8,255
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 20:
Line 20: + + + + + + + + Line 65:
Line 73: − − ===Infiltration=== − Some form of stormwater landscaping (bioretention) can be fitted into most spaces. Although there are some [[Infiltration#Constraints|constraints]] to infiltrating water, it is preferable to do so where possible. − Designing bioretention without an underdrain is highly desirable wherever the soils permit infiltration at a great enough rate to empty the facility between storm events. Volume reduction is primarily through infiltration to the underlying soils, with some evapotranspiration. As there is no outflow from this BMP, it is particularly useful in areas where [[nutrient management]] is a concern to the watershed. − − Bioretention with an [[underdrain]] is a popular choice over 'tighter' soils where infiltration rates are ≤ 15 mm/hr. Including an perforated [[pipe]] in the [[reservoir aggregates|reservoir]] layer help to empty the facility between storm events, even over [[low permeability soils]]. The drain discharges to a downstream point, which could be an underground [[infiltration trench]] or [[chamber]] facility. Volume reduction is gained through infiltration and [[evapotranspiration]]. By raising the outlet of the discharge pipe the bottom portion of the BMP can only drain through infiltration. This creates a fluctuating anaerobic/aerobic environment which promotes denitrification. Increasing the period of storage has benefits for promoting infiltration, but also improves water quality for catchments impacted with nitrates. A complimentary technique is to use fresh wood mulch, which also fosters denitrifying biological processes.
no edit summary
==Planning considerations==
==Planning considerations==
===Infiltration===
Some form of stormwater landscaping (bioretention) can be fitted into most spaces. Although there are some [[Infiltration#Constraints|constraints]] to infiltrating water, it is preferable to do so where possible.
Designing bioretention without an underdrain is highly desirable wherever the soils permit infiltration at a great enough rate to empty the facility between storm events. Volume reduction is primarily through infiltration to the underlying soils, with some evapotranspiration. As there is no outflow from this BMP, it is particularly useful in areas where nutrient management is a concern to the watershed.
Bioretention with an [[underdrain]] is a popular choice over 'tighter' soils where infiltration rates are ≤ 15 mm/hr. Including an perforated [[pipe]] in the [[reservoir aggregates|reservoir]] layer help to empty the facility between storm events, even over [[low permeability soils]]. The drain discharges to a downstream point, which could be an underground [[infiltration trench]] or [[chamber]] facility. Volume reduction is gained through infiltration and [[evapotranspiration]]. By raising the outlet of the discharge pipe the bottom portion of the BMP can only drain through infiltration. This creates a fluctuating anaerobic/aerobic environment which promotes denitrification. Increasing the period of storage has benefits for promoting infiltration, but also improves water quality for catchments impacted with nitrates. A complimentary technique is to use fresh wood mulch, which also fosters denitrifying biological processes.
Where infiltration is entirely impossible, but the design calls for planted landscaping, try a [[stormwater planter]] instead.
===Space===
===Space===
*For optimal performance bioretention facilities should receive runoff from between 5 to 20 times their own surface area.
*For optimal performance bioretention facilities should receive runoff from between 5 to 20 times their own surface area.
*'''[[Bioretention: Sizing| Sizing]]'''
*'''[[Bioretention: Sizing| Sizing]]'''
*'''[[Bioretention: TTT| Modelling]]'''
*'''[[Bioretention: TTT| Modelling]]'''
===Inlets and pretreatment options===
===Inlets and pretreatment options===