| Chemical Soil Stabilization
|
Substances that bind soil particles to stabilize the soil surface.
|
- Subject to CA approval within regulated area
- In conjunction with seeding in areas not accessed by vehicles
- Only applied on bare soil if: reapplied at recommended frequency, no concentrated flows, no vehicle traffic, short term use only
|
[https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2013/02/Polymer-Guide-Final_NewFormat.pdf Anionic Polyacrylamide Application Guide
for Urban Construction in Ontario (TRCA, 2013)]
|
}
Sediment controls[edit]
Table 2. Sediment Controls
| Practice (click for detailed design requirements – opens appendix PDF)
|
Description
|
Applicability
|
Design Drawings and Other Resources
|
Example Image (click to expand)
|
| Sediment Control Fence
|
Geotextile material supported by posts and trenched into the ground to support settling of sheet flows.
|
- Site perimeter
- up-gradient side of sensitive areas/streams
- Around material stockpiles
- 1.5 m away from slope base
- Do not install perpendicular to concentrated flows
- Parallel to areas with sediment laden sheet flow
|
|
|
| Filter Socks
|
Tubular mesh socks filled with wood chip or compost that dissipate flow velocities and pond water to promote sediment settling.
|
- applied along contours on level and sloped areas, perpendicular to sheet flows
- 1.5 m from slope base
- site perimeter
- as check dams in swales and ditches
- around storm drain inlets and sediment bags
- base of topsoil stockpiles
- in place of sediment fence when frozen
|
|
|
| Natural Fibre Logs
|
Similar to filter socks but made of biodegradable materials such as coir, straw, or wood.
|
- applied along contours on level and sloped areas, perpendicular to sheet flows
- 1.5 m from slope base
- site perimeter
- as check dams in swales and ditches
- Around storm drain inlets and sediment bags
- base of topsoil stockpiles
- in place of sediment fence when frozen
|
|
|
| Rock Check Dams
|
Weir constructed across channels from granular material and geotextile to reduce flow velocity.
|
- Perpendicular to concentrated flow channels, especially in long/steep channels
- Do not use in natural features
|
|
|
| Vehicle Tracking Controls
|
Measures such as mud mats, shaker racks, or wheel washers to prevent vehicles from tracking mud offsite.
|
Vehicle tracking controls:
- site >1 ha
- grading/filling close to entrances
- Weather/site conditions cause mud
Wheel washing:
- Mud tracking ongoing issue and vehicle tracking controls not providing mitigation/cannot be constructed due to site constraints
- contaminated soils
- required by municipality
|
|
|
| Sediment Dewatering Bags
|
Large geotextile bags used to filter sediment-laden water from pumped discharge.
|
- anywhere dewatering necessary to create a dry work area, particularly where space limited
- where flow dispersion is needed to prevent erosion
- best used in treatment train
|
|
|
| Storm Drain Inlet Protection
|
Blocks sediment entry to inlets while allowing water through.
|
- all operational inlets at grade around or overtop the inlet
- below grade inside a storm drain
- treatment train required for drainage areas >1 ha
|
|
|
| Sediment Traps
|
Runoff detention area created by an embankment or depression to allow sediment settling.
|
- end of a treatment train before discharged offsite
- across drainage/conveyance features
- drainage areas ≤ 2 ha that do not drain to another detention feature
|
|
|
| Sediment Ponds
|
Similar to sediment traps but larger. Excavated depression for permanent water retention
|
- Treatment of runoff from drainage areas > 2 ha
- end-of-pipe control
|
|
|
| Weir Tanks
|
Tanks that detain stormwater runoff to promote sediment settling.
|
- Sediment removal for short-term pumping / dewatering activities
- when more stringent effluent water quality standards required
- Planned pumping rates are high and require large capacity
|
|
|
| Polymer Flocculants
|
Chemical agents that bind suspended particles to enhance sediment removal.
|
- Treatment for short-term pumping activities
- A high sediment removal rate is required but area too small for wet pond
- Water contains contaminants or a large proportion of fine sediments
- more stringent effluent water quality standards required
- Other conventional BMPs cannot achieve removal rates
|
|
|
| Active Treatment Systems
|
Systems combining tanks, flocculants, and filters for precise and high-efficiency contaminant removal.
|
- Treatment for short-term pumping activities
- A high sediment removal rate is required but area too small for wet pond
- Water contains contaminants
- more stringent effluent water quality standards required
- Other conventional BMPs cannot achieve removal rates
|
|
|
Protecting LID features during construction[edit]
LID practices that promote infiltration as their primary function for water quality & management of overland flows - such as bioretention areas, permeable pavements, and infiltration trenches (link pages) - are vulnerable to damage during construction activities that can compromise their ability to function as intended.
