Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[File:Sandy Bioretention Soil Mix.jpg|thumb|Sandy filter media mix.]] | | [[File:Sandy Bioretention Soil Mix.jpg|thumb|Sandy filter media mix.]] |
| + | [[File:Media hand.jpg|thumb|Filter media being used for an online [[bioswale|bioretention swale]] (also of previous, more sandy specification)]] |
| {{TOClimit|2}} | | {{TOClimit|2}} |
| | | |
Line 10: |
Line 11: |
| !Blend B: Water quality priority | | !Blend B: Water quality priority |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Application
| + | !Application |
| |Higher I/P ratio | | |Higher I/P ratio |
| | | | | |
Line 17: |
Line 18: |
| *Improved [[heavy metals|metals]] and [[phosphorus]] retention.}} | | *Improved [[heavy metals|metals]] and [[phosphorus]] retention.}} |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Proportions
| + | !Proportions |
| | | | | |
| 3 parts [[sand]]<br> | | 3 parts [[sand]]<br> |
Line 25: |
Line 26: |
| 2 parts [[topsoil]]<br> | | 2 parts [[topsoil]]<br> |
| 1 part sand [[Bioretention: Filter media#Organic components|organic soil components]] and [[Bioretention: Filter media#Additives|additives]] | | 1 part sand [[Bioretention: Filter media#Organic components|organic soil components]] and [[Bioretention: Filter media#Additives|additives]] |
| + | |- |
| + | ! |
| + | |This mixture may be assumed to have available water storage of [[Bioretention media storage|'''0.4''' unless demonstrated otherwise]] |
| + | |This mixture may be assumed to have available water storage of '''0.35''' unless demonstrated otherwise |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 38: |
Line 43: |
| |- | | |- |
| ![[Texture]] | | ![[Texture]] |
− | |<20 % fines||Hygrometer | + | |<15 % fines||Hygrometer |
| |- | | |- |
| ![[Organic matter]] (OM) | | ![[Organic matter]] (OM) |
Line 90: |
Line 95: |
| | | |
| ===Wood derivatives=== | | ===Wood derivatives=== |
− | https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/default/files/media/unhsc_bsm_spec_2-28-17_0.pdf | + | The 2017 guidance from New Hampshire specifically rules against the inclusion of compost in their bioretention media.<ref>UNHSC Bioretention Soil Specification. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/default/files/media/unhsc_bsm_spec_2-28-17_0.pdf</ref> Instead they recommend sphagnum peat or ''"Shredded wood, wood chips, ground bark, or wood waste; of uniform texture and free of stones, sticks"''. The use of wood chip has been common in New Hampshire for some time, in this 2006 thesis 20 % wood chips (not characterized) were incorporated into all of the test cases to match current practices at the time. <ref>Stone, R. M. (2013). Evaluation and Optimization of Bioretention Design for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal. University of New Hampshire. Retrieved from https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE THESIS FINAL.pdf</ref> |
− | https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf | + | |
− | https://jbioleng.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13036-017-0057-4 (focus on denitrification)
| + | Shredded paper has been tested as an additional source of carbon and as an electron-donor to promote denitrification in a number of successful laboratory and field studies. |
| + | <ref> |
| | | |
| ==Additives== | | ==Additives== |