Low permeability soils

Introduction

The texture of native soils has a strong influence on the capacity of LID practices to reduce runoff volumes through infiltration. While sandy and silty sand soils have a high capacity to infiltrate water, fine textured soils containing a high percentage of clay may not be suitable for infiltration, or require design adaptations to promote sufficient infiltration.

Post-to-predevelopment water balance matching

The amount of infiltration required on a given site is determined by comparing water balance estimates before and after development. Ideally, the volume of water infiltrated and evapotranspired prior to development would remain the same afterwards. In practice, however, increased impervious cover normally results in lower post development evapotranspiration. Best efforts should be made to match pre-development water balance components. However, in some cases maintaining runoff volumes at predevelopment levels may require that more water is infiltrated after development than under the pre-development condition.

Under natural conditions, sites with fine textured native soils will have lower infiltration volumes (and higher runoff) than those with coarse textured soils. On fine textured soils with very low permeability (hydrologic D type soils), infiltration rates may even approach zero. Under these conditions, the stormwater management approach should focus on runoff prevention and volume reduction through evapotranspiration or water reuse, rather than infiltration.

Infiltration rate measurement methods

A variety of methods are available for measuring and estimating infiltration rates. Selecting an appropriate method will depend on the size and scale of the area over which infiltration rates are being determined. For further information on this topic, click here. (link to wiki page on infiltration measurements)

LID design adaptations on low permeability soils

The rationale for variations in practice design for sites with fine textured soils is based on the relationship between hydraulic head and infiltration. Figure xx shows this relationship for an infiltration trench in Caledon that was filled to the outflow elevation during an intense rain event, and then allowed to naturally infiltrate over a 23 day dry period (ref tech brief). As head decreased, infiltration rates from from 2.5 to 3.8 mm/h during the first two days when trench water levels were above 1.5 m , down to rates of only 1 to 1.5 mm hour after six and half days when water level elevations declined below 1 m.

< Insert figure 8 from tech brief >

It follows, therefore, that infiltration would be enhanced by maintaining a hydraulic head above the point at which infiltration slows to negligible levels. From a design perspective, this means:

1. allowing water to remain within the storage reservoir below the underdrain or outlet continuously, or at least for longer time periods than the typical 48 to 92 hour drawdown time requirements for other stormwater BMPs, and
2. onfiguring the storage to be more vertically oriented to foster higher hydraulic head. As such, the facility would be deeper, with higher ratios of side wall to bottom areas, and a portion of the total storage regarded as effectively permanent.

Another important element of infiltration practice design in the context of fine textured soils relates to the attraction of soil surfaces to water, which are strong in fine textured clays and silty clays and weaker in coarse textured sands or sandy loams. This attraction, referred to as the matric potential, allows water to move up from the groundwater table into the soils. In fine textured soils, this distance can be in excess of one meter. Therefore if the base of the infiltration practice is only one meter above the seasonally high groundwater table, a direct connection between the practice and groundwater may form, bypassing the treatment properties of the soils. It is recommended, therefore that the groundwater table be 1.5 m or lower when practices are installed on fine textured soils.

Performance studies on fine textured soils

A number of field studies of LID practices have been conducted in southern Ontario on fine textured soils. Several of these studies have yielded data that allow for calculation of the facility wide infiltration rate during natural rain events of varying sizes. These are summarized in Figure xx. Infiltration rates on silty clay, clayey silt and sandy silt textured soils had a median value of 3.3 mm/h and a range between 0.3 and 17.8 mm/h. Permeable pavements had lower values in part due to compaction of the subsoils to accommodate traffic loading.

