Difference between revisions of "Bioretention: Sizing"
Dean Young (talk | contribs) |
Dean Young (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | [[Mulch] depth | + | | [[Mulch]] depth |
| colspan="2" |75 ± 25 mm | | colspan="2" |75 ± 25 mm | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 17:46, 4 May 2020
This article is specific to bioretention, vegetated systems that infiltrate water to the native soil.
If you are designing a planted system which does not infiltrate water, see advice on Planters: Sizing.
Many of the dimensions in a bioretention system can be predetermined according to the function of the component. There is greatest flexibility in the ponding depth and the depth of the storage reservoir beneath the optional underdrain pipe. The table below describes some recommended values to use to begin the design process.
Component | Recommended depth (with underdrain pipe) | Recommended depth (no underdrain pipe) | Typical porosity (n) |
---|---|---|---|
Surface ponding depth, maximum (dp, max) |
|
See below | 1 |
Mulch depth | 75 ± 25 mm |
| |
Filter media (dm) |
|
| |
Choker layer | 100 mm | 0.4 | |
Perforated pipe and surrounding aggregate | 200 mm (i.e. pipe diameter) | Not applicable | 0.4 |
Storage reservoir (ds) | See below | See below | 0.4 |
Before you begin you will need to know the following;
- Catchment area (i.e. contributing drainage area), Ac (m2)
- Catchment impervious area, Ai (m2)
- Catchment runoff coefficient, C
- Design storm intensity, i (mm/h)
- Design storm duration, D (h)
- Infiltration target for design storm event, Id (mm)
- Drainage time t (h) to fully drain the active storage of the practice, based on provincial or municipal criteria or average inter-event period for the location
- Field infiltration rate of the underlying native soil ff (mm/h), median of field measurements or based on interpolation from median grain-size distribution results
- Design infiltration rate of the underlying native soil f' (mm/h), median field measured value divided by a safety factor (z)
- Safety factor, z (dimensionless value between 2 and 3) chosen by designer based on consideration of risk of failure factors
- Proposed surface grade elevation at the practice location (metres above sea level, masl)
- Elevation of the seasonally high water table or bedrock surface (metres above sea level, masl), below the practice location
- Effective porosity of any void-producing structure system (e.g. soil cells, chambers and associated aggregate) included, n' (if applicable)
- Types of plants to be supported by the filter media bed (i.e. grasses vs. mix of grasses, plants and shrubs vs. trees)
- How runoff will be delivered to the practice (i.e. to filter bed surface; to storage reservoir; or both)
Decide if an underdrain will be included[edit]
- Step 1: Based on the median infiltration rate of the native soil at 1.5 to 3 metres depth below the practice location, or interpolation from the median grain-size distribution results, decide if an underdrain will be included in the design.
If the field estimated infiltration rate of the underlying native soil (ff) is less than 15 mm/h, include an underdrain.
Select a surface ponding depth to begin sizing with[edit]
- Step 2: Determine a maximum surface ponding depth (dp, max)
For practices without underdrains:
Where:
- f' = Design infiltration rate (mm/h), and
- 48 = Maximum permissible drainage time for ponded water (h)
- Note that in designs without underdrains, conceptually the drainage of ponded water is limited by infiltration through the base of the practice.
For practices with underdrains see recommended maximum surface ponding depth for each filter media blend in the table above.
- Step 3: Select a design surface ponding depth, dp' (m) to begin sizing with
For practices with soft (i.e. landscaped) edges and bowl-shaped ponding areas calculate the mean surface ponding depth: For practices with hard edges and vertical-walled ponding areas (e.g., stormwater planter, soil cell) use the maximum ponding depth:
Determine the active storage depth, da of the practice[edit]
- Step 4: Determine the active storage depth, da of the practice
For practices without an underdrain, the active storage depth equals the total depth of the practice, including surface ponding;
For practices with the underdrain perforated pipe elevated off the bottom of the storage reservoir:
da= depth of storage reservoir below the invert of the underdrain perforated pipe.
For practices with the underdrain perforated pipe installed on the bottom of the storage reservoir and connected to a riser (e.g., standpipe and 90 degree coupling):
da= Difference between invert elevation of reservoir bottom and outlet of the riser (i.e invert elevation of the 90 degree coupling).
