Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 146: Line 146:     
This technical brief discusses TRCA's study that evaluated the effectiveness of meeting provincial and municipal stormwater management and flood control criteria on a commercial property by using a combination of decentralized LID practices as an alternative to sole reliance on centralized stormwater detention facilities. Practices incorporated into the design included [[Bioretention]], [[Permeable pavements]], [[Swales]] and [[Rainwater harvesting]] and re-use for landscape irrigation. Results from the study period found that, relative to a conventional stormwater approach without LID, runoff was reduced by 30-35% for the entire site, and by 58-62% in the catchment with a higher density of LID practices, peak flows were also reduced by 65 to 79%. To learn more about the details of these performance metrics click the button above.
 
This technical brief discusses TRCA's study that evaluated the effectiveness of meeting provincial and municipal stormwater management and flood control criteria on a commercial property by using a combination of decentralized LID practices as an alternative to sole reliance on centralized stormwater detention facilities. Practices incorporated into the design included [[Bioretention]], [[Permeable pavements]], [[Swales]] and [[Rainwater harvesting]] and re-use for landscape irrigation. Results from the study period found that, relative to a conventional stormwater approach without LID, runoff was reduced by 30-35% for the entire site, and by 58-62% in the catchment with a higher density of LID practices, peak flows were also reduced by 65 to 79%. To learn more about the details of these performance metrics click the button above.
 +
 +
{{Clickable button|[[File:Assessment biore.PNG|150 px|link=https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2015/01/PP-Tech-Brief-Final.pdf]]}}
 +
 +
This technical brief discusses TRCA's study that evaluated the hydrologic, water quality and functional performance of three different [[Permeable pavements]] (PP) installed on a parking lot at the TRCA’s Living City Campus in Vaughan, Ontario. The performance of the PPs was compared to that of a conventional asphalt pavement. Fine textured native soils below the pavements had low permeability with up to 30% clay content. Over a 22 month period, the PPs generated 43% less runoff than the asphalt pavement. Small rain events less than 7 mm were fully infiltrated and evaporated. To read more about the performance of these three different pavers click the button above.
    
{{Clickable button|[[File:Lakeview neighbourhood.PNG|130 px|link=https://cvc.ca/wp-content/uploads//2021/07/CaseStudy_Lakeview_Final.pdf]]}}
 
{{Clickable button|[[File:Lakeview neighbourhood.PNG|130 px|link=https://cvc.ca/wp-content/uploads//2021/07/CaseStudy_Lakeview_Final.pdf]]}}

Navigation menu