8,255
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 27:
Line 27: − ==Performance== − Tree canopies intercept and store rainfall, thereby modifying stormwater runoff and reducing demands on urban stormwater infrastructure (Xiao et al., 1998; Xiao et al., 2000; Xiao and McPherson, 2002; Xiao et al., 2006). Canopy interception reduces both the actual runoff volumes, and delays the onset of peak flows (Davey Resource Group, 2008). − − The extent of interception is influenced by a number of factors including tree architecture and it has been estimated that a typical medium-sized canopy tree can intercept as much as 9000 litres of rainfall year. (Crockford and Richardson, 2000). − A study of rainfall interception by street and park trees in Santa Monica, California found that interception rates varied by tree species and size, with broadleaf evergreen trees provided the most rainfall interception (Xiao and McPherson, 2002). Rainfall interception was found to range from 15.3% for a small jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) to 66.5% for a mature brush box (Tristania conferta now known as Lophostemon confertus). Over the city as a whole the trees intercepted 1.6% of annual precipitation and the researchers calculated that the annual value of avoided stormwater treatment and flood control costs associated with this reduced runoff was US$110,890 (US$3.60 per tree). Line 38:
Line 33: − + − + + − − ===Canopy interception=== − *http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/11/1202/pdf − *http://lfs-mlws.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2014/10/an_analytical_model_of_rainfall_interception_by_urban_trees.pdf − *https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/land-surface-vegetation/biophysical-parameters/9162 − *https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999WR900003 − − ==Components== Line 56:
Line 44: − − + − <div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">+ + + − + − <div class="mw-collapsible-content">+ − {{:Trees: List}}+ − </div></div>+ + + − ==Performance and research==
no edit summary
==Overview==
==Overview==
Trees can be incorporated into [[bioretention]] cells with other plant types, or otherwise into their own planting pits.
Trees can be incorporated into [[bioretention]] cells with other plant types, or otherwise into their own planting pits.
==Planning considerations==
==Planning considerations==
==Design==
==Design==
===Species selection===
===Sizing===
[[Trees: List]]
===Planting pit Sizing===
[[Bioretention: Sizing]]
[[Bioretention: Sizing]]
===Inlets===
===Inlets===
Multiple methods for distribution and conveyance of runoff into the system are recommended for redundancy and conservative designs.
Multiple methods for distribution and conveyance of runoff into the system are recommended for redundancy and conservative designs.
*direct infiltration from permeable paving.
*direct infiltration from permeable paving.
See also [[Inlets]] and [[pretreatment]]
See also [[Inlets]] and [[pretreatment]]
===Underdrain===
===Underdrain===
[[Underdrain]]
[[Underdrain]]
==Species selection==
==Performance==
Tree canopies intercept and store rainfall, thereby modifying stormwater runoff and reducing demands on urban stormwater infrastructure (Xiao et al., 1998; Xiao et al., 2000; Xiao and McPherson, 2002; Xiao et al., 2006). Canopy interception reduces both the actual runoff volumes, and delays the onset of peak flows (Davey Resource Group, 2008).
The extent of interception is influenced by a number of factors including tree architecture and it has been estimated that a typical medium-sized canopy tree can intercept as much as 9000 litres of rainfall year. (Crockford and Richardson, 2000).
==Tree species==
A study of rainfall interception by street and park trees in Santa Monica, California found that interception rates varied by tree species and size, with broadleaf evergreen trees provided the most rainfall interception (Xiao and McPherson, 2002). Rainfall interception was found to range from 15.3% for a small jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) to 66.5% for a mature brush box (Tristania conferta now known as Lophostemon confertus). Over the city as a whole the trees intercepted 1.6% of annual precipitation and the researchers calculated that the annual value of avoided stormwater treatment and flood control costs associated with this reduced runoff was US$110,890 (US$3.60 per tree).
===Canopy interception===
*http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/11/1202/pdf
*http://lfs-mlws.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2014/10/an_analytical_model_of_rainfall_interception_by_urban_trees.pdf
*https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/land-surface-vegetation/biophysical-parameters/9162
*https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999WR900003
[[File:TreeTranspiration.png|thumb|Trees suck! (Abstracted from Phyto, by K. Kennen)]]
[[File:TreeTranspiration.png|thumb|Trees suck! (Abstracted from Phyto, by K. Kennen)]]