Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''<h3>[[LID opportunities in parks]]</h3>'''  [[File:Example.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The bioretention area installed at O’Connor Park
+
#REDIRECT [[LID opportunities on public land]]
in Mississauga is part of a stormwater management system
  −
that treats parking lot runoff prior to discharging to a local
  −
wetland. (Source: CVC)]]
  −
 
  −
Parks range from simple parcels of municipal property to
  −
complex outdoor recreational facilities that include parking,
  −
sidewalks, trails, sports fields, field houses, operations
  −
facilities, and washrooms. Each distinct area of your site can
  −
be a source for runoff (referred to as a ‘source area’). These
  −
areas should be targeted when introducing LID in your park.
  −
<br><br>
  −
'''<h4>Targeting hard surfaces</h4>'''
  −
Hard surfaces like parking lots and internal driveways are the
  −
most obvious areas to target for both stormwater quality and
  −
water balance improvements. These features produce more
  −
runoff than any other area on your site. Water quality of runoff
  −
from parking lots and driveways is typically more polluted
  −
than other source areas. Common water quality concerns
  −
include sand and salt from winter de-icing operations, and
  −
hydrocarbons (gasoline) and metals from vehicle breakdowns
  −
Runoff from vegetated areas of parks will be relatively
  −
clean and more closely match the natural water balance.
  −
On municipal park properties, hard surfaces are usually
  −
located adjacent to pervious areas such as lawns, gardens or naturalized areas. This makes an ideal location for a LID
  −
retrofit. Where grading allows, you can construct bioswales
  −
and bioretention areas in these green areas to pre-treat water
  −
prior to infiltration.
  −
You can also design parking surfaces and internal roadways
  −
as infiltration systems using permeable pavement. This retrofit
  −
strategy can be combined with other LID practices.
  −
A pedestrian pathway paved with permeable pavement
  −
is another LID option for your park. They will reduce runoff
  −
volumes and encourage on-site infiltration. Pervious pipes
  −
are a viable option on many parks sites as well. They can be
  −
an alternative to conventional conveyance systems such as
  −
storm sewers. They encourage infiltration from hard surfaces
  −
and can be used to convey water to other LID features.
  −
<br> <br>
  −
'''<h4>Accepting drainage from off-site areas</h4>'''  [[File:Example1.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|Urban parkettes may look small, but they have
  −
the potential to treat a large surface area of road. Typical ratios
  −
of impervious drainage area to bioretention range from 5:1 to
  −
15:1. (Source: CVC)]]
  −
 
  −
Does municipally owned land drain into your retrofit site? If
  −
so, this is an opportunity to provide stormwater controls for
  −
these areas.
  −
Roads are the most common source of runoff from external
  −
properties into parks. Treating municipal road runoff in a park
  −
requires planning input from municipal roads department
  −
staff. For these projects, the team must understand how all
  −
roads activities, including winter maintenance and potential
  −
roadwork, will affect the operation of LID practices in the park.
  −
<br><br>
  −
'''<h4>Inter-municipal transfer of funds</h4>''' Integrating LID practices into the municipal stormwater
  −
management framework may change how municipal funds are
  −
managed. Traditional stormwater management maintenance
  −
resources and funds may have to be transferred to a more landscape-based stormwater management maintenance program. Instead of infrequent but expensive stormwater management pond sediment removal operations, time and
  −
resources will be spent on more frequent but inexpensive maintenance projects including pruning and weeding bioretention practices or sweeping permeable pavement.
  −
Municipalities generally have the required staff and infrastructure within departments (e.g. arborist and horticulturalists in parks departments) to manage the maintenance of LID measures; however, funding this maintenance may require a transfer of funding and additional
  −
training.
  −
The federal Gas Tax Fund (GTF) is another funding option for
  −
funding LID retrofits. This is a federal transfer that provides
  −
long term funding for municipalities to build and revitalize
  −
public infrastructure. Up to 30% of municipalities yearly GTF
  −
allotment can be used towards stormwater management.
  −
<br><br>
  −
 
  −
'''<h4>Source Areas</h4>'''  [[File:Example3.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The road surface (left) contributes significantly
  −
more stormwater pollutants than the parkland area (right). To
  −
achieve maximum watershed benefit a designer could consider
  −
accepting runoff from this external area. (Source: CVC)]]
  −
The LID option that best fits your site will depend what types
  −
of source areas are present. Types of source areas include:
  −
• Active use area
  −
• Passive use area
  −
• Pedestrian walkway
  −
• Internal driveway
  −
• Parking lot
  −
On park sites, pollution prevention is often associated with
  −
changes to operations and maintenance practices and has
  −
not been included in Table 3.3.1. An aerial photo of a park
  −
with each of these source areas accompanies Table 3.3.1.
  −
Options and implementation strategies for a few of these
  −
source areas will give you some ideas for your park site.
  −
{| class="wikitable"
  −
|colspan="9" style="text-align: center;|'''[[LID Options for Parks]]'''
  −
|-
  −
|style="background:cyan; color:black"| Source area ||style="background:cyan; color:black"|  Permeable pavement || style="background:cyan; color:black"| Bioretention || style="background:cyan; color:black"| Enhanced grassed swales || style="background:cyan; color:black"| Bioswales ||style="background:cyan; color:black"|  Soakaways and infiltration chambers ||style="background:cyan; color:black"|  Perforated pipe system || style="background:cyan; color:black"| Landscape alternatives ||style="background:cyan; color:black"|  Prefabricated modules
  −
|-
  −
| Active use area ||style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|* ||style="text-align: center;| o ||style="text-align: center;| o
  −
|-
  −
| Passive use area ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| **
  −
|-style="text-align: center;|
  −
| Pedestrian walkway || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| * || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|o
  −
|-
  −
| Internal driveway || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|o ||style="text-align: center;| *
  −
|-
  −
| Parking lot ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|**
  −
 
