Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 64: Line 64:  
==Topsoil==
 
==Topsoil==
 
{{:Topsoil}}
 
{{:Topsoil}}
==Organic components==
+
==Organic component==
This is the first big opportunity to manage phosphorus export from a [[bioretention]] or [[stormwater planter]] system. Whilst compost is the most common ingredient, designers working in sensitive watersheds are encouraged to explore the alternatives listed below. Some of these materials may be combined 50:50 with compost to balance the nutrients required by the [[plants]] and the potential for leaching of excess nutrient.   
+
This is the first big opportunity to manage phosphorus export from a [[bioretention]] or [[stormwater planter]] system. While compost is the most common choice, designers working in nutrient-sensitive receiving waters are encouraged to explore the alternatives listed below. Some of these materials may be combined 50:50 with compost to balance providing the nutrients required by the [[plants]] with limiting the potential for leaching of excess nutrients.   
 
   
 
   
 
===Compost===
 
===Compost===
Compost is the most widely used organic component. It's use in bioretention facilities is well established and documented.  Low-phosphorus composts should always be sought for use in low impact development facilities, including bioretention. These are typically created from feedstocks including yard, leaf, and wood waste, and must exclude manures, biosolids, and food scraps.<ref>Hurley S, Shrestha P, Cording A. Nutrient Leaching from Compost: Implications for Bioretention and Other Green Stormwater Infrastructure. J Sustain Water Built Environ. 2017;3(3):4017006. doi:10.1061/JSWBAY.0000821.</ref><br>
+
Compost is the most widely used organic component. It's use in bioretention facilities is well established and documented.  Low-phosphorus composts should always be sought for use in low impact development facilities, including bioretention. These are typically created from feedstocks including yard, leaf, and wood waste, and excluding manures, biosolids, and food scraps.<ref>Hurley S, Shrestha P, Cording A. Nutrient Leaching from Compost: Implications for Bioretention and Other Green Stormwater Infrastructure. J Sustain Water Built Environ. 2017;3(3):4017006. doi:10.1061/JSWBAY.0000821.</ref><br>
 
'''[[Compost|Compost Specifications]]'''
 
'''[[Compost|Compost Specifications]]'''
   −
Even low-phosphorus composts are known to export phosphorus over many years. The use of compost is not recommended in watersheds for which phosphorus pollution is a concern. There are alternatives which have undergone field study, each of which has a number of benefits and potential concerns:
+
Even low-phosphorus composts are known to export phosphorus over many years. The use of compost is not recommended in nutrient-sensitive watersheds where phosphorus pollution is a concern. There are a number of alternative sources of soil organic matter which have undergone field studies which have benefits and potential concerns:
    
{|class="wikitable"
 
{|class="wikitable"
Line 81: Line 81:  
|-
 
|-
 
!Coconut coir<ref>Rheaume, A., Hinman, C., and Ahearn, D. (2015). “A Synthesis of Bioretention Research in Pacific Northwest.” Herrera, <http://www.modularwetlands.com/new/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2-Bioretention-Synthesis-2015-DAhearn.pdf></ref>
 
!Coconut coir<ref>Rheaume, A., Hinman, C., and Ahearn, D. (2015). “A Synthesis of Bioretention Research in Pacific Northwest.” Herrera, <http://www.modularwetlands.com/new/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2-Bioretention-Synthesis-2015-DAhearn.pdf></ref>
|Doesn't leach phosphorus||Requires importation
+
|Doesn't leach phosphorus||Must be imported
 
|-
 
|-
 
!Wood chip
 
!Wood chip
Line 87: Line 87:  
|-
 
|-
 
!Peat Moss
 
!Peat Moss
|Doesn't leach phosphorus||Sustainability controversial
+
|Doesn't leach phosphorus||Must be extracted from natural wetlands
 
|-
 
|-
 
!Shredded paper <ref>Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. (2010). “Bioretention.” <http://udfcd.org/criteria-manual/volume-3/t-03-bioretention/> (Mar. 15, 2018).</ref> (see: Pittmoss)
 
!Shredded paper <ref>Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. (2010). “Bioretention.” <http://udfcd.org/criteria-manual/volume-3/t-03-bioretention/> (Mar. 15, 2018).</ref> (see: Pittmoss)
Line 95: Line 95:     
===Wood derivatives===
 
===Wood derivatives===
The 2017 guidance from New Hampshire specifically rules against the inclusion of compost in their bioretention media.<ref>UNHSC Bioretention Soil Specification. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/default/files/media/unhsc_bsm_spec_2-28-17_0.pdf</ref> Instead they recommend sphagnum peat or ''"Shredded wood, wood chips, ground bark, or wood waste; of uniform texture and free of stones, sticks"''. The use of wood chip has been common in New Hampshire for some time, in this 2006 thesis 20% wood chips (not characterized) were incorporated into all of the test cases to match current practices at the time. <ref>Stone, R. M. (2013). Evaluation and Optimization of Bioretention Design for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal. University of New Hampshire. Retrieved from https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE THESIS FINAL.pdf</ref>
+
The 2017 guidance from New Hampshire specifically rules against the inclusion of compost in their bioretention media.<ref>UNHSC Bioretention Soil Specification. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/default/files/media/unhsc_bsm_spec_2-28-17_0.pdf</ref> Instead they recommend ''"Shredded wood, wood chips, ground bark, or wood waste; of uniform texture and free of stones, sticks"''. The use of wood chip has been common in New Hampshire for some time, in this 2006 thesis 20% wood chips (not characterized) were incorporated into all of the test cases to match current practices at the time. <ref>Stone, R. M. (2013). Evaluation and Optimization of Bioretention Design for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal. University of New Hampshire. Retrieved from https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE THESIS FINAL.pdf</ref>
    
Shredded paper has been tested as an additional source of carbon and as an electron-donor to promote denitrification in a number of successful laboratory and field studies.  
 
Shredded paper has been tested as an additional source of carbon and as an electron-donor to promote denitrification in a number of successful laboratory and field studies.  

Navigation menu