Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:  
For OGS, the ISO 14034 verification process in Canada consists of two parts:
 
For OGS, the ISO 14034 verification process in Canada consists of two parts:
 
# Third party laboratory testing of MTDs in accordance with the [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/home/urban-runoff-green-infrastructure/conventional-stormwater-management/hydrodynamic-separators/procedure-for-laboratory-testing-of-oil-grit-separators/ TRCA’s Procedure for Laboratory Testing of Oil Grit Separators] and associated bulletins, and
 
# Third party laboratory testing of MTDs in accordance with the [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/home/urban-runoff-green-infrastructure/conventional-stormwater-management/hydrodynamic-separators/procedure-for-laboratory-testing-of-oil-grit-separators/ TRCA’s Procedure for Laboratory Testing of Oil Grit Separators] and associated bulletins, and
# Third party verification of the test in accordance with the [https://etvcanada.ca/home/verify-your-technology/ISO 14034 ETV standard].
+
# Third party verification of the test in accordance with the [https://etvcanada.ca/home/verify-your-technology/ ISO 14034 ETV standard].
 
The ISO 14034 verification process is currently administered by [https://etvcanada.ca/home/contact/ Globe Performance Solutions and Verify Global]. Completed ISO 14034 verification statements for OGS are posted to the [https://etvcanada.ca/home/verify-your-technology/current-verified-technologies/ website, here].
 
The ISO 14034 verification process is currently administered by [https://etvcanada.ca/home/contact/ Globe Performance Solutions and Verify Global]. Completed ISO 14034 verification statements for OGS are posted to the [https://etvcanada.ca/home/verify-your-technology/current-verified-technologies/ website, here].
   Line 29: Line 29:  
!style="width: 40%;"|Technology Name
 
!style="width: 40%;"|Technology Name
 
!style="width: 25%;"|Company Name
 
!style="width: 25%;"|Company Name
!style="width: 25%;"|Fact Sheet
+
!style="width: 25%;"|Verification Statements
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''2022'''
 
|'''2022'''
 
|RWM-DM-1200 & DM-1200-OS Stormwater Systems
 
|RWM-DM-1200 & DM-1200-OS Stormwater Systems
 
|Rainwater Management LTD.
 
|Rainwater Management LTD.
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ISO-14034-ETV-Verification-Statement_RWM-DM-1200_2022-2025.pdf Fact Sheet]
+
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ISO-14034-ETV-Verification-Statement_RWM-DM-1200_2022-2025.pdf Verification Statement]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''2019'''
 
|'''2019'''
 
|Hydro International Downstream Defender® OGS
 
|Hydro International Downstream Defender® OGS
 
|Hydro International
 
|Hydro International
|[https://www.verifiglobal.com/media/tsmpnsdh/vg-2019-09-01-hi-downstream-defender-verification-statement-re-issue-v2-for-posting-2022-09-15.pdf?la=da Fact Sheet]
+
|[https://www.verifiglobal.com/media/tsmpnsdh/vg-2019-09-01-hi-downstream-defender-verification-statement-re-issue-v2-for-posting-2022-09-15.pdf?la=da Verification Statement]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''2019'''
 
|'''2019'''
 
|SciCLONE™ Hydrodynamic Separator
 
|SciCLONE™ Hydrodynamic Separator
 
|Bio Clean Environmental Inc. (A Forterra Company)
 
|Bio Clean Environmental Inc. (A Forterra Company)
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ISO14034-Verification-Statement_BioClean-SciCLONE_2022-2025.pdf Fact Sheet]
+
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ISO14034-Verification-Statement_BioClean-SciCLONE_2022-2025.pdf Verification Statement]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''2018'''
 
|'''2018'''
 
|Hydro International First Defense® OGS
 
|Hydro International First Defense® OGS
 
|Hydro International
 
|Hydro International
|[https://www.verifiglobal.com/media/xr3he5i2/vg-2018-10-01-hi-fdhc-final-for-posting-2018-10-15-rev-2019-02-01.pdf Fact Sheet]
+
|[https://www.verifiglobal.com/media/xr3he5i2/vg-2018-10-01-hi-fdhc-final-for-posting-2018-10-15-rev-2019-02-01.pdf Verification Statement]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''2018'''
 
|'''2018'''
 
