Difference between revisions of "Wetlands"

Revision as of 22:57, 29 September 2018

Wetlands fed by stormwater at Kortright Farm, Vaughan ON

Overview[edit]

Constructed wetlands are similar to SWM ponds in function and design, with the most significant difference being that they are designed to incorporate shallow zones for wetland plants. A facility is normally characterized as a wetland if shallow zones (<0.5 m deep) make up more than 70 % of its volume.

Wetlands are an ideal technology for:

Text A
Text B

Types of Constructed Wetland
Free-water surface flow	Horizontal sub-surface flow	Vertical sub-surface flow

Surface water	Minimal Any surface flow can be slowed with check dams	Ponding is encouraged with check dams
Soil	Filter media required	Amendment preferable when possible
Underdrain	Common	Uncommon
Maintenance	Medium to high	Low
Stormwater benefit	High	Moderate
Biodiversity benefit	Increased with native planting	Typically lower

Planning considerations[edit]

Design[edit]

Element	Design Objective	Criteria
Drainage Area	Sustaining vegetation, volumetric turnover	5 Ha (≥10 Ha preferred)
Treatment Volume	Provision of appropriate level of protection (Table 3.2)	See Table 3.2
Active Storage	Detention	Suspended solids settling 24 hrs (12 hrs if in conflict with min. orifice size)
Forebay	Pre-treatment	Minimum depth: 1 m; Sized to ensure non-erosive velocities leaving forebay; Maximum area: 20 % of total permanent pool
Length-to-Width Ratio	Maximize flow path and minimize short-circuiting potential	Overall: minimum 3:1; Forebay: minimum 2:1
Permanent Pool Depth	Vegetation requirements, rapid settling	The average permanent pool depth should range from 150 mm to 300 mm
Active Storage Depth	Storage/flow control, sustaining vegetation	Maximum 1.0 m for storms < 10 year event
Side Slopes	Safety	5:1 For 3 m above and below permanent pool; Maximum 3:1 elsewhere
Inlet	Avoid clogging/freezing	Minimum 450 mm; Preferred pipe slope: >1%; If submerged, obvert 150 mm below expected maximum ice depth
Outlet	Avoid clogging/freezing	Minimum: 450mm outlet pipe; Preferred pipe slope: >1%; If orifice control used, 75mm diameter minimum; Minimum 100mm orifice preferable
Maintenance Access	Access for backhoes or dredging equipment	Provided to approval of Municipality; Provision of maintenance drawdown pipe preferred
Buffer	Safety	Minimum 7.5 m above maximum water quality/erosion control water level

Performance[edit]

Relative to a wet pond, a constructed wetland may offer added pollutant removal benefits due to enhanced biological uptake and the filtration effects of the vegetation.

STEP (under previous name SWAMP) conducted their own research into the performance of stormwater wetlands, the project page and report can be viewed here.

Modeling[edit]

SubWet 2.0 is a modeling tool for subsurface flow wetlands (both 100% constructed and naturalized/adapted). It can be used to simulate removal of nitrogen (including nitrogen in ammonia, nitrate and organic matter), phosphorus and BOD5 in mg/l and the corresponding removal efficiencies (in %). Although the model has been calibrated already with data from cold and warm climates, users can further calibrate and validate it using local data observations.

Gallery[edit]

Wetlands on the Rouge River, Toronto ON. Photo credit: Vlad Litvinov (flickr)
Emergent wetland vegetation supported by stormwater runoff at Kino Environmental Restoration Project. Photo by Matthew Grabau, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Azalea Park, Charlottesville VA - "This side of the park, formerly located along a runoff channel that led into Moore's Creek, has been converted into a wetland which supports a surprising amount of insect and amphibian life." -Credit and Photo: Scott Clark (certhia on Flickr).
Walberswick Mill sluice, part of the water level control and coastal defence infrastructure within the marshes, UK

Construction[edit]

External links[edit]

Kennedy, G., and T. Mayer. 2002. Natural and Constructed Wetlands in Canada: An Overview. Water Qual. Res. J. Canada 37(2): 295–325. doi: 10.2166/wqrj.2002.020. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/constructed-wetlands-handbook.pdf

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 !Vertical sub-surface flow
 |-
-|[[File:Schematic of the Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland.jpg|frame|50 px|Schematic of a free-water surface constructed wetland: It aims to replicate the naturally occurring processes, where particles settle, pathogens are destroyed, and organisms and plants utilize the nutrients.]]
+|[[File:Schematic of the Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland.jpg|frameless|Schematic of a free-water surface constructed wetland: It aims to replicate the naturally occurring processes, where particles settle, pathogens are destroyed, and organisms and plants utilize the nutrients.]]
-|[[File:Tilley et al 2014 Schematic of the Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland.jpg|frame|50 px|Schematic of the Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland: Water flows horizontally through the bed.]]
+|[[File:Tilley et al 2014 Schematic of the Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland.jpg|frameless|50 px|Schematic of the Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland: Water flows horizontally through the bed.]]
-|[[File:Tilley et al 2014 Schematic of the Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland.jpg|frame|50 px|Schematic of a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland: Water flows through pipes on the subsurface of the ground through the root zone to the ground.]]
+|[[File:Tilley et al 2014 Schematic of the Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland.jpg|frameless|Schematic of a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland: Water flows through pipes on the subsurface of the ground through the root zone to the ground.]]
 |-
 |Surface water||Minimal<br>Any surface flow can be slowed with check dams||Ponding is encouraged with check dams