Difference between revisions of "Bioretention media storage"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) m |
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This has been calculated as the difference between the media porosity and field capacity. | This has been calculated as the difference between the media porosity and field capacity. | ||
# Marine sand: 0.51 - 0.06 = 0.45 <ref name=Liu>Liu, Ruifen, and Elizabeth Fassman-Beck. “Pore Structure and Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Engineered Media for Living Roofs and Bioretention Based on Water Retention Data.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 23, no. 3 (March 2018): 04017065. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001621</ref> | # Marine sand: 0.51 - 0.06 = 0.45 <ref name=Liu>Liu, Ruifen, and Elizabeth Fassman-Beck. “Pore Structure and Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Engineered Media for Living Roofs and Bioretention Based on Water Retention Data.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 23, no. 3 (March 2018): 04017065. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001621</ref> | ||
− | # Marine sand with 10 % compost: 0.51 - 0.11 = 0.40 < | + | # Marine sand with 10 % compost: 0.51 - 0.11 = 0.40 <ref name=Liu/> |
− | # Marine sand with 20 % compost: 0.53 - 0.12 = 0.41 < | + | # Marine sand with 20 % compost: 0.53 - 0.12 = 0.41 <rev name=Liu/> |
− | # Marine sand with 20 % compost & 20 % topsoil: 0.52 - 0.16 = 0.36 < | + | # Marine sand with 20 % compost & 20 % topsoil: 0.52 - 0.16 = 0.36 <rev name=Liu/> |
Revision as of 23:28, 11 November 2018
Bioretention filter media may be assumed to have a storage capacity of 0.4.
This has been calculated as the difference between the media porosity and field capacity.