Line 375: |
Line 375: |
| ==Places of worship== | | ==Places of worship== |
| [[File:Landforms of a place of worship.JPG|thumb|Source areas within a typical place of worship]] | | [[File:Landforms of a place of worship.JPG|thumb|Source areas within a typical place of worship]] |
| + | |
| + | Each distinct area of your site can be a source for runoff |
| + | (referred to as a ‘source area’). One or more of these areas |
| + | should be targeted when introducing LID at your place of |
| + | worship. |
| + | ===Targeting hard surfaces=== |
| + | Hard surfaces such as parking lots are a great opportunity to |
| + | implement LID. Parking lots are the main source of runoff and |
| + | represent the most significant source of stormwater pollutants |
| + | coming from your site. |
| + | Parking lots at places of worship are typically busy only on |
| + | select days of the week when groups gather for prayer or |
| + | other community activities. Due to this intermittent schedule, |
| + | parking lots at these facilities are often rented for other |
| + | purposes during times of low usage. On sites where peak |
| + | demand does not approach the total capacity of the lot, |
| + | consider reducing the parking surface. |
| + | Retrofit options for these large parking lot areas include |
| + | permeable pavement, bioswales and bioretention areas. |
| + | A benefit of permeable pavement systems is that they often |
| + | have a longer lifespan than conventional infrastructure. |
| + | The freeze-thaw cycle of the Ontario climate is tough on |
| + | pavement. Frost heaving and slumping can cause cracks and |
| + | potholes because of the expansion and contraction of water. |
| + | The expected lifespan for conventional asphalt pavement |
| + | in a northern climate, such as Ontario, is approximately 15 to |
| + | 20 years. A well-maintained porous asphalt system can last for |
| + | over 30 years, and permeable interlocking concrete pavers |
| + | can have a design life of 20 to 25 years or greater. |
| + | Using LID techniques to manage stormwater can also |
| + | eliminate or reduce the need for an on-site storm sewer |
| + | system. By eliminating piping, failure points in the pavement, |
| + | such as areas around catch basins and manholes, can be |
| + | eliminated. A design that does not use storm sewers also |
| + | negates the need to replace on-site piping, thereby saving |
| + | long-term infrastructure replacement costs. |
| + | Prefabricated modular infiltration chambers are gaining |
| + | acceptance because they are easy to integrate with parking |
| + | lot functions. These subsurface systems are typically installed |
| + | over a coarse granular reservoir to provide water storage and |
| + | allow infiltration into native soils. Infiltration chambers under |
| + | conventional asphalt systems work well on sites where parking |
| + | demand does not allow space for a stormwater feature. |
| + | |
| + | ===Landscaped areas=== |
| + | |
| + | Landscaped or lawn areas adjacent to the parking lot or |
| + | building present opportunities for implementation of LID |
| + | practices such as bioswales and bioretention areas. These |
| + | areas typically accept runoff from nearby hard surfaces and |
| + | provide water quality and water balance benefits. |
| + | |
| + | ===Roof options=== |
| + | |
| + | Rainwater harvesting systems can be simple or complex |
| + | depending on the architecture and roof drainage patterns of |
| + | your building. Many places of worship have peaked roofs with |
| + | piping to convey water from the rooftop. If your site is set up |
| + | this way, it can be easy to integrate harvesting systems into |
| + | the landscape surrounding your building. |
| + | Roof runoff can also be directed to soakaways located on |
| + | passive use areas around your building. Due to the relatively |
| + | good quality of this runoff, pre-treatment devices are not |
| + | required. |
| + | |
| + | ===Source Areas=== |
| + | The LID option that best fits your site will depend what types |
| + | of source areas are present. Types of source areas include: |
| + | * Active use area |
| + | * Passive use area |
| + | * Pedestrian walkway |
| + | * Internal driveway |
| + | * Parking lot |
| + | |
| + | On park sites, pollution prevention is often associated with |
| + | changes to operations and maintenance practices and has |
| + | not been included in Table 6.3.1. An aerial photo of a park |
| + | with each of these source areas accompanies Table 6.3.1. |
| + | Options and implementation strategies for a few of these |
| + | source areas will give you some ideas for your park site. |
| + | |
| + | The scale |
| + | of your LID retrofit project will largely determine how you will |
| + | proceed. You can usually complete |
| + | small-scale LID projects with in-house expertise and |
| + | resources. Large-scale projects will require external support |
| + | from consultants and contractors. |
| + | |
| + | ===Small-scale projects=== |
| + | |
| + | Starting with small-scale projects is a good strategy to |
| + | increase interest within your community, determine if |
| + | support is available from stakeholder groups and gain retrofit |
| + | experience. Small-scale projects include retrofitting your |
