1,647
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 164:
Line 164: + Line 175:
Line 176: − + +
→Planning for climate change in LID design
|[[Bioretention]]
|[[Bioretention]]
|
|
*Hydrological performance of [[bioretention systems]] may decrease as changing rainfall patterns in Ontario increase ponding depth and time (Guram & Bashir, 2024) <ref name=Guram>Guram, S., & Bashir, R. (2024). Designing effective low-impact developments for a changing climate: A HYDRUS-based vadose zone modeling approach. Water, 16(13), 1803. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131803</ref>.
*[[Bioretention]] cell performance was simulated by Tirpak et al. (2021) <ref> Tirpak, R. A., Hathaway, J. M., Khojandi, A., Weathers, M., & Epps, T. H. (2021). Building resiliency to climate change uncertainty through bioretention design modifications. Journal of Environmental Management, 287, 112300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112300</ref> using the USEPA Storm Water Management Model to evaluate how design modifications could enhance system resilience under future climate conditions projected for Knoxville, Tennessee. Results show that expanding the bioretention surface area relative to the contributing catchment yields the strongest performance benefits under future climate conditions, especially in areas with low native soil infiltration rate.
*[[Bioretention]] cell performance was simulated by Tirpak et al. (2021) <ref> Tirpak, R. A., Hathaway, J. M., Khojandi, A., Weathers, M., & Epps, T. H. (2021). Building resiliency to climate change uncertainty through bioretention design modifications. Journal of Environmental Management, 287, 112300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112300</ref> using the USEPA Storm Water Management Model to evaluate how design modifications could enhance system resilience under future climate conditions projected for Knoxville, Tennessee. Results show that expanding the bioretention surface area relative to the contributing catchment yields the strongest performance benefits under future climate conditions, especially in areas with low native soil infiltration rate.
|-
|-
|-
|-
|Maintenance
|Maintenance
|* A study in Toronto noted that vegetated LIDs may need more irrigation to avoid wilting, since the water availability in the root zone might decrease from historical levels (Guram & Bashir, 2024) <ref name=Guram>Guram, S., & Bashir, R. (2024). Designing effective low-impact developments for a changing climate: A HYDRUS-based vadose zone modeling approach. Water, 16(13), 1803. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131803</ref>.
|
* A study in Toronto noted that vegetated LIDs may need more irrigation to avoid wilting, since the water availability in the root zone might decrease from historical levels (Guram & Bashir, 2024) <ref name=Guram>Guram, S., & Bashir, R. (2024). Designing effective low-impact developments for a changing climate: A HYDRUS-based vadose zone modeling approach. Water, 16(13), 1803. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131803</ref>.
|}
|}