Difference between revisions of "Stormwater planters"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<imagemap> | <imagemap> | ||
| − | File:Bioretention No infiltration | + | File:Bioretention No infiltration placementswap.png|thumb|600 px|Stormwater planter or no infiltration bioretention cell draining a parking lot. This design variation includes an impermeable liner, and underdrain and surface overflow pipes to allow excess water to leave the practice. <span style="color:red">''A note: The following is an "image map", feel free to explore the image with your cursor and click on highlighted labels that appear to take you to corresponding pages on the Wiki.''</span> |
| + | rect 1288 1419 1353 1483 [[Underdrains|Underdrain Access Structure]] | ||
| + | rect 1290 2822 1345 3140 [[Underdrains|Underdrain Access Structure]] | ||
| + | rect 1288 3142 1345 3191 [[Underdrains|Underdrain]] | ||
poly 866 326 866 241 1386 241 1386 416 1392 683 1337 620 1270 579 1278 410 1241 339 1078 326 1045 398 1049 400 992 355 [[Mulch|Mulch]] | poly 866 326 866 241 1386 241 1386 416 1392 683 1337 620 1270 579 1278 410 1241 339 1078 326 1045 398 1049 400 992 355 [[Mulch|Mulch]] | ||
poly 870 685 868 610 1000 567 1004 632 [[Mulch|Mulch]] | poly 870 685 868 610 1000 567 1004 632 [[Mulch|Mulch]] | ||
| Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
rect 1007 1089 1235 1399 [[Plant lists|Vegetation]] | rect 1007 1089 1235 1399 [[Plant lists|Vegetation]] | ||
rect 939 1415 1011 1482 [[Overflow|Overflow Outlet]] | rect 939 1415 1011 1482 [[Overflow|Overflow Outlet]] | ||
| − | |||
rect 854 1652 1408 2651 [[Trees: List|Tree]] | rect 854 1652 1408 2651 [[Trees: List|Tree]] | ||
rect 1064 2684 1227 2822 [[Plant lists|Vegetation]] | rect 1064 2684 1227 2822 [[Plant lists|Vegetation]] | ||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
rect 1017 2902 1119 2942 [[Mulch|Mulch]] | rect 1017 2902 1119 2942 [[Mulch|Mulch]] | ||
rect 1164 2900 1398 2938 [[Mulch|Mulch]] | rect 1164 2900 1398 2938 [[Mulch|Mulch]] | ||
| − | |||
rect 960 3126 1019 3175 [[Overflow|Overflow Outlet Pipe]] | rect 960 3126 1019 3175 [[Overflow|Overflow Outlet Pipe]] | ||
rect 956 2845 1017 3177 [[Overflow|Overflow Outlet]] | rect 956 2845 1017 3177 [[Overflow|Overflow Outlet]] | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
rect 1170 3116 1388 3191 [[Reservoir aggregate|Clear Stone / Aggregate]] | rect 1170 3116 1388 3191 [[Reservoir aggregate|Clear Stone / Aggregate]] | ||
rect 825 3238 1439 3279 [[Soil Groups|Compacted Subgrade]] | rect 825 3238 1439 3279 [[Soil Groups|Compacted Subgrade]] | ||
| − | |||
rect 825 2867 862 3238 [[Liner|Impermeable Liner]] | rect 825 2867 862 3238 [[Liner|Impermeable Liner]] | ||
rect 862 3191 1437 3242 [[Liner|Impermeable Liner]] | rect 862 3191 1437 3242 [[Liner|Impermeable Liner]] | ||
Revision as of 16:08, 3 March 2022
Over underground infrastructure, soils prone to subsidence, or on sites considered to be pollution hot spots, it may be necessary to prevent all infiltration. Stormwater planters are "filtration-only" BMPs, similar to bioretention cells, that can be squeezed into tight urban spaces, adjacent to buildings and within the usual setbacks required for infiltrating facilities. Stormwater planters can also be used as a means of providing building-integrated LID by capturing a portion of the rainwater from the rooftop. This type of cell can be constructed above grade in any waterproof and structurally sound container, e.g. in cast concrete or a metal tank.
Overview[edit]
Stormwater planters are an ideal technology for:
- Sites which cannot infiltrate water owing to contaminated soils or shallow bedrock,
- Zero-lot-line developments such as condos or dense urban infill.
Take a look at the downloadable Bioretention Factsheet below for a .pdf overview of this LID Best Management Practice:
The fundamental components of a stormwater planter are:
- a planting bed of filter media,
- suitable vegetation,
- decorative aggregate or stone,
- An underdrain,
- An impermeable liner
The design may benefit from:
Planning Considerations[edit]
Stormwater planters may be integrated into the landscape similarly to bioretention practices. See bioretention planning.
Additional site opportunities[edit]
As they do not require connection to the earth for infiltration purposes, stormwater planters can also be used in elevated locations. They are sometimes used in retrofit applications on otherwise impermeable surface, as raised beds or planters surrounding buildings. They can be employed to capture runoff from roof drains or downspouts or even upon terraces or vertical surfaces of buildings.
Design[edit]
This article is specific to flow-through stormwater planters, vegetated systems that do not infiltrate water to the native soil.
If you are designing a planted system which does infiltrate water, see advice on Bioretention: Sizing.
