Difference between revisions of "Infiltration Trench: Life Cycle Costs"
Dean Young (talk | contribs) |
Dean Young (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Design Assumptions== | ==Design Assumptions== | ||
+ | |||
Infiltration trenches are an ideal technology for installing below any type of landscape with requirements to infiltrate excess stormwater while safely conveying excess flows during major storm events. Components include: reservoir [[aggregates| aggregate]] to store runoff water, perforated pipe to deliver and distribute flow to the trench, [[geotextile]], [[Inlets|inlet structures]], [[Pretreatment| pretreatment devices or features]] and [[Wells| monitoring wells]] to track drainage performance of the facility over its operating lifespan. <br> | Infiltration trenches are an ideal technology for installing below any type of landscape with requirements to infiltrate excess stormwater while safely conveying excess flows during major storm events. Components include: reservoir [[aggregates| aggregate]] to store runoff water, perforated pipe to deliver and distribute flow to the trench, [[geotextile]], [[Inlets|inlet structures]], [[Pretreatment| pretreatment devices or features]] and [[Wells| monitoring wells]] to track drainage performance of the facility over its operating lifespan. <br> | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 22 December 2022
Overview[edit]
Infiltration trenches typically consist of linear, rectangular- or trapezoidal-shaped trench excavations between 0.6 and 2.4 m wide that are lined with geotextile, backfilled with clear stone aggregate and located underground. They are well suited to sites where available space for infiltration is limited to strips of land between buildings or properties, or along road right-of-ways. Trench depth is determined by the infiltration rate of the underlying native soil and maximum acceptable time to fully drain the facility (i.e., drainage time). STEP has prepared life cycle costs estimates for infiltration trenches located on highly permeable, 20 mm/h infiltration rate native soil (Full Infiltration design), and on moderately permeable, 10 mm/h infiltration rate native soil (Partial Infiltration design) scenarios for comparison. Cost estimates for both design scenarios are based on a 2,000 m2 asphalt drainage area, runoff control target of 25 mm depth and 72 hour drainage period, which can be viewed below. To generate your own life cycle cost estimates customized to the development context, design criteria, and constraints applicable to your site, access the updated LID Life Cycle Costing Tool (LCCT) here.
Design Assumptions[edit]
Infiltration trenches are an ideal technology for installing below any type of landscape with requirements to infiltrate excess stormwater while safely conveying excess flows during major storm events. Components include: reservoir aggregate to store runoff water, perforated pipe to deliver and distribute flow to the trench, geotextile, inlet structures, pretreatment devices or features and monitoring wells to track drainage performance of the facility over its operating lifespan.
Design and operation and maintenance program assumptions used to generate cost estimates are based on tool default values and the following STEP recommendations:
- Native soil infiltration rates for Full, and Partial Infiltration Design scenarios were assumed to be 20 mm/h and 10 mm/h respectively, and a safety factor of 2.5 was applied to calculate the design infiltration rate.
- Operation and maintenance (O&M) cost estimates assume annual inspections, removal of trash and debris twice a year, removal of sediment from pretreatment structures annually. Verification inspections are included every 5 years to confirm adequate maintenance, and every 15 years to confirm adequate drainage performance through in-situ trench water level monitoring during natural storm events.
- Designed with an impervious drainage area to treatment facility area ratio of between 5:1 and a maximum of 20:1.
- Length to width ratio of infiltration trench area recommended from facilities receiving road or parking lot runoff is 10:1.
- Should be set back at least four (4) metres from building foundations.
- Overflow pipes should discharge to pervious areas located at least 2m from building foundations and slope away from building or to a storm sewer.
- Default filter media depth of 1.0 metres to accommodate trees in planting plan.
- Trench bottom width is generally between 0.60 and 2.4 metres.
- Default maximum depth of 3 - 4 metres, as there are cost implications with using trench boxes to retain the side walls.
- An underdrain (300 mm diameter perforated pipe) is included in Partial Infiltration & Full Infiltration design configurations.
Notes[edit]
- Designs include pretreatment through hydrodynamic separator (Oil and Grit Separator).
- The tool calculates costs for new (greenfield) development contexts and includes costs for contractor overhead and profit, material, delivery, labour, equipment (rental, operating and operator costs), hauling and disposal.
- Land value and equipment mobilization and demobilization costs are not included, assuming BMP construction is part of overall development site construction.
- Design and Engineering cost estimates are not calculated by the tool and must be supplied by the user.
- The tool adds 10% contingency and additional overhead as default.
- All cost estimates are in Canadian dollars and represent the net present value (NPV) as the tool takes into account average annual interest and discount rates over the 25 and 50 year operating life cycle periods.
- Unit costs are based on 2018 RSMeans standard union pricing.
- Additional costs associated with retrofit or redevelopment contexts is assumed to be 16% of the cost estimate for new (greenfield) construction contexts.
- Retrofit construction cost estimates are included in the 'Costs Summary' section for comparison.
- Retrofit construction cost estimates are included in the 'Costs Summary' section for comparison.
Construction Costs[edit]
Note: Please click on each image to enlarge to view associated construction cost estimates.
Above you can find a cost breakdown of a 1000m2 in two different configurations:
As can be seen, regardless of design configuration, Material & Installation expenses represent the largest portion of total construction costs (75 to 76%).
Life Cycle Costs[edit]
Below are capital and life cycle cost estimates for the two infiltration trench configurations over 25- and 50-year time periods. The estimates of maintenance and rehabilitation (life cycle) costs represent net present values. Operation and maintenance costs are predicted to represent 38% of total life cycle costs over the 25-year evaluation period, and increase to 51% of total life cycle costs over the 50-year period, due to increased levels of litter removal, replacement of filter cloth and disposal of collected sediment (every 4 - 8 years), cleaning out the catchbasin and the Oil and Grit Separator/Hydrodynamic Separator annually, as well as flushing the internal pipes every 10 years.
25-Year life cycle cost break down[edit]
Note: Click on each image to enlarge to view associated life cycle cost estimate.
50-Year life cycle cost break down[edit]
Note: Click on each image to enlarge to view associated life cycle cost estimate.
Cost Summary Tables[edit]
Total life cycle cost estimates for the two infiltration trench configurations vary substantially with the Infiltration Trench: Partial Infiltration design being highest ($85,288.88), followed closely by the Infiltration Trench: Full Infiltration design being ($69,805.90).
It is notable that a sensitivity analysis was conducted in 2019 to compare construction cost estimates generated by the tool to actual costs of implemented projects. The analysis found that tool estimates were typically within ±14% of actual construction costs[2]
Full Infiltration[edit]
Partial Infiltration[edit]
References[edit]
- ↑ Hydrologic Assessment of LID Honda Campus, Markham, ON - TECHNICAL BRIEF. Accessed Dec 19 2022. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2015/07/Honda_TechBrief_July2015.pdf
- ↑ Credit Vally Conservation (CVC). 2019. Life-cycle costing tool 2019 update: sensitivity analysis. Credit Valley Conservation, Mississauga, Ontario. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2020/04/LCCT-Sensitivity-Analysis_March2020.pdf
- ↑ Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices - TECHNICAL BRIEF. Low Impact Development Series. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2016/08/BioVSTrench_TechBrief__July2015.pdf