Figure xx: Facility wide infiltration rates for different LID practices installed in the Greater Toronto Area

Stormwater runoff volume reductions varied from site to site, primarily due to factors other than the native soil infiltration rate. For instance, the infiltration trenches and chambers shown in the Figure xx had similar native soil infiltration rates (3.1 to 5.1 mm/h), but runoff reduction values varying from 16 to 90%, chiefly due to site to site differences in the I:P ratio (reference definition), which ranged from 10:1 to 155:1. The configuration of the outflow was also an important consideration. In systems where the outlet is elevated above the native soil, runoff reduction levels tend to be considerably higher than systems with underdrains located at the native soil interface, even if outflow rates from the non-elevated drains are controlled by orifices or flow control valves.

The studies below clearly indicate that significant volume reduction through infiltration is feasible on low permeability soils. If geotechnical investigations indicate that volume loss through infiltration is not possible, or would provide more limited benefits than found in these studies, the project should focus on reducing runoff through vegetative evapotranspiration. See here for a list of options, and their relative potential to reduce runoff through evapotranspiration.

Runoff volume reduction performance for selected monitoring studies of LID practices or sites conducted over a period of a year or more

BMP type	Duration	Site characteristics			Runoff reduction
		Native soil	I/P ratio	Sump depth*
Infiltration trench	Two growing seasons	Silty clay	10:1	<10 cm; flow rate control	80%

Van Seters and Young, 2105 Infiltration trench Two growing seasons Silty clay 10:1 <10 cm; flow rate control 80% Van Seters and Young, 2015 Bioretention Two growing seasons Silty clay 10:1 <10 cm; flow rate control 90% Van Seters and Drake, 2015, Permeable Pavement Five growing seasons Silty clay 1:1 <10 cm; flow rate control 45% STEP, 2017 (ongoing) Bioretention One growing season Silty clay 10:1 <10 cm; flow rate control 83% Van Seters and Graham, 2014 Bioretention Two years Silty clay 11:1 <10 cm; flow rate control 91% Young et al, 2013 Infiltration chamber Two years Sandy silt 20:1 Approx.: 1.2 m 90% Young et al, 2013 Infiltration trench Two years Clayey silt 64:1 2 m 36% Young et al, 2013 Infiltration trench Two years Clayey silt 155:1 2 m 16% SWAMP, 2005 Infiltration trench Two years Clay to clay silt till over silty sand till Appox: 7:1 0.65 m >90% SWAMP, 2002 Infiltration trench Two years Silty sand with clayey silt deposits Approx: 4:1 1 m 89% CVC, 2016 Permeable pavement + bioretention Four years Clayey silt on silt till Approx: 6:1 ? 80% CVC, 2016 bioretention Four years Silty clay Approx.: 10:1 ? 92% CVC, 2016 bioretention Four years Silty clay fill over clay till 30:1 ? 72% CVC, 2016 Permeable pavement Four years Silty clay fill over clay till 1:1 ? ? 1. Represents depth of sump below underdrain or outflow pipe. In some cases, a flow control device was installed to slow outflow rates and enhance infiltration 2. Also known as the Etobicoke Exfiltration system

References:

Young, D., Van Seters, T., Graham, C. 2013 Evaluation of Underground Stormwater Infiltration Systems, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario Van Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario Van Seters T and Graham C, 2014, Performance Evaluation of a Bioretention System, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario SNAP studies of residential rain gardens (need to find reference) Van Seters, T. and Drake, J. Five year evaluation of Permeable Pavements, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario STEP, Performance evaluation of Permeable Pavements – tech brief Calstone report – need to find reference Young D, Van Seters T, Graham, C, 2013, Evaluation of Residential Lot Level Stormwater Practices – tech brief SWAMP, 2005. Performance Assessment of a Perforated Pipe Stormwater Exfiltration system, Toronto, Ontario, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario SWAMP, 2002, Performance Assessment of a Swale Perforated Pipe Stormwater Infiltration System, TRCA, Toronto Ontario + CVC stydies

Low Impact Development. A stormwater management strategy that seeks to mitigate the impacts of increased urban runoff and stormwater pollution by managing it as close to its source as possible. It comprises a set of site design approaches and small scale stormwater management practices that promote the use of natural systems for infiltration and evapotranspiration, and rainwater harvesting.

