Difference between revisions of "Talk:Permeable Pavement Design Guide"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
!colspan="10" style="background: brown; color: white"|United States | !colspan="10" style="background: brown; color: white"|United States | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | !colspan="2" style="backgroung=green; color:white"|Permeable Pavement|| CVC+TRCA (Factsheets-2010)<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/lid-swm-guide-apdxa- | + | !colspan="2" style="backgroung=green; color:white"|Permeable Pavement|| CVC+TRCA (Factsheets-2010)<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/lid-swm-guide-apdxa-permeable-pavement.pdf</ref>|| Toronto- 2016 || LID-SWM Guide 2010<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/LID-SWM-Guide-v1.0_2010_1_no-appendices.pdf</ref>|| LID-Design Guide Edmonton- 2014|| New York State SWM Design Manual-2015|| Massachusets SW BMP-2013 || District of Columbia-SWM Guidebook-2010 || San Diego LID Handbook-2014|| Alabama LID Handbook-2013 || W. Virginia-SWM design guidance manual-2012 || Rhode Island-SW design & Installation Standards Manual-2012 || Minnesota SW Manual-2016 || Tennessee-LID Development-SWM 2016 || Texas-LID Technical Guidance Manual-2013 |
|- | |- |
Revision as of 19:24, 3 October 2017
LID Practice | CANADA | United States | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permeable Pavement | CVC+TRCA (Factsheets-2010)[1] | Toronto- 2016 | LID-SWM Guide 2010[2] | LID-Design Guide Edmonton- 2014 | New York State SWM Design Manual-2015 | Massachusets SW BMP-2013 | District of Columbia-SWM Guidebook-2010 | San Diego LID Handbook-2014 | Alabama LID Handbook-2013 | W. Virginia-SWM design guidance manual-2012 | Rhode Island-SW design & Installation Standards Manual-2012 | Minnesota SW Manual-2016 | Tennessee-LID Development-SWM 2016 | Texas-LID Technical Guidance Manual-2013 | |
(Impervious /permeable pavemet) area | <= 1.2 | <= 1.2 | < =3.0 | Limit CDA to small adjacent impervious area | 2-5 X the SA of PP | 2:1 | 3:1 | 2:1 | DA nolimit, runoff from surrounding areas minimized | 2:1-5:1 Note 1 | L1- 1:1, L2- No IP Note 2 | 1:1 | |||
Depth to high water table (m) | 1 | at least 1 | 0.6-1.0 | ||||||||||||
Slope of permeable pavement surface (%) | 1-5 | 1-5 | 0.5-2.0 | ||||||||||||
A capped vertical sandpipe, perfored instaled to the bottom of the facility to monitor drainage time | 100-150 mm | ||||||||||||||
Botom slope if the system is not designed for infiltratin (%) | 1-5 | 1-5 | |||||||||||||
Drainage time of the pavement reservoir after the storm event | < 72 hr | recommended 48 | |||||||||||||
Setback from building Foundation(m) | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||
Material | |||||||||||||||
Pervious Concrete | |||||||||||||||
Compressive strength (Mpa) | 5.5-20 | PA and PC must have 10-25% VS,sub-base 40% VS | PC VS:15-25%; PA VS: 15-20%; PICP VS:8-20%; CGP VS:20-50% | PICP OA: 5-15%, CGP OVC: 20-50%; PC VC:15-25%; PA VC: 15-20% | PA/PC: 10-25% void space, pavers 15% void ratio | ||||||||||
Void ratio (%) | 14-31 | 15-25 | 14-31 | ||||||||||||
Permeability (mm/hr) | 900-21500 | 900-21500 | |||||||||||||
Thickness (mm) | 100-150 | 100-150 | 100-150 | ||||||||||||
Porous Asphalt | |||||||||||||||
Air voids (%) | min. 16 | min. 16 | min. 16 | ||||||||||||
Thickness (mm) | 50-100 | 50-100 | 50-100 | ||||||||||||
Permeable Pavers | |||||||||||||||
Diameter of crushed aggregate (mm) | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||
Thickness for vehicular applications (mm) | 80 | 80 | |||||||||||||
Thickness for pedistrian applications (mm) | 60 | 60 | |||||||||||||
Joint widths for pedistrian applications (mm) | < 15 | < 15 | |||||||||||||
Interlocking concrete pavers | |||||||||||||||
Thickness (mm) | 60-80 | ||||||||||||||
Stone reservoir | |||||||||||||||
Filter course diameter | 10-12 mm | ||||||||||||||
Depth below base pf pavement | 25-30 | ||||||||||||||
Depth below subbase, mm | 50-500 | ||||||||||||||
Subbase diameter | 25-40 mm | ||||||||||||||
Depth below filter course | 50-250 mm | ||||||||||||||
Granular subbase stone diameter (mm) | 50 | 50 | 50 | > 50 | |||||||||||
Void space ratio | 0.4 | 0.4 | |||||||||||||
Granular base stone diameter (mm) | 20 | ||||||||||||||
Void space ratio | 0.3-0.4 | ||||||||||||||
Bedding stone diameter (mm) | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Time to drain stone bed, hr | 24-72 | ||||||||||||||
Thickness (mm) | 40-75 | 40-75 | 40-75 | ||||||||||||
Geotextile | |||||||||||||||
Between stone reseroir and native soil | |||||||||||||||
Underdrain (optional), infiltratio rate <15 mm/hr | |||||||||||||||
Diameter (mm) | >= 100 | > 200 | >= 100 | ||||||||||||
Diameter of perforations in pipes (mm) | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||
Above the bottom of the gravel layer (mm) | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Facilties reciving road runoff are not located within time of travel wellhead protection areas, year | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||
Subsoil infiltration rate, mm/hr. | >= 13 | ||||||||||||||
When contact with anti-skid material | >= 26 | ||||||||||||||
When contributing area > 4 hectares | >=35 | ||||||||||||||
Emptying Time, hrs. | < 72 |
- Note 1: IP ratio increases when clean roof runoff, or if runoff pre-treated; PICP OA: 5-15%, PC VC:15-35%; PA VC:16-20% - Note 2: L1-45% runoff reduction credit, L2-75%; PICP: 5-15% OA; CGP: 20-50% OVC; PC: 15-25%; PA: 15-20%