The dimensions of a stormwater planter are largely predetermined according to the function of the component. As they do not contain a storage reservoir the planters rely more upon careful selection of materials. Both the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the filter media and the number and size of perforations of the underdrain pipe play critical roles for flow control. Options for maintaining separation between filter media and clear stone aggregate surrounding the perforated pipe include a 100 mm deep choker layer or sheet of geotextile filter fabric.
| Component | Recommended depth (with underdrain pipe) | Typical porosity (n) |
|---|---|---|
| Ponding (dp) | 150 to 450 mm | 1 |
| Mulch | 75 ± 25 mm |
|
| Filter media (dm) |
|
|
| Choker layer | 100 mm | 0.4 |
| Perforated pipe diameter | 150 to 200 mm | 0.4 |
| Clear stone aggregate layer below perforated pipe | 50 mm (although commonly omitted altogether). | 0.4 |
Filter media[edit]
See Bioretention: Filter media
Underdrain[edit]
Stormwater planters differ from full and/or partial infiltration bioretention practices in that the storage function is provided only by the water retention capacity of the filter media. As such, there is no storage reservoir and the only purpose to the aggregate layer is to drain water to the perforated pipe. For this, a medium aggregate as described in choker layer is recommended as it negates the need for a separating layer to the filter media. Design details can be found here Underdrains for non-exfiltrationg practices.
Planting[edit]
- Planters must be designed in a way that insulates the soil through freezing temperatures, or plant species that can survive the winter season in raised planters must be used.
- Stormwater planters routinely capture only rainwater flowing from adjacent rooftops. This means that salt may be less of a concern than in Bioretention: Parking lots or Bioretention: Streetscapes.
- The plant lists are still a good place to start when selecting species for LID in Ontario.
- A more formal aesthetic for the planting design is appropriate for the urban hardscape setting.
Over underground infrastructure, soils prone to subsidence, or on sites considered to be pollution hot spots, it may be necessary to prevent all infiltration. Stormwater planters are "filtration-only" BMPs, similar to bioretention cells, that can be squeezed into tight urban spaces, adjacent to buildings and within the usual setbacks required for infiltrating facilities. Stormwater planters can also be used as a means of providing building-integrated LID by capturing a portion of the rainwater from the rooftop.
This type of cell can be constructed above grade in any waterproof and structurally sound container, e.g. in cast concrete or a metal tank.
Liners[edit]
An impermeable liner is incorporated into non-infiltrating practices such as stormwater planters, and may be applied in permeable pavements installations where separation from the native soils and groundwater is required.
- Waterproof containment can be created using concrete or a plastic membrane/liner (HDPE or EPDM are common materials).
- When the membrane is being used directly in the ground, punctures from stones can be prevented by compacting a layer sand (30 - 50 mm) over the soil prior to installing the membrane.
- Alternatively, a manufactured cushion fabric (geotextile) can be employed for this purpose.
- The top surface of the membrane must also be protected from stone and gravel being used for inside the BMP. Again, sand or a cushion fabric may be used.
- When a pipe is used to provide drainage from the practice to an outlet structure or storm sewer, a 'pipe boot' or flange should be sealed to both the pipe and the liner to prevent leaks.
Filter bed surface[edit]
As stormwater planters are often quite small and receive very rapid flow, both a level spreader and the use of mulch and stone to dissipate energy from concentrated inflow are strongly recommended.
Gallery[edit]
Stormwater planters are ideal for situating alongside buildings to capture rainwater from roof runoff. LSRCA headquarters, 2017.
Stormwater planter, treating downspout runoff, at Waterview Rec Center, Philidelphia
Photo credit: PWD
Rain garden, Illick Hall, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY
Photo credit: DASonnenfeld
Performance[edit]
Hydrology[edit]
Water quality[edit]
See Also[edit]
Proprietary links[edit]
A number of precast modules exist to contain treatment media. As many of these systems are enclosed water balance calculations may be erroneous where evapotranspiration is constrained.
In our effort to make this guide as functional as possible, we have decided to include proprietary systems and links to manufacturers websites.
Inclusion of such links does not constitute endorsement by the Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program.
Lists are ordered alphabetically; link updates are welcomed using the form below.
- ↑ Davis, Allen P., Robert G. Traver, William F. Hunt, Ryan Lee, Robert A. Brown, and Jennifer M. Olszewski. “Hydrologic Performance of Bioretention Storm-Water Control Measures.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 17, no. 5 (May 2012): 604–14. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000467.
- ↑ Yeakley, J.A., and K.K. Norton. “Performance Assessment of Three Types of Rainwater Detention Structures for an Urban Development in Wilsonville, Oregon, USA,” 70. Portland, 2009.
- ↑ Macnamara, J.; Derry, C. Pollution Removal Performance of Laboratory Simulations of Sydney’s Street Stormwater Biofilters. Water 2017, 9, 907.;doi:10.3390/w9110907
- ↑ Lucke, T., & Nichols, P. W. B. (2015). The pollution removal and stormwater reduction performance of street-side bioretention basins after ten years in operation. Science of The Total Environment, 536, 784–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.07.142
- ↑ Macnamara, J.; Derry, C. Pollution Removal Performance of Laboratory Simulations of Sydney’s Street Stormwater Biofilters. Water 2017, 9, 907. doi:10.3390/w9110907