Difference between revisions of "No regrets"
ChristineLN (talk | contribs) |
ChristineLN (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[File:No ragrets.jpg|300px|thumb| | + | [[File:No ragrets.jpg|300px|thumb|No ragrets: take actions that pay off now and in the future, even if the climate (or spelling) is uncertain (movie scene from We're the Millers, 2013).]] |
[[File:Railway noregrets.jpg|300px|thumb|right|No regrets: implementing measures that deliver benefits today and in the future, regardless of how the climate may change (Blum, 2020)<ref>Blum, A. 2020. LinkedIn post. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/its-time-no-regret-moves-andrew-blum/</ref>.]] | [[File:Railway noregrets.jpg|300px|thumb|right|No regrets: implementing measures that deliver benefits today and in the future, regardless of how the climate may change (Blum, 2020)<ref>Blum, A. 2020. LinkedIn post. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/its-time-no-regret-moves-andrew-blum/</ref>.]] | ||
Revision as of 19:33, 4 September 2025
Low Impact Development (LID) practices are highlighted across several studies as effective strategies for stormwater management that remain beneficial under both current and future climate conditions. Given that climate change projections are highly uncertain, particularly at local scales, LID represents a “no-regrets” option—actions that improve resilience to climate impacts while providing immediate environmental, social, and economic benefits (Heltberg et al., 2009; Huron River Watershed Council, 2013)[2][3]. Planning for climate change requires consideration of uncertainty in both the rate and magnitude of projected impacts. To address this, researchers have emphasized three guiding principles (Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts, 2011; Huron River Watershed Council, 2013)[4][3]:
- Triage: Focusing resources where they have the greatest impact.
- Precautionary principle: Acting even without certainty when risks are high.
- No-regrets strategies: Implementing actions that provide benefits under any climate scenario.
"Faced with uncertainty about future climate change, and given constraints on available resources, communities may choose to pursue no-regrets strategies – actions that are beneficial in addressing current stormwater management needs regardless of whether or how climate may change in the future" (Means, 2010)[5]
No-regrets approaches, often described as proactive adaptive management, rely on risk-based design standards that account for climate uncertainty and promote actions—such as reducing impervious cover—that enhance watershed resilience under any scenario (Huron River Watershed Council, 2013)[3]. Evidence also shows that redevelopment strategies like increasing density and decreasing impervious cover function as effective no-regrets adaptations, reducing pollutant loads in stormwater runoff while addressing broader climate adaptation goals (Pyke et al., 2011)[6]. However, climate change adaptation in infrastructure planning remains complex due to the scale, interconnectedness, and uncertainty of the problem, requiring integrated solutions rather than single strategies (Blanco et al., 2009)[7]. Green infrastructure plays a key role in this risk-based framework by functioning as a buffer against uncertain climate impacts. Rather than offering only direct, measurable benefits, it reduces the risks of extreme weather events such as flooding, heat waves, and storms, helping communities avoid negative outcomes while also providing wider social and environmental benefits (Matthews et al., 2015)[8]. Together, these perspectives underscore why LID should be widely implemented: it supports current stormwater management needs while simultaneously preparing communities for uncertain future climate conditions.
MECP's Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Guidance Manual Draft (2022) presents several adaptation options, including "no regrets":