Line 31:
Line 31:
==Planning considerations==
==Planning considerations==
==Design==
==Design==
+
{| class="wikitable"
+
!Element
+
!Design Objective
+
!Criteria
+
|-
+
|Drainage Area
+
|Sustaining vegetation, volumetric turnover
+
|5 Ha (≥10 Ha preferred)
+
|-
+
|Treatment Volume
+
|Provision of appropriate level of protection (Table 3.2)
+
|See Table 3.2
+
|-
+
|Active Storage
+
|Detention
+
|Suspended solids settling 24 hrs (12 hrs if in conflict with min. orifice size)
+
|-
+
|Forebay
+
|Pre-treatment
+
|Minimum depth: 1 m; ii) Sized to ensure non-erosive velocities leaving forebay; iii) Maximum area: 20 % of total permanent pool
+
|-
+
|Length-to-Width Ratio
+
|Maximize flow path and minimize short-circuiting potential
+
|i) Overall: minimum 3:1; ii) Forebay: minimum 2:1
+
|-
+
|Permanent Pool Depth
+
|Vegetation requirements, rapid settling
+
|The average permanent pool depth should range from 150 mm to 300 mm
+
|-
+
|Active Storage Depth
+
|Storage/flow control, sustaining vegetation
+
|Maximum 1.0m for storms < 10 year event
+
|-
+
|Side Slopes
+
|Safety
+
|i) 5:1 For 3 m above and below permanent pool (ii) Maximum 3:1 elsewhere
+
|-
+
|Inlet
+
|Avoid clogging/freezing
+
|i) Minimum 450 mm; ii) Preferred pipe slope: >1%; iii) If submerged, obvert 150 mm below expected maximum ice depth
+
|-
+
|Outlet
+
|Avoid clogging/freezing
+
|i) Minimum: 450mm outlet pipe; ii) Preferred pipe slope: >1%; iii) If orifice control used, 75mm diameter minimum; (iv) Minimum 100mm orifice preferable
+
|-
+
|Maintenance Access
+
|Access for backhoes or dredging equipment
+
|(i) Provided to approval of Municipality; (ii) Provision of maintenance drawdown pipe preferred
+
|-
+
|Buffer
+
|Safety
+
|Minimum 7.5 m above maximum water quality/erosion control water level
+
|}
+
==Performance==
==Performance==
STEP (under previous name SWAMP) conducted their own research into the performance of stormwater wetlands, the project page and report can be viewed [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/home/urban-runoff-green-infrastructure/conventional-stormwater-management/constructed-wetlands/performance-assessment-of-an-open-and-covered-stormwater-wetland-system-aurora-ontario/ here].
STEP (under previous name SWAMP) conducted their own research into the performance of stormwater wetlands, the project page and report can be viewed [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/home/urban-runoff-green-infrastructure/conventional-stormwater-management/constructed-wetlands/performance-assessment-of-an-open-and-covered-stormwater-wetland-system-aurora-ontario/ here].