| + | property with landscape alternatives, rain barrels or using |
| + | pollution prevention strategies and practices. |
| + | |
| + | Small-scale projects require few resources and a |
| + | small project budget because: |
| + | * They do not require integration into capital works projects |
| + | * Engineering consultants are not required |
| + | * Contractors are not required |
| + | * External approvals are not required |
| + | * Consultation with the public is limited |
| + | Due to the less significant financial commitment, it can be |
| + | easier to build the case for support for small-scale projects. |
| + | A successful small-scale LID retrofit project on your property |
| + | is a good indication that you are ready to take on a more |
| + | intensive retrofit project. You now know the resources that Large-scale projects |
| + | Large-scale projects require significantly more effort, budget, |
| + | and staff than small-scale projects. Large-scale LID retrofits |
| + | include: |
| + | * Bioretention |
| + | * Enhanced grass swales |
| + | * Bioswales |
| + | * Perforated pipe systems |
| + | * Permeable pavement |
| + | * Soakaways |
| + | * Infiltration chambers |
| + | * Rainwater harvesting (excluding rain barrels) |
| + | * Prefabricated modules |
| + | * Green roofs |
| + | |
| + | Consider a large-scale project if your place of worship is |
| + | striving to be a community leader in sustainability. Large-scale |
| + | projects are often highly visible and attract more public |
| + | attention. They may also be the only solution |
| + | to site-specific challenges, like poor drainage. Before starting |
| + | a large-scale retrofit project consider the distinctions that set |
| + | these retrofits apart from small-scale projects. |
| + | |
| + | ===Integration with long-term infrastructure replacement and rehabilitation plans=== |
| + | |
| + | Most large-scale LID retrofits must function with existing |
| + | site infrastructure, such as storm sewers, catch basins, |
| + | and pavement systems. The construction of large-scale |
| + | LID practices often requires these systems to be removed, |
| + | exposed, or replaced. The best time for this type of project is when an infrastructure replacement or rehabilitation |
| + | project is already planned. |
| + | Maintenance programs and budgets that take into consideration |
| + | the expected life cycle of critical site components, including |
| + | parking lot and roofs, are valuable resources for large-scale |
| + | projects. If the replacement of these features is forecasted in |
| + | your site budget well in advance, asses if it is advantageous |
| + | to incorporate LID retrofits into these projects. Remember, |
| + | sharing construction materials, construction equipment, staff |
| + | resources, and time will reduce the budget for your retrofit. |
| + | For example, installing bioretention, infiltration chambers, |
| + | or permeable pavement in a parking lot will require the |
| + | existing pavement to be removed. Budget and resources that |
| + | have been set aside for a parking lot replacement could be |
| + | transferred to the LID retrofit project. |
| + | |
| + | ===Involvement of consultants and contractors=== |
| + | |
| + | Consultants are required for large-scale retrofit projects, |
| + | specifically for the final screening of options, pre-design, |
| + | detailed design, tender and contract documents, construction |
| + | supervision and administration, and assumption and |
| + | verification. |
| + | |
| + | Site contractors are also required for large-scale LID retrofits. |
| + | Contractors should be pre-qualified based on previous |
| + | experience with similar LID projects. |
| + | |
| + | External approvals |
| + | Large-scale retrofits may require a variety of approvals at the |
| + | municipal, watershed, provincial, and/or federal level. |
| + | Since LID is still relatively new, you may encounter policies |
| + | or bylaws that present barriers to LID retrofit projects. |
| + | Alternatively, the municipality may have to amend or enforce |
| + | some policies and bylaws to facilitate the implementation of |
| + | LID projects on your site. |
| | | |
| {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center;" | | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: center;" |
Line 403: |
Line 576: |
| |style="text-align: left;" |Building || * || * || * || ** || ** || * || ** || o || o || * | | |style="text-align: left;" |Building || * || * || * || ** || ** || * || ** || o || o || * |
| |} | | |} |
| + | |
| + | ===stuff to maybe integrate into the above=== |
| + | |
| + | '''Figure 6.3.1: When considering any parking lot retrofit, first determine if the parking spaces provided are consistent with the''' |
| + | demand. In place of worship, the demand will fluctuate. (Source: CVC) |
| + | |
| + | '''Did you know that green roofs can help''' |
| + | reduce your heating and cooling costs? |
| + | These systems absorb heat and act as |
| + | insulators for buildings. It has been estimated |
| + | that a 3,000 m2 green roof on a one story |
| + | building in Toronto could reduce the cost of |
| + | cooling a building in the summer by 6% and |
| + | the cost of heating a building by 10% in the |
| + | winter23. |
| + | |
| [[Category: Planning]] | | [[Category: Planning]] |