Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | | |
− | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 175%; height: 200px;" | + | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; height: 200px;" |
| |- | | |- |
| !colspan="2" style="background:white; color:black"| LID Practice | | !colspan="2" style="background:white; color:black"| LID Practice |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| !colspan="13" style="background: brown; color: white"|United States | | !colspan="13" style="background: brown; color: white"|United States |
| |- | | |- |
− | !colspan="2" style="backgroung=green; color:white"|Bioretention|| CVC+TRCA (Factsheets-2010)<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/lid-swm-guide-apdxa-bioretention.pdf</ref>|| CVC-Construction Guide-2012 <ref>http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/CVC-LID-Construction-Guide-Book.pdf</ref>|| CVC-Retrofit Guide-2014<ref>http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Grey-to-Green-Road-ROW-Retrofits-Complete_1.pdf</ref> || Toronto- 2016 || LID-SWM Guide 2010<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/LID-SWM-Guide-v1.0_2010_1_no-appendices.pdf</ref>|| LID-Design Guide Edmonton- 2014<ref>https://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/PDF/LIDGuide.pdf</ref> || New York State SWM Design Manual-2015 || Massachusets SW BMP-2013 || District of Columbia-SWM Guidebook-2010 || San Diego LID Handbook-2014 || Alabama LID Handbook-2013 || W. Virginia-SWM design guidance manual-2012 || Rhode Island-SW design & Installation Standards Manual-2012 || Pennsylvania-City of Philadelphia green St. design manual-2014 || Minnesota SW Manual-2017 || Tennessee-LID Development-SWM 2016 || Texas-LID Technical Guidance Manual-2013 || Oregon SWM Manual-2014 || Oregon State Univ. Fact Sheets-2011 | + | !colspan="2" style="backgroung=green; color:white"height: 400px;|Bioretention|| CVC+TRCA (Factsheets-2010)<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/lid-swm-guide-apdxa-bioretention.pdf</ref>|| CVC-Construction Guide-2012 <ref>http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/CVC-LID-Construction-Guide-Book.pdf</ref>|| CVC-Retrofit Guide-2014<ref>http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Grey-to-Green-Road-ROW-Retrofits-Complete_1.pdf</ref> || Toronto- 2016 || LID <br>SWM <br>Guide <br>2010<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/LID-SWM-Guide-v1.0_2010_1_no-appendices.pdf</ref>|| LID-Design Guide Edmonton- 2014<ref>https://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/PDF/LIDGuide.pdf</ref> || New York State SWM Design Manual-2015 || Massachu-sets <br>SW BMP <br>2013 || District of Columbia-SWM Guidebook-2010 || San Diego LID Handbook-2014 || Alabama LID Handbook-2013 || W. Virginia-SWM design guidance manual-2012 || Rhode Island-SW design & Installation Standards Manual-2012 || Pennsylva-nia<br>Green St. <br>design manual <br>2014 || Minnesota SW Manual-2017 || Tennes-see <br>LID SWM <br>2016 || Texas-LID Technical Guidance Manual-2013 || Oregon SWM Manual-2014 || Oregon State Univ. Fact Sheets-2011 |
| |- | | |- |
| |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Filter media depth (m)''' | | |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Filter media depth (m)''' |
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | || Soluble salts || || || || < 2.0 mmhos/cm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | | | || Soluble salts || || || || < 2.0 mmhos/cm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
| |- | | |- |
− | | || Cationic exchange capacity || > 10 meq/100 g || 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 5 meq/100 g || || || > 10 || > 5 || || > 10 || || || || > 10 || || || > 5 | + | | || Cationic exchange capacity<br>(meq/100g)|| > 10 || 10 || > 10 || > 10 || > 10 || > 5 || || || > 10 || > 5 || || > 10 || || || || > 10 || || || > 5 |
| |- | | |- |
| | || pH || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || || || || 6-8 || || || || 6-7 || 6-8.5 (WQ blend) || || 6-8 || || 5.5-7.5 | | | || pH || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || || || || 6-8 || || || || 6-7 || 6-8.5 (WQ blend) || || 6-8 || || 5.5-7.5 |
Line 54: |
Line 54: |
| ||| Diameter(clear stone) || 50 mm || || || 50 mm || 50 mm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | | ||| Diameter(clear stone) || 50 mm || || || 50 mm || 50 mm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
| |- | | |- |
− | |'''Pea Gravel Choking Layer''' ||depth (mm) || 100 || || || || 100 || 100 || || || || || || || || || || || || || | + | |Pea Gravel Choking Layer ||depth (mm) || 100 || || || || 100 || 100 || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
| |- | | |- |
| ||| diameter (mm) || 3-10 || || || || 3-10 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | | ||| diameter (mm) || 3-10 || || || || 3-10 || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
Line 72: |
Line 72: |
| |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Underdrain''' | | |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Underdrain''' |
| |- | | |- |
− | ||| Required when infiltration rate || < 15 mm/hr || || || < 15 mm/hr || || < 13 mm/hr || || || || || || || || || || || || || | + | ||| Required when infiltration rate<br> (mm/hr) || < 15 || || || < 15 || || < 13 || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
| |- | | |- |
− | | ||Diameter || min. 100 mm(200 mm recommended) || min. 100 mm, 200 mm is recommended || || min. 200 mm || min. 100 mm(200 mm recommended) || 200 mm || || || || || || || || || 4 inches || || || || | + | | ||Diameter<br>(mm) || min. 100<br>(200 recd.) || min. 100<br> (200 recd.) || || min. 200 || min. 100<br>(200 mm recd.) || 200 mm || || || || || || || || || 4 inches || || || || |
| |- | | |- |
| | ||Depth above the gravel storage layer || 100 mm || || || 100 mm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || | | | ||Depth above the gravel storage layer || 100 mm || || || 100 mm || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |
Line 90: |
Line 90: |
| |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Setback from building Foundation(m)''' || 4 || || || 4 || 4 || 3 (clay), 5 (heavy clay) || || || || || || || || || see table 3 below || || || || | | |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Setback from building Foundation(m)''' || 4 || || || 4 || 4 || 3 (clay), 5 (heavy clay) || || || || || || || || || see table 3 below || || || || |
| |- | | |- |
− | |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''(Impervious drainage/treatment facility) area''' || 5:1 to 15:1 || || || 5:1 to 15:1 || 5:1 to 15:1 || || < 5:1 loading ratio (DA to IA, DA 100% IP) || SA of BR 3 to 6% of CDA || || || sized at 5-8 % of IPCDA || BR SA 3-6% of CDA || || || CDA < 5 acres || CDA < 2.5 acres || CDA < 5 acres || || BR SA: 6-15 % of IP area | + | |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''(Impervious drainage/treatment facility) area''' || 5:1 to 15:1 || || || 5:1 to 15:1 || 5:1 to 15:1 || || < 5:1 loading ratio (DA to IA, DA 100% IP) || SA of BR <br>3-6% of<br> CDA || || || sized at 5-8 % of IPCDA || BR SA 3-6% of CDA || || || CDA < 5 acres || CDA < 2.5 acres || CDA < 5 acres || || BR SA: 6-15 % of IP area |
| |- | | |- |
| |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Contributing Slope (%)''' || 1-5 || || || || 1-5 || || || || || || || || || || >1 % and < 33% || || || || | | |colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Contributing Slope (%)''' || 1-5 || || || || 1-5 || || || || || || || || || || >1 % and < 33% || || || || |