| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | ==Strategies== | | ==Strategies== |
| | ===Fit the design to the terrain=== | | ===Fit the design to the terrain=== |
| − | Using the terrain and natural drainage as a design element is an integral part to creating a hydrologically functional landscape.<ref>Prince George’s County. 1999. Low Impact Development Design Strategies: An Integrated Design Approach. Prince George’s County, MD.</ref> Fitting development to the terrain will reduce the amount of clearing and grading required and the extent of necessary underground drainage infrastructure. This helps to preserve pre-development drainage boundaries which helps to maintain distribution of flows. Generally, siting development in upland areas will take advantage of lowland areas for conveyance, storage, and treatment. | + | Using the terrain and natural drainage as a design element is an integral part to creating a hydrologically functional landscape.<ref>Prince George’s County. 1999. Low Impact Development Design Strategies: An Integrated Design Approach. Prince George’s County, MD.</ref> Fitting development to the terrain will reduce the amount of clearing and [[grading]] required and the extent of necessary underground drainage infrastructure. This helps to preserve pre-development drainage boundaries which helps to maintain distribution of flows. Generally, siting development in upland areas will take advantage of lowland areas for conveyance, storage, and treatment. |
| | | | |
| | ===Open space and clustered development=== | | ===Open space and clustered development=== |
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| | | | |
| | ===Street network designs=== | | ===Street network designs=== |
| − | {| class="wikitable" | + | {| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;" |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |+ Figure adapted from CHMC | + | |+ Figure adapted from CMHC (2007) |
| | ! | | ! |
| | !Square grid | | !Square grid |
| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | ! | | ! |
| − | |[[File:Square Grid.png|thumb]] | + | |[[File:Square Grid.png|frameless|upright=0.35]] |
| − | |[[File:VFGA.png|thumb]] | + | |[[File:VFGA.png|frameless|upright=0.35]] |
| − | |[[File:VFGB.png|thumb]] | + | |[[File:VFGB.png|frameless|upright=0.35]] |
| − | |[[File:VFGC.png|thumb]] | + | |[[File:VFGC.png|frameless|upright=0.35]] |
| − | |[[File:VFGD.png|thumb]] | + | |[[File:VFGD.png|frameless|upright=0.35]] |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |Percent of area for streets | | |Percent of area for streets |
| Line 44: |
Line 44: |
| | |5 % required | | |5 % required |
| | |9.0 % | | |9.0 % |
| − | |8.3 %
| |
| | |8.3 % | | |8.3 % |
| | |8.3 % | | |8.3 % |
| Line 50: |
Line 49: |
| | |} | | |} |
| | | | |
| − | Certain roadway network designs create less impervious area than others. Figure 3.2.3 from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (2002) demonstrates that loop and cul-de-sac street patterns require less area for streets. These layouts by themselves may not achieve the many goals of urban design. However, used in a hybrid form together or with other street patterns, they can meet multiple urban design objectives and reduce the necessary street area.<ref>Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). 2002 (Revised 2005, 2007). Residential Street Pattern Design. Research Highlight: Socio-Economic Series 75.</ref>A study comparing different road network designs for a hypothetical community showed a fused grid pattern can reduce impervious cover by 4.3% compared to a traditional neighbourhood design.<ref>Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). 2007. Research Highlight: A Plan for Rainy Days: Water Runoff and Site Planning. Socioeconomic Series 07-013. Ottawa, ON.</ref> | + | Certain roadway network designs create less impervious area than others. The figure from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (2002) demonstrates that loop and cul-de-sac street patterns require less area for streets. These layouts by themselves may not achieve the many goals of urban design. However, used in a hybrid form together or with other street patterns, they can meet multiple urban design objectives and reduce the necessary street area.<ref>Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). 2002 (Revised 2005, 2007). Residential Street Pattern Design. Research Highlight: Socio-Economic Series 75.</ref>A study comparing different road network designs for a hypothetical community showed a fused grid pattern can reduce impervious cover by 4.3% compared to a traditional neighbourhood design.<ref>Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). 2007. Research Highlight: A Plan for Rainy Days: Water Runoff and Site Planning. Socioeconomic Series 07-013. Ottawa, ON.</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ===Reduce roadway setbacks and lot frontages=== | | ===Reduce roadway setbacks and lot frontages=== |