  −
|-
  −
!colspan="3" style="background:yellow; color:black"| '''** Common option'''
  −
!colspan="3" style="background: orange; color: black"|'''* Possible option'''
  −
!colspan="3" style="background: brown; color: white"|'''o Unlikely'''
  −
|}
  −
'''<h3>[[Making it happen: Approaches to getting LID into parks]] </h3>'''
  −
 
  −
The scale of your LID project will largely determine how you
  −
will proceed. This guide provides two tiers of LID park retrofit
  −
projects. You can usually complete small-scale LID projects
  −
with in-house expertise and resources. Large-scale projects
  −
will require external support from consultants and contractors.
  −
 
  −
'''<h4>Small-scale projects</h4>''' [[File:Example4.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|A no-mow zone is a landscape alternative that
  −
does not require construction activities. (Source: Aquafor Beech)]]
  −
Starting with small-scale projects is a good strategy to
  −
increase public interest in LID practices, gauge municipal
  −
support, and gain experience. Small-scale projects include
  −
retrofitting your parks site with landscape alternatives or rain
  −
barrels, or using pollution prevention strategies and practices.<br>
  −
Small-scale projects require fewer resources and require a
  −
smaller project budget because:
  −
* They do not require integration into capital works projects
  −
* Engineering consultants are not required
  −
* Contractors may not be not required
  −
* External approvals are not required
  −
* Consultation with the public is limited
  −
Due to the less significant financial commitment, it can be
  −
easier to build colleague and supervisor support for small-scale
  −
projects.<br>
  −
Small-scale projects like landscape alternatives and pollution
  −
prevention may not be easily identified as LID practices by
  −
the public. Your project team should consider establishing
  −
educational signage to inform the public.<br>
  −
'''<h4>Large-scale projects</h4>'''
  −
Large-scale projects require significantly more effort, budget,
  −
and staff than small-scale projects. Large-scale LID projects
  −
include:
  −
*Bioretention
  −
* Enhanced grass swales
  −
* Bioswales
  −
* Perforated pipe systems
  −
* Permeable pavement
  −
* Soakaways
  −
* Infiltration chambers
  −
* Rainwater harvesting (excluding rain barrels)
  −
* Prefabricated modules <br>
  −
Consider a large-scale project if your municipality or
  −
department would like to be a leader in sustainability. Largescale
  −
projects are often highly visible and attract more public
  −
attention. Large-scale projects may also be the only solution to
  −
site-specific challenges. For example, if the parking lot on your
  −
site does not have existing stormwater controls, small-scale
  −
projects are not likely to fully achieve compliance with water
  −
quality and quantity objectives. Consider using an infiltration
  −
chamber or bioswale project to meet those objectives.
  −
Before starting a large-scale retrofit project, consider the
  −
following distinctions that set these retrofits apart from smallscale
  −
projects.<br>
  −
'''<h4>Integration with capital works programs</h4>'''
  −
Most large-scale LID retrofits must function with existing
  −
site infrastructure, such as storm sewers, catch basins,
  −
and pavement systems. The construction of large-scale
  −
LID practices often requires these systems to be removed,
  −
exposed, or replaced. The best time for this type of project to
  −
occur is when an infrastructure replacement or rehabilitation
  −
project is already planned.
  −
For example, installing bioretention, infiltration chambers,
  −
or permeable pavement in a parking lot requires removal of
  −
existing pavement. Budget and resources set aside for parking lot replacement could be transferred to a retrofit project that
  −
includes replacement of this infrastructure.<br>
  −
'''<h4>Involvement of consultants and contractors</h4>'''
  −
Consultants are required for large-scale retrofit projects,
  −
specifically for the final screening of options, pre-design,
  −
detailed design, tender and contract documents, construction
  −
supervision and administration, and assumption and
  −
verification. Site contractors are also required for large-scale LID retrofits.
  −
Ideally, contractors should be pre-qualified based on previous
  −
experience with similar LID projects.
  −
<br>
  −
'''<h4>More intensive public consultation</h4>'''
  −
Stakeholders must be closely involved in the retrofit process
  −
for large-scale LID projects. These projects have longer
  −
construction windows, may have significant impacts on longterm
  −
public use patterns of the park, and will cost significantly
  −
more taxpayer dollars.
  −
Gaining public insight in advance of LID implementation can
  −
help address public concerns and information gaps, as well as
  −
identify public supporters and champions. Public consultation
  −
can help designers tailor the project to address community
  −
concerns and values. [[File:Example5.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|When installing new parks equipment, consider whether the LID practices can be integrated into the design. Here a
  −
bioswale has been built into the landscape between a playground and sidewalk. (Source: CVC)]]
  −
 
  −
'''<h4>External approvals</h4>'''
  −
Large-scale park retrofits may require a variety of approvals
  −
at the municipal, watershed, provincial, and/or federal level.
  −
Since LID is still relatively new, you may encounter policies
  −
or bylaws that present barriers to LID retrofit projects.
  −
Alternatively, the municipality may have to enforce some
  −
policies and bylaws to facilitate the implementation of LID
  −
projects within parks.
  −
<br>
  −
'''<h4>Next Steps</h4>'''
  −
After reading this chapter you should know how to select the
  −
right LID practice for your site. You should also be familiar
  −
with the details you need to consider before undertaking an
  −
LID retrofit.
 
8,255

edits

Navigation menu