Difference between revisions of "Erosion and Sediment Control"
ChristineLN (talk | contribs) |
ChristineLN (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
| | | | ||
[[Media:B2 SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE unfrozen.pdf|Sediment control fence (unfrozen)]] | [[Media:B2 SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE unfrozen.pdf|Sediment control fence (unfrozen)]] | ||
| + | |||
[[Media:B2 SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE frozen.pdf|Sediment control fence (frozen)]] | [[Media:B2 SEDIMENT CONTROL FENCE frozen.pdf|Sediment control fence (frozen)]] | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 238: | Line 239: | ||
*in place of sediment fence when frozen | *in place of sediment fence when frozen | ||
| [https://sourcetostream.com/2025-track-2-day-1-anderton/ S2S Conference Presentation] | | [https://sourcetostream.com/2025-track-2-day-1-anderton/ S2S Conference Presentation] | ||
| + | |||
[https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/home/erosion-and-sediment-control/permeable-barriers/compost-biofilters-for-stormwater-management/ Compost Biofilters for SWM (TRCA, 2007)] | [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/home/erosion-and-sediment-control/permeable-barriers/compost-biofilters-for-stormwater-management/ Compost Biofilters for SWM (TRCA, 2007)] | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 254: | Line 256: | ||
*in place of sediment fence when frozen | *in place of sediment fence when frozen | ||
| | | | ||
| − | [[Media:Screenshot 2025-11-19 111153.png|Coir log with | + | [[Media:Screenshot 2025-11-19 111153.png|Coir log with stakes (Terrafix Geosynthetics, 2015)<ref>Terrafix Geosynthetics. 2015. Coir Mats and Logs. https://terrafixgeo.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CoirMatsLogsBrochure-2015.pdf</ref>]] |
| | | | ||
[[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 101657.png|200px|frameless|center]] | [[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 101657.png|200px|frameless|center]] | ||
| Line 265: | Line 267: | ||
*Do not use in natural features | *Do not use in natural features | ||
| | | | ||
| + | [[Media:Rock_check_dams_diagram.pdf|Temporary rock flow check dam diagram]] | ||
| | | | ||
[[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 100905.png|200px|frameless|center]] | [[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 100905.png|200px|frameless|center]] | ||
| Line 281: | Line 284: | ||
*required by municipality | *required by municipality | ||
| | | | ||
| + | [[Media:Mud mat.pdf|Mud mat]] | ||
| | | | ||
[[File:Screenshot 2025-07-30 161438.png|200px|frameless|center]] | [[File:Screenshot 2025-07-30 161438.png|200px|frameless|center]] | ||
| Line 292: | Line 296: | ||
*best used in treatment train | *best used in treatment train | ||
| | | | ||
| + | [[Media:B2_SEDIMENT_DEWATERING_BAG_unfrozen.pdf|Dewatering treatment train (unfrozen)]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Media:B2_SEDIMENT_DEWATERING_BAG_(frozen.pdf|Dewatering treatment train (frozen)]] | ||
| | | | ||
[[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 103437.png|200px|frameless|center]] | [[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 103437.png|200px|frameless|center]] | ||
| Line 303: | Line 310: | ||
*treatment train required for drainage areas >1 ha | *treatment train required for drainage areas >1 ha | ||
| | | | ||
| + | [[Media:Excavated drop inlet.pdf|Excavated drop inlet]] | ||
| + | [[Media:Gravel jacket.pdf|Gravel jacket]] | ||
| | | | ||
[[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 103724.png|200px|frameless|center]] | [[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 103724.png|200px|frameless|center]] | ||
| Line 314: | Line 323: | ||
*drainage areas ≤ 2 ha that do not drain to another detention feature | *drainage areas ≤ 2 ha that do not drain to another detention feature | ||
| | | | ||
| + | [[Media:Ediment trap within an earthen ditch.pdf|Sediment trap within an earthen ditch]] | ||
| | | | ||
[[File:Screenshot 2025-11-13 103532.png|200px|frameless|center]] | [[File:Screenshot 2025-11-13 103532.png|200px|frameless|center]] | ||
| Line 323: | Line 333: | ||
*Treatment of runoff from drainage areas > 2 ha | *Treatment of runoff from drainage areas > 2 ha | ||
*end-of-pipe control | *end-of-pipe control | ||
| − | | [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/home/erosion-and-sediment-control/construction-sediment-control-ponds/ STEP Wet Ponds Page] | + | | |
| + | [[Media:B2_SEDIMENT_CONTROL_PONDS_diagram.pdf|Sediment control pond]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/home/erosion-and-sediment-control/construction-sediment-control-ponds/ STEP Wet Ponds Page] | ||
| | | | ||
[[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 104639.png|200px|frameless|center]] | [[File:Screenshot 2025-08-06 104639.png|200px|frameless|center]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:49, 19 November 2025
Overview[edit]
Erosion and sediment controls (ESC) are technologies, practices and procedures that are applied to prevent the release of sediment from construction sites. Rapid urban expansion and associated construction activities are a significant source of stress to the natural environment. As construction processes involve the removal of vegetation and de-stabilization of soils, they can accelerate natural processes of erosion and sedimentation, mobilizing more sediment and associated contaminants that can ultimately end up in downstream receiving water systems. ESC measures are essential to help reduce these sediment loads from active construction sites and protect downstream aquatic habitats from becoming impaired.
