8,255
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 26:
Line 26: + + + + + Line 46:
Line 51: − + + + + Line 53:
Line 61: − |- − |Maintenance||Medium to high||Low − |- − |Stormwater benefit||High||Moderate − |- − |Biodiversity benefit||Increased with native planting||Typically lower
no edit summary
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros'''
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros'''
*Robust
*Provides excellent water quality treatment
*Resistant to temporary hydraulic overload
*Can be beautiful
*Sludge removal infrequent
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros'''
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros'''
*Well established technology
*Well established technology
*Will function prior to establishment of vegetation
*Will function prior to establishment of vegetation
|-
|-
|
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons'''
*Requires larger land area
*Sludge removal may be more difficult
*Open water may generate more health and safety concerns.
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons'''
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons'''
*Requires more land
*Requires more land
*May be high cost
*May be high cost
*Sensitive to hydraulic overloading
*Sensitive to hydraulic overloading
|}
|}