Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
<!-- not sure what you're wanting to accomplish here, but until the pathing issue is resolved a lot of the features will not work -->
+
In the mid 1970s, attempts to control runoff flow rates from urban developments were initiated. By the late 1980s, water quality became an additional focus and in the late 1990s, approaches to mitigate accelerated stream channel erosion were introduced. Lot level stormwater management approaches have been advocated in Ontario since 1995 (OMMAH, 1995), but widespread application has yet to occur. Today, with improvements in our understanding of watershed systems and the potential impacts urbanization can have on aquatic ecosystems, stormwater management addresses a broad suite of issues including fluvial geomorphology (stream channel forming processes), groundwater resources and the protection of aquatic and terrestrial habitats.
   −
<ul class="nav nav-pills">
+
Municipalities, with the support of conservation authorities, review stormwater management facilities and plans designed to address this multitude of concerns. This has led to an increasing complexity in stormwater management planning and design including:
  <li role="presentation" class="active"> [[Home]]</li>
  −
  <li role="presentation">[[Library]]</li>
  −
  <li role="presentation">[[Applications]]</li>
  −
  <li role="presentation">[[Misc]]</li>
  −
</ul>
  −
 
  −
Below will not work, as there is no way to include the PHP files to send, plus Mediawiki does not allow most types of html within documents.
  −
 
  −
<div class="control-group">
  −
  <label class="control-label" for="inputIcon">Email address</label>
  −
  <div class="controls">
  −
    <div class="input-prepend">
  −
      <span class="add-on"><i class="icon-envelope"></i></span>
  −
      <input class="span2" id="inputIcon" type="text">
  −
    </div>
  −
  </div>
  −
</div>
  −
 
  −
the mid 1970s, attempts to control runoff flow rates from urban developments were
  −
initiated. By the late 1980s, water quality became an additional focus and in the late
  −
1990s, approaches to mitigate accelerated stream channel erosion were introduced.
  −
Lot level stormwater management approaches have been advocated in Ontario since
  −
1995 (OMMAH, 1995), but widespread application has yet to occur. Today, with
  −
improvements in our understanding of watershed systems and the potential impacts
  −
urbanization can have on aquatic ecosystems, stormwater management addresses a
  −
broad suite of issues including fluvial geomorphology (stream channel forming
  −
processes), groundwater resources and the protection of aquatic and terrestrial habitats
  −
(Figure 1.2.1).
  −
 
  −
Municipalities, with the support of conservation authorities, review stormwater
  −
management facilities and plans designed to address this multitude of concerns. This has led to an increasing complexity in stormwater management planning and design
  −
including:
      
* increasingly complex stormwater management facilities and best management practices;
 
* increasingly complex stormwater management facilities and best management practices;
Line 40: Line 8:  
* increased emphasis on the treatment train approach and use of multiple types of controls to address environmental issues.
 
* increased emphasis on the treatment train approach and use of multiple types of controls to address environmental issues.
   −
CVC and TRCA have been extensively involved in integrated watershed-wide
+
CVC and TRCA have been extensively involved in integrated watershed-wide environmental monitoring for many years. The results of this monitoring have shown that the environmental health of many watersheds continue to decline as urbanization increases. This environmental deterioration has taken place despite widespread compliance with provincial and conservation authority requirements for stormwater management planning and facility design. Conventional stormwater management, which focuses on controlling peak flow rate and the concentration of suspended solids, has failed to address the widespread and cumulative hydrologic modifications in watersheds that increase the volume of stormwater, increase the runoff rate, and cause excessive erosion and degradation of stream channels. Conventional stormwater management also fails to adequately treat other pollutants of concern, such as nutrients, pathogens and metals.
environmental monitoring for many years. The results of this monitoring have shown
  −
that the environmental health of many watersheds continue to decline as urbanization
  −
increases. This environmental deterioration has taken place despite widespread
  −
compliance with provincial and conservation authority requirements for stormwater
  −
management planning and facility design. Conventional stormwater management,
  −
which focuses on controlling peak flow rate and the concentration of suspended solids,
  −
has failed to address the widespread and cumulative hydrologic modifications in watersheds that increase the volume of stormwater, increase the runoff rate, and cause
  −
excessive erosion and degradation of stream channels. Conventional stormwater
  −
management also fails to adequately treat other pollutants of concern, such as
  −
nutrients, pathogens and metals.1
  −
 
