Difference between revisions of "Nutrients"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Nutrient pollution has been noted as a critical environmental, public health, and economic concern in Canada, Great Lakes, Lake Winnipeg, Lac St. Charles, Lake Simcoe and other water bodies (CWN, 2017<ref name="example1">CWN (Canadian Water Network). (2017). Nutrient Management—Research Insights for Decision Makers. CWN Report, November, 26.</ref>). Nutrient pollution can cause environmental imbalance, pose a public health risk for drinking water (USEPA, 2009<ref>United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2009. Managing Stormwater Runoff to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water. Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.</ref>) and swimming, as inhalation of algae by swimmers or pet can cause hypoxic condition. It can also affect the economy by harming fisheries, tourism, recreation, and increase the treatment cost of drinking water. Historical algal bloom in the Lake Erie during 1960s caused a substantial decline of native aquatic species (CWN, 2017<ref name="example1" />). In 2015 more than 5,000 km<sup>2</sup> of Lake Erie was covered by algal blooms rendering the water unsuitable for drinking for residents of Pelee Island, Ontario and Toledo, Ohio (CWN, 2017<ref name="example1" />). In 2011 and 2014, severe nutrient pollution in this lake caused service interruption, equal to $71 million and $65 million USD (Bingham, Sinha, & Lupi, 2015<ref>Bingham, M., Sinha, S. K., & Lupi, F. (2015). Economic benefits of reducing harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie. Retrieved from International Joint Commission website: http://ijc.org/fi les/tinymce/uploaded/Publications/Economic-Benefits-Due-to-Reduction-in-HABs-October-2015.pdf</ref>). Reports of nutrient pollution are increasing across Canada causing more beach closures and decline in water quality and fisheries (CWN, 2017<ref name="example1" />). | Nutrient pollution has been noted as a critical environmental, public health, and economic concern in Canada, Great Lakes, Lake Winnipeg, Lac St. Charles, Lake Simcoe and other water bodies (CWN, 2017<ref name="example1">CWN (Canadian Water Network). (2017). Nutrient Management—Research Insights for Decision Makers. CWN Report, November, 26.</ref>). Nutrient pollution can cause environmental imbalance, pose a public health risk for drinking water (USEPA, 2009<ref>United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2009. Managing Stormwater Runoff to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water. Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.</ref>) and swimming, as inhalation of algae by swimmers or pet can cause hypoxic condition. It can also affect the economy by harming fisheries, tourism, recreation, and increase the treatment cost of drinking water. Historical algal bloom in the Lake Erie during 1960s caused a substantial decline of native aquatic species (CWN, 2017<ref name="example1" />). In 2015 more than 5,000 km<sup>2</sup> of Lake Erie was covered by algal blooms rendering the water unsuitable for drinking for residents of Pelee Island, Ontario and Toledo, Ohio (CWN, 2017<ref name="example1" />). In 2011 and 2014, severe nutrient pollution in this lake caused service interruption, equal to $71 million and $65 million USD (Bingham, Sinha, & Lupi, 2015<ref>Bingham, M., Sinha, S. K., & Lupi, F. (2015). Economic benefits of reducing harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie. Retrieved from International Joint Commission website: http://ijc.org/fi les/tinymce/uploaded/Publications/Economic-Benefits-Due-to-Reduction-in-HABs-October-2015.pdf</ref>). Reports of nutrient pollution are increasing across Canada causing more beach closures and decline in water quality and fisheries (CWN, 2017<ref name="example1" />). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Excessive algal growth requires both phosphorus and nitrogen. While in some environments nitrogen is considered to be the limiting nutrient that controls such growth, phosphorus has been considered as the main limiting factor in most freshwaters (Howarth & Marino, 2006<ref>Howarth, R. W., & Marino, R. (2006). Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: Evolving views over three decades. Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 364-376. doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0364</ref>; Schindler et al., 2016<ref>Schindler, D. W., Carpenter, S. R., Chapra, S. C., Hecky, R. E., & Orihel, D. M. (2016). Reducing phosphorus to curb lake eutrophication is a success. Environmental Science & Technology, 50, 8923-8929. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02204.</ref>). Therefore, controlling the load of phosphorous leaving a sub-watershed can reduce the chances of nutrient pollution in receiving surface waters. Formation of policies such as Lake Simcoe Phosphorous Offsetting Policy (LSPOP) are examples of such an approach. LSPOP requires a Zero Export Target where all new developments should control 100% of phosphorus from leaving the property (LSRCA, 2021<ref>LSRCA (Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority). (2021). Phosphorus Offsetting Policy. July). Available at: https://www.lsrca.on.ca/Shared%20Documents/Phosphorus_Offsetting_Policy.pdf.</ref>). | ||
| + | |||
| + | In addition to contaminating surface waters, abundance of nutrients can also contaminate the ground waters. Contrary to surface waters, nitrogen is the primary nutrient of concern regarding groundwater quality. Hobbie, et al. (2017<ref>) reported that only 22 % of phosphorous is retained within its watershed, while the same estimated for nitrogen is 80%. Therefore, most of the nitrogen is leached in the groundwater or transformed through denitrification. Phosphorus retained in the watershed is often in particle form. Therefore, it tends to be bound to soil particles and retained in the vadose zone (area between ground surface and the groundwater table). However, nitrogen is often available in dissolved form which is more mobile and bioavailable. Thus, it can travel through the vadose zone and contaminate the groundwater. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 18:02, 27 September 2022
Overview[edit]
Nutrients are an essential part of life, however excess amounts of them can harm the environment. Anthropogenic activities can lead to such excessive amount of nutrients in runoff and cause degradation of receiving waters. Phosphorus and Nitrogen are the main nutrients of concern in stormwater runoff. This page provides information on the sources of nutrients, the issues caused by their excess amounts, and strategies to manage them.