- Step 5: Calculate the active storage depth of the practice (da, mm):
For practices with no underdrain:
Where:
- f' = Design infiltration rate (mm/hr),
- t = Drainage time (hrs). Check local regulations for drainage time requirements; and
- n = Porosity of the reservoir aggregate
- dp= design surface ponding depth
For practices with an underdrain:
Where:
- f' = Design infiltration rate (mm/hr),
- t = Drainage time (hrs). Check local regulations for drainage time requirements; and
- n = Porosity of the reservoir aggregate
To boost drainage performance on fine-textured, low permeability soils, consider designing storage reservoirs even deeper than those calculated using the above approach, that many not fully drain between storm events, which increases hydraulic head and infiltration rate at the base of the practice. See Low permeability soils for more information.
Calculate the total depth of the practice, dT[edit]
- Step 2: Calculate the active storage depth of the storage reservoir (ds, mm):
For practices with no underdrain:
Where:
- f' = Design infiltration rate (mm/hr),
- t = Drainage time (hrs). Check local regulations for drainage time requirements; and
- n = Porosity of the reservoir aggregate
For practices with an underdrain:
Where:
- f' = Design infiltration rate (mm/hr),
- t = Drainage time (hrs). Check local regulations for drainage time requirements; and
- n = Porosity of the reservoir aggregate
To boost drainage performance on fine-textured, low permeability soils, consider designing storage reservoirs even deeper than those calculated using the above approach, that many not fully drain between storm events, which increases hydraulic head and infiltration rate at the base of the practice. See Low permeability soils for more information.
- Step 2: Determine what the planting needs are and assign an appropriate depth of filter media, using the table above.
- Step 3: Select an underdrain perforated pipe diameter (typically 100 - 200 mm), assign this as an 'embedded' depth equal to the pipe diameter. *Note that this component does not apply if a downstream riser is being used to create the storage reservoir.
- Step 5: Sum total depth of bioretention components, and compare to available depth between the surface grade and the seasonally high water table or top of bedrock elevations.
- Step 6: Adjust component depths to maintain a separation of 1.0 metre between base of the practice and seasonally high water table or top of bedrock elevation, or a lesser or greater value based on groundwater mounding analysis. See below and Groundwater for more information.
Calculate the remaining dimensions[edit]
- Step 7: Multiply the depth of each separate water-retaining component layer in the profile of the practice by its corresponding porosity and then sum the total to find the 1 dimensional storage (in mm).
- Step 8: Calculate the required total storage (ST, m3):
Where:
- RVCT is the runoff volume control target (mm),
- Ai is the impervious area within the catchment (Ha), and
- 10 is the units correction between m3 and mm.Ha.
- Step 9. Divide required storage (m3) by the 1 dimensional storage (in m) to find the required footprint area (Ap) for the bioretention in m2.
- Step 10. Calculate the peak flow rate through the perforated pipe,
- Step 11. Calculate the peak flow rate through the filter media,
- Step 12. Determine if downstream flow control is required to achieve hydrologic objectives.
Additional calculations[edit]
Calculating infiltration practice drainage in 1 dimension[edit]
This spreadsheet compares drainage in a single dimension under zero head conditions, mean head conditions and falling head conditions. It provides a more conservative measurement of the drainage time for the purposes of groundwater mounding (where a shorter drainage time causes a greater impact).
Drainage time (3D)[1][edit]
In some situations, it may be desirable to reduce the size of the bioretention required, by accounting for rapid drainage. Typically, this is only worth exploring over sandy textured native subsoils with rapid infiltration.
Note that narrow, linear bioretention features (or bioswales) drain faster than round or blocky footprint geometries.
- Begin the drainage time calculation by dividing the area of the practice (Ap) by the perimeter (x).
- To estimate the time (t) to fully drain the facility:
Where:
- n is the porosity of the filter media,
- Ap is the area of the practice (m2),
- f' is the design infiltration rate (mm/hr),
- x is the perimeter of the practice (m), and
- dT is the total depth of the practice, including the surface ponding depth (m).
Groundwater mounding[edit]
When you wish to model the extent of groundwater mounding beneath an infiltration facility. This tool uses Hantush's derivation (1967).
Note that this is a minor adaptation (metric units and formatting) from the original tool, written and hosted by the USGS.
- ↑ Woods Ballard, B., S. Wilson, H. Udale-Clarke, S. Illman, T. Scott, R. Ahsley, and R. Kellagher. 2016. The SuDS Manual. 5th ed. CIRIA, London.