Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
[[File:Sandy Bioretention Soil Mix.jpg|thumb|Sandy filter media mix.]]
 
[[File:Sandy Bioretention Soil Mix.jpg|thumb|Sandy filter media mix.]]
 +
[[File:Media hand.jpg|thumb|Filter media being used for an online [[bioswale|bioretention swale]] (also of previous, more sandy specification)]]
 
{{TOClimit|2}}
 
{{TOClimit|2}}
   Line 10: Line 11:  
!Blend B: Water quality priority
 
!Blend B: Water quality priority
 
|-
 
|-
|Application
+
!Application
 
|Higher I/P ratio
 
|Higher I/P ratio
 
|
 
|
Line 17: Line 18:  
*Improved [[heavy metals|metals]] and [[phosphorus]] retention.}}  
 
*Improved [[heavy metals|metals]] and [[phosphorus]] retention.}}  
 
|-
 
|-
|Proportions
+
!Proportions
 
|
 
|
 
3 parts [[sand]]<br>  
 
3 parts [[sand]]<br>  
Line 25: Line 26:  
2 parts [[topsoil]]<br>  
 
2 parts [[topsoil]]<br>  
 
1 part sand [[Bioretention: Filter media#Organic components|organic soil components]] and [[Bioretention: Filter media#Additives|additives]]
 
1 part sand [[Bioretention: Filter media#Organic components|organic soil components]] and [[Bioretention: Filter media#Additives|additives]]
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
|This mixture may be assumed to have available water storage of [[Bioretention media storage|'''0.4''' unless demonstrated otherwise]]
 +
|This mixture may be assumed to have available water storage of '''0.35''' unless demonstrated otherwise
 
|}
 
|}
   Line 41: Line 46:  
|-
 
|-
 
![[Organic matter]] (OM)
 
![[Organic matter]] (OM)
|5 - 10 %||ASTM D2974-14, Standard test methods for moisture, ash and organic matter of peat and other organic soils.
+
|5 - 10 %||ASTM F1647, Standard test methods for organic matter content of athletic field rootzone mixes.
 
|-
 
|-
 
![[Phosphorus]]
 
![[Phosphorus]]
|12 - 40 ppm||As measured by the 'Bray' method. Alternatives include 'Mehlich I or III', or 'Olsen'. Results from these are not directly translatable.<ref>Sawyer JE, Mallarino AP. Differentiating and Understanding the Mehlich 3, Bray, and Olsen Soil Phosphorus Tests 1. http://www.agronext.iastate.edu/soilfertility/info/mnconf11_22_99.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2017.</ref>
+
|12 - 40 ppm||As measured by the 'Olsen' method for alkaline and calcareous soils (common in Ontario). Alternatives include 'Mehlich I or III', or 'Bray', better suited to acidic to slightly alkaline and non-calcareous soils. Results from these are not directly translatable.<ref>Sawyer JE, Mallarino AP. Differentiating and Understanding the Mehlich 3, Bray, and Olsen Soil Phosphorus Tests 1. http://www.agronext.iastate.edu/soilfertility/info/mnconf11_22_99.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2017.</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
![[Cationic exchange capacity(CEC)]]
 
![[Cationic exchange capacity(CEC)]]
|10 meq/100 g||ASTM D7503-10, Standard test method for measuring the exchange complex and cation exchange capacity of inorganic fine grained soils.  
+
|10 meq/100 g||ASTM D7503-10, Standard test methods for measuring the exchange complex and cation exchange capacity of inorganic fine grained soils.  
 
|-
 
|-
 
![[Hydraulic conductivity]]
 
![[Hydraulic conductivity]]
Line 90: Line 95:     
===Wood derivatives===
 
===Wood derivatives===
https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/default/files/media/unhsc_bsm_spec_2-28-17_0.pdf
+
The 2017 guidance from New Hampshire specifically rules against the inclusion of compost in their bioretention media.<ref>UNHSC Bioretention Soil Specification. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/default/files/media/unhsc_bsm_spec_2-28-17_0.pdf</ref> Instead they recommend sphagnum peat or ''"Shredded wood, wood chips, ground bark, or wood waste; of uniform texture and free of stones, sticks"''. The use of wood chip has been common in New Hampshire for some time, in this 2006 thesis 20 % wood chips (not characterized) were incorporated into all of the test cases to match current practices at the time. <ref>Stone, R. M. (2013). Evaluation and Optimization of Bioretention Design for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal. University of New Hampshire. Retrieved from https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE THESIS FINAL.pdf</ref>
https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf
+
 
https://jbioleng.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13036-017-0057-4 (focus on denitrification)
+
Shredded paper has been tested as an additional source of carbon and as an electron-donor to promote denitrification in a number of successful laboratory and field studies.
 +
<ref>
    
==Additives==
 
==Additives==

Navigation menu