Nutrient pollution[edit]
The primary concern with excess amounts of nutrients is eutrophication (U.S. EPA 1999[2]). Eutrophication is the process of excessive algae growth due to abundance of nutrients that can cause hypoxic condition in water. Excessive algal growth can cover the surface of water and prevent light penetration. Without light, the desirable aquatic plants die off. The eventual decay of aquatic plants and algae, consumes the dissolved oxygen in the water and creates hypoxic condition that can kill fish and other aquatic animals.
Nutrient pollution has been noted as a critical environmental, public health, and economic concern in Canada, Great Lakes, Lake Winnipeg, Lac St. Charles, Lake Simcoe and other water bodies (CWN, 2017[3]). Nutrient pollution can cause environmental imbalance, pose a public health risk for drinking water (USEPA, 2009[4]) and swimming, as inhalation of algae by swimmers or pet can cause hypoxic condition. It can also affect the economy by harming fisheries, tourism, recreation, and increase the treatment cost of drinking water. Historical algal bloom in the Lake Erie during 1960s caused a substantial decline of native aquatic species (CWN, 2017[3]). In 2015 more than 5,000 km2 of Lake Erie was covered by algal blooms rendering the water unsuitable for drinking for residents of Pelee Island, Ontario and Toledo, Ohio (CWN, 2017[3]). In 2011 and 2014, severe nutrient pollution in this lake caused service interruption, equal to $71 million and $65 million USD (Bingham, Sinha, & Lupi, 2015[5]). Reports of nutrient pollution are increasing across Canada causing more beach closures and decline in water quality and fisheries (CWN, 2017[3]).
Excessive algal growth requires both phosphorus and nitrogen. While in some environments nitrogen is considered to be the limiting nutrient that controls such growth, phosphorus has been considered as the main limiting factor in most freshwaters (Howarth & Marino, 2006[6]; Schindler et al., 2016[7]). Therefore, controlling the load of phosphorous leaving a sub-watershed can reduce the chances of nutrient pollution in receiving surface waters. Formation of policies such as Lake Simcoe Phosphorous Offsetting Policy (LSPOP) are examples of such an approach. LSPOP requires a Zero Export Target where all new developments should control 100% of phosphorus from leaving the property (LSRCA, 2021[8]).
In addition to contaminating surface waters, abundance of nutrients can also contaminate the ground waters. Contrary to surface waters, nitrogen is the primary nutrient of concern regarding groundwater quality. Hobbie, et al. (2017<ref>) reported that only 22 % of phosphorous is retained within its watershed, while the same estimated for nitrogen is 80%. Therefore, most of the nitrogen is leached in the groundwater or transformed through denitrification. Phosphorus retained in the watershed is often in particle form. Therefore, it tends to be bound to soil particles and retained in the vadose zone (area between ground surface and the groundwater table). However, nitrogen is often available in dissolved form which is more mobile and bioavailable. Thus, it can travel through the vadose zone and contaminate the groundwater.
References[edit]
- ↑ Osman, M., Takaijudin, H., Massoudieh, A. and H.W., Goh. 2022. Effects of Vegetation and Saturated Zone in Cascaded Bioretention on Enhancing Nutrient Removal. Environmental Engineering Research, 28(3), p.220154.
- ↑ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1999). Preliminary data summary of urban storm water best management practices. Pub. No. EPA-821-R-99-012, Washington, DC.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 CWN (Canadian Water Network). (2017). Nutrient Management—Research Insights for Decision Makers. CWN Report, November, 26.
- ↑ United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2009. Managing Stormwater Runoff to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water. Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
- ↑ Bingham, M., Sinha, S. K., & Lupi, F. (2015). Economic benefits of reducing harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie. Retrieved from International Joint Commission website: http://ijc.org/fi les/tinymce/uploaded/Publications/Economic-Benefits-Due-to-Reduction-in-HABs-October-2015.pdf
- ↑ Howarth, R. W., & Marino, R. (2006). Nitrogen as the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems: Evolving views over three decades. Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 364-376. doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0364
- ↑ Schindler, D. W., Carpenter, S. R., Chapra, S. C., Hecky, R. E., & Orihel, D. M. (2016). Reducing phosphorus to curb lake eutrophication is a success. Environmental Science & Technology, 50, 8923-8929. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02204.
- ↑ LSRCA (Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority). (2021). Phosphorus Offsetting Policy. July). Available at: https://www.lsrca.on.ca/Shared%20Documents/Phosphorus_Offsetting_Policy.pdf.