrane is being used directly in the ground, punctures from stones can be prevented by compacting a layer sand (30 - 50 mm) over the soil prior to installing the membrane.
- Alternatively, a manufactured cushion fabric (geotextile) can be employed for this purpose.
- The top surface of the membrane must also be protected from stone and gravel being used for inside the BMP. Again, sand or a cushion fabric may be used.
- When a pipe is used to provide drainage from the practice to an outlet structure or storm sewer, a 'pipe boot' or flange should be sealed to both the pipe and the liner to prevent leaks.
Filter bed surface[edit]
As stormwater planters are often quite small and receive very rapid flow, both a level spreader and the use of mulch and stone to dissipate energy from concentrated inflow are strongly recommended.
Gallery[edit]
Stormwater planters are ideal for situating alongside buildings to capture rainwater from roof runoff. LSRCA headquarters, 2017.
Stormwater planter, treating downspout runoff, at Waterview Rec Center, Philidelphia
Photo credit: PWDRain garden, Illick Hall, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY
Photo credit: DASonnenfeld
Performance[edit]
Hydrology[edit]
Water quality[edit]
See Also[edit]
Proprietary links[edit]
A number of precast modules exist to contain treatment media. As many of these systems are enclosed water balance calculations may be erroneous where evapotranspiration is constrained.
In our effort to make this guide as functional as possible, we have decided to include proprietary systems and links to manufacturers websites.
Inclusion of such links does not constitute endorsement by the Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program.
Lists are ordered alphabetically; link updates are welcomed using the form below.
- ↑ Davis, Allen P., Robert G. Traver, William F. Hunt, Ryan Lee, Robert A. Brown, and Jennifer M. Olszewski. “Hydrologic Performance of Bioretention Storm-Water Control Measures.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 17, no. 5 (May 2012): 604–14. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000467.
- ↑ Yeakley, J.A., and K.K. Norton. “Performance Assessment of Three Types of Rainwater Detention Structures for an Urban Development in Wilsonville, Oregon, USA,” 70. Portland, 2009.
- ↑ Macnamara, J.; Derry, C. Pollution Removal Performance of Laboratory Simulations of Sydney’s Street Stormwater Biofilters. Water 2017, 9, 907.;doi:10.3390/w9110907
- ↑ Lucke, T., & Nichols, P. W. B. (2015). The pollution removal and stormwater reduction performance of street-side bioretention basins after ten years in operation. Science of The Total Environment, 536, 784–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.07.142
- ↑ Macnamara, J.; Derry, C. Pollution Removal Performance of Laboratory Simulations of Sydney’s Street Stormwater Biofilters. Water 2017, 9, 907. doi:10.3390/w9110907