These features can become clogged with sediment, experience erosion at inlets and in planted areas, suffer compaction from heavy machinery, or be contaminated by pollutants in construction runoff. To minimize these risks and maintain effective protection throughout all phases of construction, the following best practices should be implemented:
- Keep LID perimeter controls in working order throughout construction
- Protect LID inlets
- Avoid heavy equipment on infiltration areas (i.e., driving vehicles through filter beds, or over granular water storage and bedding layers
- Phase construction so that LID measures are constructed last. Underground LID features can be built early in the construction process, provided they are protected by a barrier such as a plug.
- Keep LID installations offline via flow diversion until construction is complete, the drainage area is stabilized, and vehicle mud tracking is stopped.
- Avoid using LID areas as temporary detention basins, but in cases where flow cannot be routed around LID areas, protection should be used to prevent accumulated sediment from migrating into the subgrade.
- Be mindful of stockpile locations relative to LID areas
- Inspect LID areas during ESC site inspections
- Identify and mark LID areas to increase awareness
Spill Response[edit]
Creating a spill response, control, and reporting plan is a key part of erosion and sediment control (ESC) for construction projects. Although spills are not common, their environmental impact can be significant. A well-developed plan allows for quick, effective action that reduces environmental harm and cleanup needs. It also shows due diligence in protecting natural features.
At a minimum, the plan should include:
- Emergency contact numbers;
- A list of on-site spill control materials; and
- Clear steps for responding to different types of spills.
Prevention is equally important and involves:
- Identifying potential pollutants;
- Assessing risks; and,
- Safely storing materials away from storm drains and water bodies.
When spills occur, immediate action is required. Minor spills must be contained, cleaned up, and documented. Significant spills, such as those that may affect nearby or downstream water features, must be reported right away to the contract administrator, Ontario Spills Action Centre, and other relevant contacts. Response efforts should begin immediately, including monitoring and recording spill details and cleanup steps. Strong planning, prevention, and response protocols help minimize environmental damage during construction.
An example spill response/reporting plan by the City of Mississauga for small, medium, and large spills is available for download (downward facing arrow on the top righthand side) and printing (Printer emoticon on top right hand side) on the right.
Plan Submission and Approval[edit]
The submission requirements for erosion and sediment control strategies are organized based on three planning stages: early, intermediate, and late, which align with both the land-use and infrastructure planning processes. Each stage builds on the previous one, helping to gradually refine ESC strategies as more project details become available.
- In the early stage, the focus is on high-level planning, identifying potential impacts, and committing to appropriate ESC approaches.
- During the intermediate stage, ESC planning becomes more site-specific, using detailed information about layout, grading, and servicing.
- In the late stage, a comprehensive ESC report and drawings are submitted.
This progressive approach ensures that ESC strategies evolve alongside the project’s design and that regulatory requirements are addressed at each stage. The permits and approvals required for an urban construction project are dictated by relevant legislation as well as project and site-specific circumstances. Early consultation with regulatory agencies is encouraged in order to allow time for any necessary permits and approvals to be issued. Refer to Chapters 8 and 9 in the 2019 guide for full details on requirements for each planning stage and the approvals process.
For projects requiring a TRCA permit, information on the TRCA permitting process can be found here.
ESC report contents and drawings checklists, created by TRCA in 2019, are available for download here.
Routine inspection[edit]
ESC inspection programs regularly assess the effectiveness of BMPs, identify maintenance and repair needs, and identify areas where BMPs should be replaced or augmented. Consult the appendices linked in the first column of table 1, 2, and 3 (above) for BMP-specific inspection points. Inspections should be conducted:
- Before there is any activity to see the natural landscape, drainage, and sensitive features
- During the initial installation of ESC measures
- On a weekly basis during active construction
- Before and after significant rainfall and snowmelt events
- After any extreme weather which could result in damage to ESC measures
- Daily during extended rain or snowmelt periods
- Monthly during inactive periods (> 30 days)
- During or immediately following any spill event
- Before construction is shut down for the winter to ensure the site is ready for freezing conditions and thaws
- At the end of construction to confirm that the site has achieved at least 80% stabilization (CSA, 2018) and that permanent vegetation areas are well-established and effectively preventing erosion
Where applicable, inspections of ESC measures should be integrated with inspections of LID features. Construction and assumption inspections (https://wiki.sustainabletechnologies.ca/wiki/Inspections_and_maintenance#Inspection_.26_Maintenance_Terminology) for LID features are often required on the same schedule as ESC measures - for example, weekly, after major storm events, or at key construction milestones.
Include copy of this section:
https://wiki.sustainabletechnologies.ca/wiki/Pre-construction#Erosion_and_sediment_control_inspection_and_maintenance
Performance Monitoring[edit]
An in-water turbidity monitoring station.