|Hydroworks® HydroStorm (HS) OGS
 
|Hydroworks® HydroStorm (HS) OGS
 
|HydroWorks, LLC
 
|HydroWorks, LLC
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ISO14034-VS_Hydroworks_HS_2021-2024.pdf Fact Sheet]
+
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ISO14034-VS_Hydroworks_HS_2021-2024.pdf Verification Statement]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''2017'''
 
|'''2017'''
 
|Stormceptor® EF and EFO Oil-Grit Separators
 
|Stormceptor® EF and EFO Oil-Grit Separators
 
|Imbrium Systems, Inc.,  
 
|Imbrium Systems, Inc.,  
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ISO-14034-Verification-Statement-_Stormceptor_EF-EFO_2020-2023.pdf Fact Sheet]
+
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ISO-14034-Verification-Statement-_Stormceptor_EF-EFO_2020-2023.pdf Verification Statement]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''2017'''
 
|'''2017'''
 
|CDS Hydrodynamic Separator®
 
|CDS Hydrodynamic Separator®
 
|CONTECH Engineered Solutions LLC
 
|CONTECH Engineered Solutions LLC
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ISO-14034-ETV-Verification-Renewal-Contech-CDS_2020-2023-Final_r1.pdf Fact Sheet]
+
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ISO-14034-ETV-Verification-Renewal-Contech-CDS_2020-2023-Final_r1.pdf Verification Statement]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''2016'''
 
|'''2016'''
 
|SDD3 Oil Grit Separator®
 
|SDD3 Oil Grit Separator®
 
|Next Stormwater Solutions (8091200 Canada Inc.)  
 
|Next Stormwater Solutions (8091200 Canada Inc.)  
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ISO-14034-ETV-Verification-Renewal-NEXT-SDD3_2019-2022.pdf Fact Sheet]
+
|[https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ISO-14034-ETV-Verification-Renewal-NEXT-SDD3_2019-2022.pdf Verification Statement]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 79: Line 79:  
# '''Light liquid capture and retention test''':  An optional test in which beads with a density similar to motor oil are pre-loaded into the unit and the number of beads in the effluent are measured to assess the capacity of the unit to trap and retain light liquids.  
 
# '''Light liquid capture and retention test''':  An optional test in which beads with a density similar to motor oil are pre-loaded into the unit and the number of beads in the effluent are measured to assess the capacity of the unit to trap and retain light liquids.  
   −
There are currently eight OGS vendors with ISO 14034 verifications (as shown in the [[Oil and Grit Separator#Testing and Verification|table]] above). The list of manufacturers and test results of all OGS products and other verified technologies can be found [https://etvcanada.ca/home/verify-your-technology/current-verified-technologies/ here]. Sediment removal performance results were relatively consistent across different MTD designs, with slightly more variation at higher surface loading rates (see Graph below). <br>  
+
There are currently eight OGS vendors with ISO 14034 verifications (as shown in the [[Oil and Grit Separator#Testing and Verification|table]] above). A summary of OGS MTD test results from the verification statements is provided [https://etvcanada.ca/home/verify-your-technology/current-verified-technologies/ here]
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
The list of manufacturers and test results of all OGS products and other verified technologies can be downloaded here: <br>
 +
{{Clickable button|[[File:ISO ETV 14034 verified OGS MTD Test Results.pdf]]|Download Verification Test Results (.pdf)}}
 +
<br>
 +
</br>
 +
 
 +
Sediment removal performance results were relatively consistent across different MTD designs, with slightly more variation at higher surface loading rates (see Graph below). <br>  
 
'''<small>*Note:''' Oil Grit Separators do not achieve the 80% removal efficiency required for stand alone application in Ontario, even at very low flow rates.</small>
 
'''<small>*Note:''' Oil Grit Separators do not achieve the 80% removal efficiency required for stand alone application in Ontario, even at very low flow rates.</small>
    
</br>
 
</br>
[[File:OGS-Protocol-Webpage-Image.jpg|thumb|320px|In lab testing of a Stormceptor OGS device, here seen testing discharge rates and sediment effluent loads at St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Saddoris, et al. 2010)<ref>Saddoris, D.A., McIntire, K.D., Mohseni, O., and J.S. Gulliver, 2010.  Hydrodynamic Separator Sediment Retention Testing – Final Report. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.</ref>]]
+
[[File:OGS-Protocol-Webpage-Image.jpg|thumb|320px|Performance testing of an OGS unit in St Anthony Falls Laboratory in Minnesota (Saddoris, et al. 2010)<ref>Saddoris, D.A., McIntire, K.D., Mohseni, O., and J.S. Gulliver, 2010.  Hydrodynamic Separator Sediment Retention Testing – Final Report. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.</ref>]]
 