  −
CVC’s recent Credit River Water Management Strategy Update concludes that
  −
continued use of what are currently considered “state of the art” stormwater
  −
management practices will lead to continued degradation of the watershed, jeopardizing
  −
the health of the Credit’s world class fishery and other valued environmental resources
  −
(CVC, 2007b). To protect the health of the Credit River watershed, the updated water
  −
management strategy calls for an immediate shift to more proactive and innovative
  −
stormwater management systems that include low impact development practices.
  −
TRCA’s Rouge River Watershed Plan (TRCA, 2007c), Humber River Watershed Plan
  −
(TRCA, 2008a) and Don River Watershed Plan (TRCA, 2009a) reach similar
  −
conclusions about the inability of conventional stormwater management practices to
  −
protect the health of rivers and the need for low impact development approaches. In
  −
addition, the Rouge River Watershed Plan concludes that widespread implementation of
  −
LID practices in new and existing developments could increase the resiliency of the
  −
watershed system to some anticipated impacts of climate change on baseflow and
  −
channel erosion (TRCA, 2007d).
  −
 
  −
Recent research (Aquafor Beech Ltd., 2006) has suggested that current practices to
  −
offset the hydrologic effects of urbanization are insufficient to prevent increased channel
  −
erosion and deterioration of aquatic habitats. In many cases, even small incremental
  −
changes in watershed hydrology commensurate with an increase in impermeable
  −
surfaces of 4%, can result in changes to stream channel characteristics and aquatic
  −
communities. To offset these impacts, an increased emphasis on maintaining natural
  −
water balance and replicating the predevelopment hydrologic cycle is required (Aquafor
  −
Beech Ltd., 2006).
  −
 
  −
Finally the 2003 OMOE Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual, though
  −
reflective of current technology is rapidly becoming dated, since much of the material it
  −
reviewed dates from 1999. In the last five years, over 30 state-of-the-science
  −
stormwater management manuals and guidelines have been released in locations such
  −
as Maryland, Washington State, British Columbia, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and
  −
Oregon. The objective of maintaining predevelopment water balance, use of the
  −
treatment train approach and application of low impact development practices are all
  −
becoming common practice in these jurisdictions.
  −
 
  −
Two recent documents, one prepared by the City of Toronto and the other prepared by
  −
the Greater Vancouver Regional District summarize how the approach to stormwater
  −
management needs to change.
     −
Rainwater should be treated as a resource to nourish and enhance the
+
This is why CVC and TRCA commissioned the development of the 2010 stormwater management guide, to provide guidance on the kind of cutting edge practices that are needed to protect the health of the CVC and TRCA watersheds. The LID SWM Guide draws on published research, literature and local studies to provide planning and design guidance that reflects regional policies, practices and climate. It provides information
City’s environment. Management should begin where precipitation hits
  −
the ground according to the priority of source, conveyance, end-of-pipe
  −
and finally, stream restoration measures (City of Toronto, 2006).
  −
There is a need for a change in the philosophy of treating runoff from
  −
one of stormwater management to rainwater management (GVRD,
  −
2005).
  −
This is why CVC and TRCA commissioned the development of a stormwater
  −
management guide to provide guidance on the kind of cutting edge practices that are
  −
needed to protect the health of the CVC and TRCA watersheds. The LID SWM Guide
  −
draws on published research, literature and local studies to provide planning and design
  −
guidance that reflects regional policies, practices and climate. It provides information
   
and guidance on the following:
 
and guidance on the following:
   Line 108: Line 17:  
* the kinds of environmental and performance monitoring that should be carried out.
 
* the kinds of environmental and performance monitoring that should be carried out.
   −
Acknowledging that it will not always be possible to maintain the predevelopment water
+
Acknowledging that it will not always be possible to maintain the predevelopment water budget of a site, predicted increases in runoff from land development that cannot be
budget of a site, predicted increases in runoff from land development that cannot be
+
mitigated through stormwater infiltration practices should be minimized through practices that either evapotranspire (e.g., green roofs, bioretention), or harvest runoff for
mitigated through stormwater infiltration practices should be minimized through
  −
practices that either evapotranspire (e.g., green roofs, bioretention), or harvest runoff for
   
non-potable uses (i.e., rainwater harvesting). In areas where development has already
 
non-potable uses (i.e., rainwater harvesting). In areas where development has already
 
taken place, LID can be used as a retrofit practice to reduce runoff volumes, pollutant
 
taken place, LID can be used as a retrofit practice to reduce runoff volumes, pollutant
8,255

edits

Navigation menu