It is important to evaluate the cumulative effectiveness of all the controls installed on a construction site. Turbidity (a proxy for TSS) of the site discharges or the receiving water system is typically measured to assess ESC effectiveness. Turbidity targets vary based on duration of exposure, as the extent of potential harm to receiving aquatic ecosystems is dictated by both concentration and duration:
Table 3: Maximum allowable construction-based turbidity increases in the receiving water system at different durations
| Construction-based turbidity increase (NTU)
|
Duration (h)
|
| ≤ 25
|
Any duration
|
| 761
|
0.5
|
| 324
|
1
|
| 138
|
2
|
| 84
|
3
|
| 59
|
4
|
| 45
|
5
|
| 36
|
6
|
| 29
|
7
|
The extent of turbidity monitoring and methods used on a given construction project should be based on erosion risk, receiving water flows, presence of species at risk, and type and location of discharge points. The monitoring program for sites applying the receiving water target should include the following components:
- One continuous online turbidity monitoring station 5 to 15 m downstream of the last site discharge point.
- At least one continuous online turbidity monitoring station immediately upstream of the site.
Map showing an example construction site with two pond discharges and an upstream and downstream monitoring site.
Each turbidity monitoring station should be equipped with a turbidity sonde, data logger, power supply, protective enclosure, and, where Species at Risk (SAR) are present, telemetry capabilities. Continuous turbidity monitoring should be maintained until the site has reached at least 80% effective permanent stabilization. Where continuous monitoring is not feasible, grab samples should be collected. To support interpretation of turbidity exceedances, precipitation data should be obtained from a rain gauge located within 5 km of the site. Clear protocols for responding to and reporting turbidity exceedances should be established for all sites with continuous monitoring.
Maintenance of ESC[edit]
Timely maintenance of ESC practices is essential for demonstrating due diligence on construction sites. Repairs or replacements should be completed promptly - within 48 h, or sooner if there is imminent environmental risk. Where feasible, backup materials should be stored on-site to expedite maintenance. Maintenance tasks vary depending on the ESC practice and a list of maintenance tasks can be found for each BMP by clicking on the first column of table 1, 2, and 3 (above). General ESC maintenance tasks are listed in Table 4.
Table 4. ESC Maintenance and Repair Activities
| Category
|
Key Actions and Considerations
|
| Surface Repair
|
- Regrade and fill eroded areas
- Upgrade stabilization where existing measures are inadequate
- Ensure discharge points are not causing erosion and apply stabilization if needed
- Restore disturbed or compacted areas caused by vehicle or equipment access
|
| Sediment Removal
|
- Remove and dispose of accumulated sediment before capacity is exceeded or when clogged
- Rake or replace overloaded granular materials
|
| Structural Repair
|
- Repair or replace damaged components such as filter socks and silt fences
- Reposition or resecure devices that have shifted
- Reinforce access restrictions to protected or stabilized areas
|
| Vegetation Restoration
|
- Re-seed areas where vegetation has failed
- Repair or replace damaged tree protection fencing or buffer zones
|
| Flow Control Adjustments
|
- Modify or reinforce swales, slope drains, and energy dissipators where flows are causing erosion or bypass
- Add or upgrade flow interruption devices if current setups are overwhelmed
- Regrade swales or adjust flow paths to reduce velocity and erosion risk
|
| Corrective Actions
|
- Implement fixes for recurring failures
- Replace underperforming ESC measures with more effective alternatives where necessary
- Prioritize and complete urgent repairs
|
Decommissioning of ESC[edit]
Decommissioning practices vary depending on the ESC and specific considerations can be found for each BMP by clicking on the first column of table 1, 2, and 3 (above). General ESC decommissioning considerations are listed in Table 5.
Table 5. ESC Decommissioning
| Category
|
Key Actions and Considerations
|
| Timing & Prerequisites
|
- Follow construction drawing sequencing, typically working upstream to downstream
- Only decommission ESC measures once areas receiving runoff are fully stabilized (i.e., vegetation well-established, slopes stabilized)
- Ensure runoff has been re-routed appropriately before removing conveyance features
|
| Sediment and Material Removal
|
- Remove accumulated sediment from ESC and dispose of in accordance with sediment quality and applicable legislation
- Treat water from dewatering activities using suitable sediment removal BMPs (e.g., sediment bags, weir tanks)
- Ensure flocculants and chemically treated sediment are disposed of properly
- Prevent thermal impacts by releasing water gradually to vegetated areas instead of directly into watercourses
|
| ESC Feature Removal
|
- Remove temporary ESC structures with minimal disturbance to stabilized areas and natural features
- Reusable materials (e.g., stakes, fence fabric) may be salvaged; others should be disposed of at appropriate facilities
- Biodegradable materials may be left in place if allowed and seeded appropriately for long-term restoration
- Some ESC practices may be retained or transitioned to permanent controls to manage long-term erosion and prevent sediment transport
|
| Site Stabilization & Restoration
|
- All disturbed areas must be graded and stabilized per final design
- Use native, weed-free vegetation for site restoration
- Stabilize areas before flow is returned to newly constructed or natural channels
|
| Regulatory Compliance
|
- Ensure removal follows manufacturer recommendations
- Coordinate with regulatory authorities where required
- Ensure stranded wildlife are safely relocated in accordance with permits
|
|