[[File:OGS min Max.png|900px]]<br>
 
[[File:OGS min Max.png|900px]]<br>
 
</br>
 
</br>
Line 95: Line 103:     
==Sizing==
 
==Sizing==
[[File:OGS Calculation Tool.PNG|thumb|450px|See a screenshot of a recent version of the ''OGS Review Calculator'' used for developers/manufacturers of new OGS MTDs to help with the submission of their devices to the International Working Group on Environmental Technology Verification (IWG-ETV) (Photo Source: City of Toronto, 2020)<ref>City of Toronto. 2020. Proposed Manufactured Treatment Devices Guidelines. Version 0.0. Accessed: https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/9495-Draft-for-Feedback_Proposed-MTD-Guidelines_3-Mar-20_a.pdf</ref>]]
+
[[File:OGS Calculation Tool UPDATE.png|thumb|450px|link=https://wiki.sustainabletechnologies.ca/images/6/62/OGS_Review_Sheet_LOCKED_UPDATE.xlsx|See a screenshot of a recent version of STEP’s OGS Review Sheet Calculator used for developers/manufacturers of new OGS MTDs to help with the submission of their devices to the International Working Group on Environmental Technology Verification (IWG-ETV) (Photo Source: City of Toronto, 2020)<ref>City of Toronto. 2020. Proposed Manufactured Treatment Devices Guidelines. Version 0.0. Accessed: https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/9495-Draft-for-Feedback_Proposed-MTD-Guidelines_3-Mar-20_a.pdf</ref>]]
   −
It is recommended that a standard sizing approach be used for all OGS units to ensure they are evaluated based on a consistent methodology. See a screenshot of the City of Toronto's and STEP's '''''OGS Review Calculator''''' has been developed to facilitate application of ISO 14034 ETV test data through a standard approach applicable to all OGS MTD designs. The following methods and processes are built into the tool:<br>
+
It is recommended that a standard sizing approach be used for all OGS units to ensure they are evaluated based on a consistent methodology. See a screenshot of STEP's '''''OGS Review Sheet''''', which has been developed to facilitate application of ISO 14034 ETV test data through a standard approach applicable to all OGS MTD designs. Click the button below to download an excel version of the tool:
'''Rational Method''' used as a basis for flow calculations:<br>
+
<br>
<math>Q = CiA</math>
+
<br>
**<math>C</math> is the site runoff coefficient,
+
{{Clickable button|[[File:Cover OGS review sheet.PNG|320 px|link=https://wiki.sustainabletechnologies.ca/images/6/62/OGS_Review_Sheet_LOCKED_UPDATE.xlsx]]}}
**<math>i</math> is the rainfall intensity, and;
+
<br>
**<math>A</math> is the drainage area)
+
<br>
 +
The following methods and processes are built into the tool:<br>
 +
*'''Rational Method''' used as a basis for flow calculations:<br>
 
* Target treatment is based on capture and treatment of the average annual runoff volume for the site using ISO 14034 verified sediment removal test results for 7 surface loading rates
 
* Target treatment is based on capture and treatment of the average annual runoff volume for the site using ISO 14034 verified sediment removal test results for 7 surface loading rates
 
* Linear interpolation is used to calculate sediment removal efficiencies between the ISO/ETV tested surface loading rates
 
* Linear interpolation is used to calculate sediment removal efficiencies between the ISO/ETV tested surface loading rates
 
* Surface loading rates below the lowest ISO/ETV tested surface loading rate are assigned a sediment removal efficiency equal to that of the lowest tested rate
 
* Surface loading rates below the lowest ISO/ETV tested surface loading rate are assigned a sediment removal efficiency equal to that of the lowest tested rate
* Hourly historical rainfall data (minimum 20 years) are used to generate the rainfall intensity distribution curve.
+
* Hourly historical rainfall data greater than 1mm for the April to October period are used to generate the rainfall intensity frequency distribution curves.
* Capacity to add historical rainfall record is provided in order to generate the relationship between hourly rainfall intensities vs average annual rainfall volume for the meteorologic station of choice.
+
* Users may input their own rainfall intensity frequency distribution curve data for meteorological stations not provided in the tool.
    
===Associated Documents Submitted with OGS Review Calculator===
 
===Associated Documents Submitted with OGS Review Calculator===

Navigation menu