Line 15: |
Line 15: |
| Dry ponds are a useful tool for managing flooding during larger storm events. They are well suited to being placed downstream of other smaller distributed BMPs for occasional backup flood protection. | | Dry ponds are a useful tool for managing flooding during larger storm events. They are well suited to being placed downstream of other smaller distributed BMPs for occasional backup flood protection. |
| Where possible they should be integrated into amenity space, given that users rarely wish to continue outdoor activities during such intense rainstorms. | | Where possible they should be integrated into amenity space, given that users rarely wish to continue outdoor activities during such intense rainstorms. |
| + | |
| + | Compared to wet ponds “Dry ponds… …are less expensive to install, require less maintenance and may involve less liability for the communities around them.” |
| + | https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/soil-water-conservation/understanding-stormwater-ponds |
| | | |
| ===Risk=== | | ===Risk=== |
Line 102: |
Line 105: |
| | | |
| ===Detention time=== | | ===Detention time=== |
− | A detention time of 24 hours should be targeted in all instances. Where this necessaitates a very low outflow, a [[Flow control#Vortex valve|vortex valve]] or similar is recommended over an orifice or pipe restiction. The detention time is approximated by the drawdown time. | + | A detention time of 24 hours should be targeted in all instances. Where this necessaitates a very low outflow, a [[Flow control#Vortex valve|vortex valve]] or similar is recommended over an [[orifice]] or pipe restiction. The detention time is approximated by the drawdown time. |
| The drawdown time in the pond can be estimated using the classic falling head orifice equation which assumes a constant pond surface area<ref name="MOE"/>. This assumption is generally not valid, and a more accurate estimation can be made if the equation is solved as a differential equation. This is easily done if the relationship between pond surface area and pond depth is approximated using a linear regression: | | The drawdown time in the pond can be estimated using the classic falling head orifice equation which assumes a constant pond surface area<ref name="MOE"/>. This assumption is generally not valid, and a more accurate estimation can be made if the equation is solved as a differential equation. This is easily done if the relationship between pond surface area and pond depth is approximated using a linear regression: |
| | | |
Line 136: |
Line 139: |
| ==External links== | | ==External links== |
| *[https://www.edmonton.ca/residential_neighbourhoods/PDF/handout_nov_ld.pdf Edmonton Dry Ponds] | | *[https://www.edmonton.ca/residential_neighbourhoods/PDF/handout_nov_ld.pdf Edmonton Dry Ponds] |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | ==To review== |
| + | https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.calgary.ca%2FUEP%2FWater%2FPublishingImages%2FBraeside-Dry-Pond-610px.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.calgary.ca%2FWWCDI&docid=RBtJ2qx0jhourM&tbnid=-OUrotj9LMYmfM%3A&vet=10ahUKEwjpwbyNt-bfAhXlguAKHS1pDtQQMwhjKBcwFw..i&w=610&h=299&bih=723&biw=1536&q=traplow%20stormwater&ved=0ahUKEwjpwbyNt-bfAhXlguAKHS1pDtQQMwhjKBcwFw&iact=mrc&uact=8 |
| + | https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/publicworks/sites/publicworks/files/assets/documents/drypond_1.pdf |
| | | |
| ---- | | ---- |
| [[category: Modeling]] | | [[category: Modeling]] |