Line 44: |
Line 44: |
| !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" rowspan = "2"|Duration | | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" rowspan = "2"|Duration |
| !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" colspan= "3"|Site characteristics | | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" colspan= "3"|Site characteristics |
− | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" rowspan = "2"|Runoff reduction | + | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white" rowspan = "2"|Runoff reduction (%) |
| |- | | |- |
| !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Native soil | | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Native soil |
Line 50: |
Line 50: |
| !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Sump depth* | | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Sump depth* |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "VS 2015"> Van Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario"</ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||80% | + | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "VS 2015"> Van Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario"</ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||80 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Bioretention<ref name = "VS 2015"></ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||90% | + | |Bioretention<ref name = "VS 2015"></ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||90 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Permeable Pavement<ref>Van Seters, T. and Drake, J., 2015, Five year evaluation of Permeable Pavements, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||5 growing seasons||Silty clay||1:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||45% | + | |Permeable Pavement<ref>Van Seters, T. and Drake, J., 2015, Five year evaluation of Permeable Pavements, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||5 growing seasons||Silty clay||1:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||45 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Bioretention<ref>STEP study ongoing (2017)</ref>||1 growing season||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||83% | + | |Bioretention<ref>STEP study ongoing (2017)</ref>||1 growing season||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||83 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Bioretention <ref>Van Seters T and Graham C, 2014, Performance Evaluation of a Bioretention System, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Silty clay||11:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||91% | + | |Bioretention <ref>Van Seters T and Graham C, 2014, Performance Evaluation of a Bioretention System, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Silty clay||11:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||91 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Infiltration chamber<ref name = "DY 2013">Young D, Van Seters T, Graham, C, 2013, Evaluation of Residential Lot Level Stormwater Practices – tech brief</ref>||2 years||Sandy silt||20:1||Approx.: 1.2 m||90% | + | |Infiltration chamber<ref name = "DY 2013">Young D, Van Seters T, Graham, C, 2013, Evaluation of Residential Lot Level Stormwater Practices – tech brief</ref>||2 years||Sandy silt||20:1||Approx.: 1.2 m||90 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||64:1||2 m||36% | + | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||64:1||2 m||36 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||155:1||2 m||16% | + | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||155:1||2 m||16 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Exfiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2005. Performance Assessment of a Perforated Pipe Stormwater Exfiltration system, Toronto, Ontario, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Clay to clay silt till over silty sand till||Approx: 7:1||0.65 m||>90% | + | |Exfiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2005. Performance Assessment of a Perforated Pipe Stormwater Exfiltration system, Toronto, Ontario, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Clay to clay silt till over silty sand till||Approx: 7:1||0.65 m||>90 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Infiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2002, Performance Assessment of a Swale Perforated Pipe Stormwater Infiltration System, TRCA, Toronto Ontario</ref>||2 years||Silty sand with clayey silt deposits||Approx: 4:1||1 m||89% | + | |Infiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2002, Performance Assessment of a Swale Perforated Pipe Stormwater Infiltration System, TRCA, Toronto Ontario</ref>||2 years||Silty sand with clayey silt deposits||Approx: 4:1||1 m||89 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Permeable pavement + bioretention<ref>CVCa</ref>||4 years||Clayey silt on silt till||Approx: 6:1||?||80% | + | |Permeable pavement + bioretention<ref>CVCa</ref>||4 years||Clayey silt on silt till||Approx: 6:1||?||80 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Bioretention<ref>CVCb</ref>||4 years||Silty clay||Approx.: 10:1||?||92% | + | |Bioretention<ref>CVCb</ref>||4 years||Silty clay||Approx.: 10:1||?||92 |
| |- | | |- |
− | |Bioretention<ref>CVCc</ref>||4 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||30:1||?||72% | + | |Bioretention<ref>CVCc</ref>||4 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||30:1||?||72 |
| |- | | |- |
| |Permeable pavement<ref>CVCd</ref>||4 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||1:1||?||? | | |Permeable pavement<ref>CVCd</ref>||4 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||1:1||?||? |