Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''<h3>LID opportunities in parks</h3>'''  [[File:Example.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The bioretention area installed at O’Connor Park
+
#REDIRECT [[LID opportunities on public land]]
in Mississauga is part of a stormwater management system
  −
that treats parking lot runoff prior to discharging to a local
  −
wetland. (Source: CVC)]]
  −
 
  −
Parks range from simple parcels of municipal property to
  −
complex outdoor recreational facilities that include parking,
  −
sidewalks, trails, sports fields, field houses, operations
  −
facilities, and washrooms. Each distinct area of your site can
  −
be a source for runoff (referred to as a ‘source area’). These
  −
areas should be targeted when introducing LID in your park.
  −
<br><br>
  −
'''<h4>Targeting hard surfaces</h4>'''
  −
Hard surfaces like parking lots and internal driveways are the
  −
most obvious areas to target for both stormwater quality and
  −
water balance improvements. These features produce more
  −
runoff than any other area on your site. Water quality of runoff
  −
from parking lots and driveways is typically more polluted
  −
than other source areas. Common water quality concerns
  −
include sand and salt from winter de-icing operations, and
  −
hydrocarbons (gasoline) and metals from vehicle breakdowns
  −
Runoff from vegetated areas of parks will be relatively
  −
clean and more closely match the natural water balance.
  −
On municipal park properties, hard surfaces are usually
  −
located adjacent to pervious areas such as lawns, gardens or naturalized areas. This makes an ideal location for a LID
  −
retrofit. Where grading allows, you can construct bioswales
  −
and bioretention areas in these green areas to pre-treat water
  −
prior to infiltration.
  −
You can also design parking surfaces and internal roadways
  −
as infiltration systems using permeable pavement. This retrofit
  −
strategy can be combined with other LID practices.
  −
A pedestrian pathway paved with permeable pavement
  −
is another LID option for your park. They will reduce runoff
  −
volumes and encourage on-site infiltration. Pervious pipes
  −
are a viable option on many parks sites as well. They can be
  −
an alternative to conventional conveyance systems such as
  −
storm sewers. They encourage infiltration from hard surfaces
  −
and can be used to convey water to other LID features.
  −
<br> <br>
  −
'''<h4>Accepting drainage from off-site areas</h4>'''  [[File:Example1.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|Urban parkettes may look small, but they have
  −
the potential to treat a large surface area of road. Typical ratios
  −
of impervious drainage area to bioretention range from 5:1 to
  −
15:1. (Source: CVC)]]
  −
 
  −
Does municipally owned land drain into your retrofit site? If
  −
so, this is an opportunity to provide stormwater controls for
  −
these areas.
  −
Roads are the most common source of runoff from external
  −
properties into parks. Treating municipal road runoff in a park
  −
requires planning input from municipal roads department
  −
staff. For these projects, the team must understand how all
  −
roads activities, including winter maintenance and potential
  −
roadwork, will affect the operation of LID practices in the park.
  −
<br><br>
  −
'''<h3>Inter-municipal transfer of funds</h3>''' Integrating LID practices into the municipal stormwater
  −
management framework may change how municipal funds are
  −
managed. Traditional stormwater management maintenance
  −
resources and funds may have to be transferred to a more landscape-based stormwater management maintenance program. Instead of infrequent but expensive stormwater management pond sediment removal operations, time and
  −
resources will be spent on more frequent but inexpensive maintenance projects including pruning and weeding bioretention practices or sweeping permeable pavement.
  −
Municipalities generally have the required staff and infrastructure within departments (e.g. arborist and horticulturalists in parks departments) to manage the maintenance of LID measures; however, funding this maintenance may require a transfer of funding and additional
  −
training.
  −
The federal Gas Tax Fund (GTF) is another funding option for
  −
funding LID retrofits. This is a federal transfer that provides
  −
long term funding for municipalities to build and revitalize
  −
public infrastructure. Up to 30% of municipalities yearly GTF
  −
allotment can be used towards stormwater management.
  −
<br><br>
  −
 
  −
'''<h3>Source Areas</h3>'''  [[File:Example3.jpg|thumb|upright=0.6|The road surface (left) contributes significantly
  −
more stormwater pollutants than the parkland area (right). To
  −
achieve maximum watershed benefit a designer could consider
  −
accepting runoff from this external area. (Source: CVC)]]
  −
The LID option that best fits your site will depend what types
  −
of source areas are present. Types of source areas include:
  −
• Active use area
  −
• Passive use area
  −
• Pedestrian walkway
  −
• Internal driveway
  −
• Parking lot
  −
On park sites, pollution prevention is often associated with
  −
changes to operations and maintenance practices and has
  −
not been included in Table 3.3.1. An aerial photo of a park
  −
with each of these source areas accompanies Table 3.3.1.
  −
Options and implementation strategies for a few of these
  −
source areas will give you some ideas for your park site.
  −
{| class="wikitable"
  −
|colspan="9" style="text-align: center;|'''[[LID Options for Parks]]'''
  −
|-
  −
| Source area || Permeable pavement || Bioretention || Enhanced grassed swales || Bioswales || Soakaways and infiltration chambers || Perforated pipe system || Landscape alternatives || Prefabricated modules
  −
|-
  −
| Active use area ||style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|* ||style="text-align: center;| o ||style="text-align: center;| o
  −
|-
  −
| Passive use area ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| **
  −
|-style="text-align: center;|
  −
| Pedestrian walkway || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| * || style="text-align: center;|* || style="text-align: center;|o
  −
|-
  −
| Internal driveway || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|o ||style="text-align: center;| *
  −
|-
  −
| Parking lot ||style="text-align: center;| ** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** || style="text-align: center;|** ||style="text-align: center;| o || style="text-align: center;|**
  −
 
  −
|-
  −
!colspan="3" style="background:cyan; color:black"| '''** Common option'''
  −
!colspan="3" style="background: orange; color: black"|'''* Possible option'''
  −
!colspan="3" style="background: brown; color: white"|'''o Unlikely'''
  −
|}
 
8,255

edits

Navigation menu