Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:  
|-
 
|-
 
!Application
 
!Application
|Impervious area to pervious area (I:P) ratio greater than 20:1
+
|Impervious area to pervious area (I:P) ratio of 15:1 or greater
 
|
 
|
 
{{Plainlist|1=
 
{{Plainlist|1=
Line 41: Line 41:  
!Recommended test method
 
!Recommended test method
 
|-
 
|-
!Particle-size distribution (PSD)
+
![[Grain size analysis| Particle-size distribution (PSD)]]
|< 25% silt- and clay-sized particles (smaller than 0.05 mm) combined; <br> 3 to 12% clay-sized particles (0.002 mm or smaller)||ASTM D7928, Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis.
+
|< 25% silt- and clay-sized particles (smaller than 0.05 mm) combined; <br> 3 to 12% clay-sized particles (0.002 mm or smaller)||ASTM D6913/D6913M, Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis (pebble to sand fraction); and <br>
 +
ASTM D7928, Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis (silt and clay fraction).
 
|-
 
|-
![[Organic matter]]
+
![[Organic matter| Organic matter (OM)]]
 
|3 to 10% by dry weight||ASTM F1647, Standard Test Methods for Organic Matter Content of Athletic Field Rootzone Mixes.
 
|3 to 10% by dry weight||ASTM F1647, Standard Test Methods for Organic Matter Content of Athletic Field Rootzone Mixes.
 
|-
 
|-
!Phosphorus (plant available, or extractable soil phosphorus)
+
![[Phosphorus| Phosphorus, plant-available or extractable]]
 
|12 to 40 ppm||As measured by the 'Olsen' method for alkaline and calcareous soils (common in Ontario). Alternatives include 'Mehlich I or III', or 'Bray', which is better suited to acidic to slightly alkaline and non-calcareous soils. NB: Results from different test methods are not directly comparable.<ref>Sawyer JE, Mallarino AP. Differentiating and Understanding the Mehlich 3, Bray, and Olsen Soil Phosphorus Tests 1. http://www.agronext.iastate.edu/soilfertility/info/mnconf11_22_99.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2017.</ref>
 
|12 to 40 ppm||As measured by the 'Olsen' method for alkaline and calcareous soils (common in Ontario). Alternatives include 'Mehlich I or III', or 'Bray', which is better suited to acidic to slightly alkaline and non-calcareous soils. NB: Results from different test methods are not directly comparable.<ref>Sawyer JE, Mallarino AP. Differentiating and Understanding the Mehlich 3, Bray, and Olsen Soil Phosphorus Tests 1. http://www.agronext.iastate.edu/soilfertility/info/mnconf11_22_99.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2017.</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
![[Cationic exchange capacity (CEC)]]
+
![[Cationic exchange capacity(CEC)| Cationic exchange capacity (CEC)]]
 
|> 10 meq/100 g||ASTM D7503, Standard Test Methods for Measuring the Exchange Complex and Cation Exchange Capacity of Inorganic Fine-Grained Soils.  
 
|> 10 meq/100 g||ASTM D7503, Standard Test Methods for Measuring the Exchange Complex and Cation Exchange Capacity of Inorganic Fine-Grained Soils.  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 67: Line 68:  
   
 
   
 
===Compost===
 
===Compost===
Compost is the most widely used organic component. It's use in bioretention facilities is well established and documented. Low-phosphorus composts should always be sought for use in low impact development facilities, including bioretention. These are typically created from feedstocks including yard, leaf, and wood waste, and excluding manures, biosolids, and food scraps.<ref>Hurley S, Shrestha P, Cording A. Nutrient Leaching from Compost: Implications for Bioretention and Other Green Stormwater Infrastructure. J Sustain Water Built Environ. 2017;3(3):4017006. doi:10.1061/JSWBAY.0000821.</ref><br>
+
[[Compost]] is the most widely used organic component. It's use in bioretention facilities is well established and documented. In Ontario, compost should comply with mandatory Ontario Compost Quality Standards for Category 'AA'.<ref>Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (OMOECC). 2012. Ontario Compost Quality
'''[[Compost|Compost Specifications]]'''
+
Standards, July 25, 2012. PIBS 8412. Queen’s Printer of Ontario, Toronto, ON.
 +
https://www.ontario.ca/page/ontario-compost-quality-standards.</ref> See [[Compost]] page for a summary of Category 'AA" compost standards. Compost should also be certified to meet quality parameters recommended under the Compost Council of Canada Compost Quality Alliance (CQA) program.<ref>A & L Canada Laboratories. 2004. Compost Management Program. London, ON.
 +
http://www.alcanada.com/index_htm_files/compost_handbook.pdf.</ref> Low available phosphorus composts should always be sought for use in low impact development facilities, including bioretention. Low available phosphorus composts are typically created from feedstocks including yard, leaf, and wood waste, and excluding manures, biosolids, and food scraps.<ref>Hurley S, Shrestha P, Cording A. Nutrient Leaching from Compost: Implications for Bioretention and Other Green Stormwater Infrastructure. J Sustain Water Built Environ. 2017;3(3):4017006. doi:10.1061/JSWBAY.0000821.</ref><br>
 +
<br>
   −
Even low-phosphorus composts are known to export phosphorus over many years. The use of compost is not recommended in nutrient-sensitive watersheds where phosphorus pollution is a concern. There are a number of alternative sources of soil organic matter which have undergone field studies which have benefits and potential concerns:
+
===Organic component alternatives===
 +
Even low-phosphorus composts are known to export phosphorus over many years. The use of compost is not recommended in nutrient-sensitive watersheds where phosphorus pollution is a concern, or an [[Additives| additive]] to enhance nutrient retention of the media should also be included in the blend, or a layer be included above the stone reservoir, or a reactive media vault be included in the treatment train downstream of the bioretention (see Additive below for available options). There are a number of alternative sources of soil organic matter which have undergone field studies which have benefits and potential concerns:
    
{|class="wikitable"
 
{|class="wikitable"
Line 82: Line 87:  
|Doesn't leach phosphorus||Must be imported
 
|Doesn't leach phosphorus||Must be imported
 
|-
 
|-
!Wood chip
+
!Wood chips
 
|Doesn't leach phosphorus<br>Promotes nitrogen removal from water||
 
|Doesn't leach phosphorus<br>Promotes nitrogen removal from water||
 
|-
 
|-
!Peat Moss
+
!Peat moss
|Doesn't leach phosphorus||Must be extracted from natural wetlands
+
|Doesn't leach phosphorus||Must be unsustainably extracted from natural wetlands
 
|-
 
|-
 
!Shredded paper (e.g., Pittmoss)
 
!Shredded paper (e.g., Pittmoss)
 
|Doesn't leach phosphorus<br>Promotes denitrification
 
|Doesn't leach phosphorus<br>Promotes denitrification
|||
+
|
 
|}
 
|}
      
===Wood derivatives===
 
===Wood derivatives===

Navigation menu