Inadequate ESC during construction can cause:
- sediment-laden runoff to enter downstream and adjacent natural features, including streams, lakes, wetlands and woodlots;
- deposition of sediment on adjacent private property and roadways;
- clogging of onsite stormwater management systems and LIDs;
- expensive cleanup and restoration costs;
- delays or stop-work orders; and
- fines from regulatory agencies.
Implementing effective ESC practices throughout all stages of construction is essential to sustainable urban growth and ensuring regulatory compliance.
Erosion risk assessments (ERA)[edit]
To manage the potential negative impacts of construction activities in the absence of effective ESC measures, Erosion Risk Assessments (ERAs) are conducted to guide the selection and placement of appropriate ESC practices on site.
ERAs are recommended when:
- the extent of land disturbance is greater than 10 ha and duration is longer than 30 days, or
- construction activities are planned in or near natural water features, or
- the site drains to species at risk habitat
The hybrid qualitative ERA approach is recommended in the above situations, except where local regulatory agencies require a different approach. The hybrid qualitative ERA approach estimates erosion risk by dividing a site into areas based on soil, slope, and ground cover, then rating each area as low, moderate, or high erosion risk to help choose the right erosion control practices for each stage of construction. Completing an ERA demonstrates due diligence, identifies high-risk areas early, informs effective BMP selection and placement, guides the use of enhanced controls, and provides context for decision-making. To learn more about ERAs, read section 6.2 in the Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Urban Construction (2019).
ESC plan design[edit]
An ESC plan should be created based on a given site’s ERA, with more controls used in the higher risk areas.
An ESC plan should be designed for each stage of construction:
- Topsoil stripping, grading, and stabilization
- Servicing
- Building construction
- Final stabilization/rehabilitation and ESC decommissioning
An ESC plan should include drawings, standard notes and reports depicting and describing the site conditions (e.g. grades, locations of natural features, soil stockpiles and other key points of interest) during each phase of construction, and the BMPs that will be applied to mitigate erosion and sediment transport.
Types of ESC[edit]
Erosion controls
• prevent exposed soils from being entrained by water or wind
• address sediment at its source
Sediment controls
• remove sediment suspended in stormwater through settling and filtration
The most effective application of ESC utilizes a multi-barrier approach, in which erosion controls and sediment controls are installed in sequence to form a resilient system that protects the natural environment from sediment-related impacts. A multi-barrier system incorporates built-in redundancy, ensuring that if one control fails, additional measures remain in place to safeguard downstream features. Selecting appropriate BMPs for each project stage requires an understanding of their function, intended use, expected performance, and maintenance needs. Note: Isolation measures are not covered on this page but are detailed in the 2019 Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Urban Construction.
Table 1 and 2 provide an overview of common erosion and sediment controls. Click on the BMP name in the first column to read the detailed design requirements and installation, inspection, maintenance, and decommissioning guidance from the 2019 Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Urban Construction. A description and common applications of each practice are listed in the second and third columns, respectively. The fourth column provides additional resources and the fifth column shows an example image of the BMP.
Good and poor examples of ESC installation are shown on the right side. Additional examples can be found on the pre-construction wiki.
