2,148
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 197:
Line 197: − + − + − + − + − March/April.</ref> + Line 207:
Line 207: − + − + − + + Line 216:
Line 217: − + − + − + − paver and crushed stone driveways in Connecticut. Water Research 40: 826-832.</ref>+ − + − + − + Line 250:
Line 251: − +
→Water Balance
!'''Reference'''
!'''Reference'''
|-
|-
|rowspan="6" style="text-align: center;" | Permeable pavement without underdrain
|rowspan="7" style="text-align: center;" | Permeable pavement without underdrain
|style="text-align: center;" |Guelph, Ontario
|-
|style="text-align: center;" |90%
|style="text-align: center;" |King City, Ontario
|style="text-align: center;" |James (2002)<ref>James, W. 2002. Green Roads: Research into Permeable Pavers. Stormwater.
|style="text-align: center;" |'''<u><span title="Note: In this study, there was no underdrain in the pavement base, but an underdrain was located 1 m below the native soils to allow for sampling of infiltrated water. Temporary water storage fluctuations in the base were similar to those expected in a no underdrain design." >99%*</span></u>'''
|style="text-align: center;" |<span class="plainlinks">[https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2013/03/PP_FactsheetSept2011-compressed.pdf TRCA (2008)]</span><ref>TRCA. 2008. Permeable Pavement and Bioretention Swale Demonstration Project. Seneca College, King City, Ontario. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2013/03/PP_FactsheetSept2011-compressed.pdf</ref>
|-
|-
|style="text-align: center;" |Pennsylvania
|style="text-align: center;" |Pennsylvania
|style="text-align: center;" |Kwiatkowski et al. (2007)<ref name="example1">Kwiatkowski, M., Welker, A.L., Traver, R.G., Vanacore, M., Ladd. T. 2007. Evaluation of an infiltration best management practice utilizing pervious concrete. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. Vol. 43. No. 5. pp. 1208-1222.</ref>
|style="text-align: center;" |Kwiatkowski et al. (2007)<ref name="example1">Kwiatkowski, M., Welker, A.L., Traver, R.G., Vanacore, M., Ladd. T. 2007. Evaluation of an infiltration best management practice utilizing pervious concrete. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. Vol. 43. No. 5. pp. 1208-1222.</ref>
|-
|-
|style="text-align: center;" |France
|style="text-align: center;" |Connecticut
|style="text-align: center;" |97%
|style="text-align: center;" |'''<u><span title="Note: Runoff reduction estimates are based on differences in runoff volume between the practice and a conventional impervious surface over the period of monitoring." >72%*</span></u>'''
|style="text-align: center;" |Legret and Colandini (1999)<ref>Legret, M and V. Colandani. 1999. Effects of a porous pavement structure with a reservoir structure on runoff water: water quality and fate of metals. Water Science and Technology. 39(2): 111-117</ref>
|style="text-align: center;" |Gilbert and Clausen (2006)<ref>Gilbert, J. and J. Clausen. 2006. Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from asphalt,
paver and crushed stone driveways in Connecticut. Water Research 40: 826-832.</ref>
|-
|-
|style="text-align: center;" |Washington
|style="text-align: center;" |Washington
performance of permeable pavement systems. Water Research 37(18): 4369-4376 </ref>
performance of permeable pavement systems. Water Research 37(18): 4369-4376 </ref>
|-
|-
|style="text-align: center;" |Connecticut
|style="text-align: center;" |Guelph, Ontario
|style="text-align: center;" |'''<u><span title="Note: Runoff reduction estimates are based on differences in runoff volume between the practice and a conventional impervious surface over the period of monitoring." >72%*</span></u>'''
|style="text-align: center;" |90%
|style="text-align: center;" |Gilbert and Clausen (2006)<ref>Gilbert, J. and J. Clausen. 2006. Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from asphalt,
|style="text-align: center;" |James (2002)<ref>James, W. 2002. Green Roads: Research into Permeable Pavers. Stormwater.
March/April.</ref>
|-
|-
|style="text-align: center;" |King City, Ontario
|style="text-align: center;" |France
|style="text-align: center;" |'''<u><span title="Note: In this study, there was no underdrain in the pavement base, but an underdrain was located 1 m below the native soils to allow for sampling of infiltrated water. Temporary water storage fluctuations in the base were similar to those expected in a no underdrain design." >99%*</span></u>'''
|style="text-align: center;" |97%
|style="text-align: center;" |<span class="plainlinks">[https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2013/03/PP_FactsheetSept2011-compressed.pdf TRCA (2008)]</span>
|style="text-align: center;" |Legret and Colandini (1999)<ref>Legret, M and V. Colandani. 1999. Effects of a porous pavement structure with a reservoir structure on runoff water: water quality and fate of metals. Water Science and Technology. 39(2): 111-117</ref>
|-
|-
|rowspan="10" style="text-align: center;" | Permeable pavement with underdrain
|rowspan="10" style="text-align: center;" | Permeable pavement with underdrain
|style="text-align: center;" |Mississauga
|style="text-align: center;" |Mississauga
|style="text-align: center;" |61 to 99%
|style="text-align: center;" |61 to 99%
|style="text-align: center;" |<span class="plainlinks">[https://cvc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/IMAX-Low-Impact-Development-Monitoring-Case-Study-may-24.pdf CVC (2018)]</span>
|style="text-align: center;" |<span class="plainlinks">[https://cvc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/IMAX-Low-Impact-Development-Monitoring-Case-Study-may-24.pdf CVC (2018)]</span><ref>CVC. 2018. Case Study: Monitoring Low Impact Development at the IMAX demonstration site. February, 2018. https://cvc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/IMAX-Low-Impact-Development-Monitoring-Case-Study-may-24.pdf</ref>
|-
|-
|style="text-align: center;" |Montreal
|style="text-align: center;" |Montreal