The portion of water precipitated onto a catchment area, which then flows as surface discharge from the catchment area past a specified point.

Water from rain, snow melt, or irrigation that flows over the land surface.

The slow movement of water into or through a soil or drainage system.

Penetration of water through the ground surface.

Mineral particles which are smaller than 2 mm, and which are free of appreciable quantities of clay and silt. Coarse sand usually designates sand grains with particle size between 0.2 and 0.02 mm.

1. A mineral soil separate consisting of particles less than 0.002 millimeter in equivalent diameter. 2. A soil texture class. 3. (Engineering) A fine-grained soil (more than 50 percent passing the No. 200 Sieve) that has a high plasticity index in relation to the liquid limit. (Unified Soil Classification System).

The accounting of inflow and outflow of water in a system according to the components of the hydrologic cycle.

A hard surface area (e.g., road, parking area or rooftop) that prevents or retards the infiltration of water into the soil.

The quantity of water transpired (given off). Retained in plant tissues, and evaporated from plant tissues and surrounding soil surfaces. Quantitatively it is usually expressed in terms of depth of water per unit area during a specified period. e.g. mm/day

The combined loss of water to the atmosphere from land and water surfaces by evaporation and from plants by transpiration.

refers to the characteristics and functions of a system prior to urban development.

The rate at which stormwater percolates into the subsoil measured in inches per hour.

An underlying bed filled with aggregate or other void-forming fill material that temporarily stores stormwater before infiltrating into the native soil or being conveyed by an underdrain pipe.

A perforated pipe used to assist the draining of soils.

The period between the maximum water level and the minimum level (dry weather or antecedent level).

The upper surface of the zone of saturation, except where the surface is formed by an impermeable body.

The rate at which stormwater percolates into the subsoil measured in inches per hour.

Soil or media particles smaller than sand and larger than clay (3 to 60 m)

The total mass of a pollutant entering a waterbody over a defined time period.

The net amount of something (e.g. chemical, such as phosphorus), calculated as the product of concentration and volume in a given time. Some BMPs significantly reduce loading of pollutants to the environment by reducing volume more so than concentration.

The natural ground material characteristic of or existing by virtue of geographic origin.

The portion of water precipitated onto a catchment area, which then flows as surface discharge from the catchment area past a specified point.

Water from rain, snow melt, or irrigation that flows over the land surface.

Best management practice. State of the art methods or techniques used to manage the quantity and improve the quality of wet weather flow. BMPs include: source, conveyance and end-of-pipe controls.

The natural ground material characteristic of or existing by virtue of geographic origin.

The ratio of the impervious catchment (drainage) area to the pervious (footprint) area of the receiving BMP.

A shallow excavated surface depression containing prepared filter media, mulch, and planted with selected vegetation.

Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program

1. A mineral soil separate consisting of particles less than 0.002 millimeter in equivalent diameter. 2. A soil texture class. 3. (Engineering) A fine-grained soil (more than 50 percent passing the No. 200 Sieve) that has a high plasticity index in relation to the liquid limit. (Unified Soil Classification System).

Credit Valley Conservation

An alternative practice to traditional impervious pavement, prevents the generation of runoff by allowing precipitation falling on the surface to infiltrate through the surface course into an underlying stone reservoir and, where suitable conditions exist, into the native soil.

A shallow excavated surface depression containing prepared filter media, mulch, and planted with selected vegetation.

The downward movement of water through the soil, the downward flow of runoff from the bottom of an infiltration BMP into the soil.

Loss of water from a drainage system as a result of percolation or absorption into the surrounding medium (e.g., the infiltration of water into the native soil through a perforated pipe wall as it is conveyed).

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

A shallow constructed channel, often grass-lined, which is used as an alternative to curb and channel, or as a pretreatment to other measures. Swales are generally characterized by a broad top width to depth ratio and gentle grades.