Erosion controls[edit]
| BMP (click for more information) | Description | Applicability | Drawings and Additional Resources | Example Image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimized or Phased Land Clearing | Preservation of vegetated areas intercepts and infiltrates rainfall. | Areas not being immediately developed on larger sites (>10 ha) | ||
| Vegetated Filter Strips | Gently sloping, vegetated areas that slow and filter runoff. | Areas that may benefit from leaving vegetation in place | Vegetated filter strip design Wiki | Source: Trinkhaus Engineering |
| Slope Drains | Flexible pipe that conveys water down a disturbed slope to prevent erosion from concentrated runoff. | Exposed (and especially long or steep) slopes that convey concentrated flow | ||
| Interceptor Swales | Stabilized flow path that conveys runoff away from bare soil to sediment control measures. | Any unstabilized areas, but especially where:
|
||
| Outlet Protection | Energy dissipation devices or surface hardening that prevents scour erosion at outlets. | Base of any outlet releasing concentrated flow | ||
| Mulching | Layer of organic material (e.g., straw, bark, wood shavings, paper fibre, compost) that absorbs rainfall and acts as a physical barrier to erosion. |
|
||
| Seeding | Application of seed to establish vegetation for soil stability. |
Click to expand. |
||
| Surface Roughening | Creates uneven surfaces and depressions to reduce runoff velocity, trap sediment, keep seed in place, and improve vegetation establishment |
|
Surface roughening diagram for slopes steeper than 3H:1V and H > 1.5 m Surface roughening for slopes steeper than 2H:1V using bulldozer (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality)[3] |
|
| Rolled Erosion Control Products | Netting, blankets, or turf reinforcement mats act as a physical barrier to erosion. Biodegradable options free of plastic netting prevent wildlife ensnaring. |
|
||
| Chemical Soil Stabilization | Substances that bind soil particles to stabilize the soil surface. |
|
Anionic Polyacrylamide Application Guide for Urban Construction in Ontario (TRCA, 2013) |
Sediment controls[edit]
| BMP (click for more information) | Description | Applicability | Drawings and Additional Resources | Example Image |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sediment Control Fence | Geotextile material supported by posts and trenched into the ground to support settling of sheet flows. |
|
||
| Filter Socks | Tubular mesh socks filled with wood chip or compost that dissipate flow velocities and pond water to promote sediment settling. |
|
S2S Conference Presentation | |
| Natural Fibre Logs | Similar to filter socks but made of biodegradable materials such as coir, straw, or wood. |
|
||
| Rock Check Dams | Weir constructed across channels from granular material and geotextile to reduce flow velocity. |
|
||
| Vehicle Tracking Controls | Measures such as mud mats, shaker racks, or wheel washers to prevent vehicles from tracking mud offsite. |
Vehicle tracking controls:
Wheel washing:
|
||
| Sediment Dewatering Bags | Large geotextile bags used to filter sediment-laden water from pumped discharge. |
|
||
| Storm Drain Inlet Protection | Blocks sediment entry to inlets while allowing water through. |
|
||
| Sediment Traps | Runoff detention area created by an embankment or depression to allow sediment settling. |
|
||
| Sediment Ponds | Similar to sediment traps but larger. Excavated depression for permanent water retention. |
|
||
| Weir Tanks | Tanks that detain stormwater runoff to promote sediment settling. |
|
||
| Polymer Flocculants | Chemical agents that bind suspended particles to enhance sediment removal. |
|
STEP polymers page | |
| Active Treatment Systems | Systems combining tanks, flocculants, and filters for precise and high-efficiency contaminant removal. |
|
Protecting LID features during construction[edit]
LID practices that promote infiltration as their primary function for water quality & management of overland flows, such as bioretention areas, permeable pavements, and infiltration trenches, are vulnerable to damage during construction activities that can compromise their ability to function as intended. These features can become clogged with sediment, experience erosion at inlets and in planted areas, suffer compaction from heavy machinery, or be contaminated by pollutants in construction runoff. To minimize these risks and maintain effective protection throughout all phases of construction, the following best practices should be implemented:
Phase construction so that LID measures are constructed last. Underground LID features can be built early in the construction process, provided they are protected by a barrier such as a plug. Graphic shows an exfiltration system with a temporary plug keeping construction runoff out of the exfiltration area.
Keep LID installations offline via flow diversion until construction is complete, the drainage area is stabilized, and vehicle mud tracking is stopped. Image shows a bioretention feature during construction (left) and post-construction (right). The LID feature is protected using geotextile fabric, a sacrificial layer of stabilized sand/growing media with vegetation, and a filter sock. Once surrounding construction is complete, the layer of growing media is removed and the BMP starts receiving flow.
Avoid using LID areas as temporary detention basins, but in cases where flow cannot be routed around LID areas, protection should be used to prevent accumulated sediment from migrating into the subgrade. Graphic shows a bioretention feature during construction (left) and post-construction (right). At least 75 cm of native soil is retained between the base of the detention basin and the base of the LID feature, so that sediment accumulation in the detention basin can be removed. Once it is excavated and filled, ESC measures should be put in place to protect it until all drainage area construction and stabilization are complete.