Difference between revisions of "Rainwater harvesting: Water quality"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*<strong>Micro- or Ultra- filtration</strong> uses such fine membranes that the vast majority of harmful viruses, bacteria etc. are excluded from the water directly. | *<strong>Micro- or Ultra- filtration</strong> uses such fine membranes that the vast majority of harmful viruses, bacteria etc. are excluded from the water directly. | ||
All three water purification technologies require specialist design and consultation with a subject matter expert is recommended for higher tiers of water use. | All three water purification technologies require specialist design and consultation with a subject matter expert is recommended for higher tiers of water use. | ||
| − | |||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
|+ Water quality treatment required for multi-residential and commercial applications (Abridged from [https://www.iccsafe.org/wp-content/uploads/110116-Draft-CSA_ICC-B805-Rainwater-Harvesting.pdf CSA B805 draft]) | |+ Water quality treatment required for multi-residential and commercial applications (Abridged from [https://www.iccsafe.org/wp-content/uploads/110116-Draft-CSA_ICC-B805-Rainwater-Harvesting.pdf CSA B805 draft]) | ||
| Line 30: | Line 29: | ||
*Rooftop cooling}} | *Rooftop cooling}} | ||
|0||99%||99%||99.99%||99.99%||99.9% | |0||99%||99%||99.99%||99.99%||99.9% | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |HVAC systems | ||
| + | |colspan=6 style="text-align: center;"|In accordance with [https://www.ashrae.org/resources--publications/bookstore/ansi-ashrae-standard-188-2015-legionellosis-risk-management-for-building-water-systems ASHRAE 188] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !3 | ||
| + | |{{plainlist| | ||
| + | *Hose bibbs | ||
| + | *Pressure washing | ||
| + | *Vehicle washing | ||
| + | *Spray irrigation (non-restricted) | ||
| + | *Decorative fountains}} | ||
| + | |99.9%||99.9%||99.9%||99.99%||99.99%||99.99% | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | !4 | ||
| + | |{{plainlist| | ||
| + | *Human consumption | ||
| + | *Oral care | ||
| + | *Food preparation | ||
| + | *Dish-washing | ||
| + | *Bathing, showering, and hand washing | ||
| + | *Pool/hot tubs/spas/splash pads | ||
| + | *Misting stations | ||
| + | *Swamp coolers}} | ||
| + | |0||99.999%||99.999%||colspan = "3" style="text-align: center;"|Outside of the scope of the CSA standard | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | + | ===Source Water Quality=== | |
| − | + | A study of many types of roof surfaces in Texas found: | |
| − | + | *'Cool' membrane, concrete tile, and metal roofs all produced water of similar good quality for non-potable use, | |
| − | + | *The runoff water from asphalt shingle and green roofs contained significantly more dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The DOC can add a yellow colour to the water. If the water is treated with chlorine, for drinking purposes, DOC can produce toxic compounds<ref>Mendez CB, Klenzendorf JB, Afshar BR, et al. The effect of roofing material on the quality of harvested rainwater. Water Res. 2011;45(5):2049-2059. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.015.</ref>. | |
| − | + | Research in Hamilton, ON assessed the water quality of rain collected from three highly reflective 'cool roof' membranes<ref>Cupido, A., B. Baetz, Y. Guo, and A. Robertson. 2012. An evaluation of rainwater runoff quality from selected white roof membranes. doi: 10.2166/wqrjc.2012.011.</ref>. Key findings: | |
| − | + | *The water was free from significant contamination with by-products of plastic manufacture and did not show elevated levels of the five metals tested. | |
| − | + | *Increased microbiological contamination was found in runoff from roof areas where ponding occurred. | |
| − | + | Note: Increased microbiological contamination in roof runoff is also associated with warmer weather <ref>Vialle C, Sablayrolles C, Lovera M, Jacob S, Huau MC, Montrejaud-Vignoles M. Monitoring of water quality from roof runoff: Interpretation using multivariate analysis. Water Res. 2011;45(12):3765-3775. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.029.</ref>. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ==References== | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 14:07, 19 July 2023
The important water quality parameters for harvested rainwater differ from other types of LID. This is due to the potential for direct human contact, rather than environmental discharge. As of July 2017, the CSA and ICC are finalizing a standard[1] which specifies different water quality treatments according to the source (roof runoff versus stormwater runoff) and the intended use.
Tier 1 end uses are most readily achievable, requiring only that larger particles are filtered out of the water. Removing the bulk of the solid particles reduces the nutrient concentration in the water and prevents clogging of the water distribution system. Toilet and urinal flushing are the next most popular use of harvested rainwater. If flushing or other higher tier end uses are desired, disinfection of some type is required and consideration may be given to colour and odour of the water. Technologies for achieving higher standards of water quality include:
- Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection requires additional filtration to remove particles so that the light can penetrate the water and destroy the viruses and bacteria,
- Chlorine disinfection also requires additional filtration to remove larger particles,
- Micro- or Ultra- filtration uses such fine membranes that the vast majority of harmful viruses, bacteria etc. are excluded from the water directly.
All three water purification technologies require specialist design and consultation with a subject matter expert is recommended for higher tiers of water use.
| Application | Roof runoff pathogen reduction | Stormwater pathogen reduction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| End Use Tier | Example uses | Viruses | Bacteria | Protazoa | Viruses | Bacteria | Protazoa |
| 1 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 |
|
0 | 99% | 99% | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.9% |
| HVAC systems | In accordance with ASHRAE 188 | ||||||
| 3 |
|
99.9% | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.99% | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| 4 |
|
0 | 99.999% | 99.999% | Outside of the scope of the CSA standard | ||
Source Water Quality[edit]
A study of many types of roof surfaces in Texas found:
- 'Cool' membrane, concrete tile, and metal roofs all produced water of similar good quality for non-potable use,
- The runoff water from asphalt shingle and green roofs contained significantly more dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The DOC can add a yellow colour to the water. If the water is treated with chlorine, for drinking purposes, DOC can produce toxic compounds[1].
Research in Hamilton, ON assessed the water quality of rain collected from three highly reflective 'cool roof' membranes[2]. Key findings:
- The water was free from significant contamination with by-products of plastic manufacture and did not show elevated levels of the five metals tested.
- Increased microbiological contamination was found in runoff from roof areas where ponding occurred.
Note: Increased microbiological contamination in roof runoff is also associated with warmer weather [3].
References[edit]
- ↑ Mendez CB, Klenzendorf JB, Afshar BR, et al. The effect of roofing material on the quality of harvested rainwater. Water Res. 2011;45(5):2049-2059. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.12.015.
- ↑ Cupido, A., B. Baetz, Y. Guo, and A. Robertson. 2012. An evaluation of rainwater runoff quality from selected white roof membranes. doi: 10.2166/wqrjc.2012.011.
- ↑ Vialle C, Sablayrolles C, Lovera M, Jacob S, Huau MC, Montrejaud-Vignoles M. Monitoring of water quality from roof runoff: Interpretation using multivariate analysis. Water Res. 2011;45(12):3765-3775. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.029.