Difference between revisions of "Bioretention: Partial infiltration"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) |
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="col-md-8"> | <div class="col-md-8"> | ||
{{TOClimit|2}} | {{TOClimit|2}} | ||
| − | + | [[File:Partial infiltration.png|thumb|Partially infiltrating bioretention with underdrain.]] | |
| − | + | [[File: Partial with storage.png|thumb|Partially infiltrating bioretention with anaerobic/aerobic storage zone.]] | |
| − | + | ==Overview== | |
| − | + | Over soils with slow infiltration rates, it is advantageous to drain a portion of the stored water prior to any upcoming storm. This popular design choice can optimize annual water balance, mitigate peak flow rates and by ensuring water flow through, can reduce the accumulation of sodium and chlorine ions from winter salting. | |
| + | ==Performance== | ||
{{:Bioretention: Water quality}} | {{:Bioretention: Water quality}} | ||
| − | + | ==Materials=== | |
| − | + | *[[Underdrain]] | |
| − | + | *[[Biomedia]] | |
| − | + | *[[Erosion control blankets|Erosion control]]</li> | |
| − | + | *[[Mulch|Mulch]] | |
| − | + | *[[Bioretention: Planting plans|Planting considerations]] and [[Bioretention: Plant list| Recommended species]] | |
| − | + | ==Research== | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{:Bioretention:_Partial_infiltration_volume}} | {{:Bioretention:_Partial_infiltration_volume}} | ||
| − | + | ||
[[Bioretention cells|<i class="fa fa-level-up" aria-hidden="true"></i><strong>Back to bioretention</strong>]] | [[Bioretention cells|<i class="fa fa-level-up" aria-hidden="true"></i><strong>Back to bioretention</strong>]] | ||
| − | + | ||
[[category:Infiltration]] | [[category:Infiltration]] | ||
| + | [[category:Green infrastructure]] | ||
Revision as of 01:11, 8 September 2017
Overview[edit]
Over soils with slow infiltration rates, it is advantageous to drain a portion of the stored water prior to any upcoming storm. This popular design choice can optimize annual water balance, mitigate peak flow rates and by ensuring water flow through, can reduce the accumulation of sodium and chlorine ions from winter salting.