Difference between revisions of "Site assessment of residential"
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) m (Jenny Hill moved page Site Conditions Residential to Site conditions: Residential: Title styling) |
Kyle menken (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Having a comprehensive understanding of site conditions is critical for [[Screening LID Options]] | Having a comprehensive understanding of site conditions is critical for [[Screening LID Options]] | ||
− | + | == Desktop Analysis of Background Information == | |
− | + | A thorough assessment of background information is critical to understanding site conditions for residential lots or neighborhood. As you begin gathering and reviewing background information, determine any existing infrastructure gaps and planned upgrades, resident concerns, previous community greening efforts, water usage and basement flooding. The following should be considered when conducting a desktop analysis: | |
− | |||
− | A thorough assessment of background information is critical to understanding site conditions for residential lots or neighborhood. As you begin gathering and reviewing | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* Watershed studies, | * Watershed studies, | ||
− | * | + | * Subwatershed studies, |
− | * | + | * Stormwater master plans |
* Sewershed delineation | * Sewershed delineation | ||
− | * Areas | + | * Areas with identified storm sewer capacity issues |
* Area contributing to combined sewer overflows | * Area contributing to combined sewer overflows | ||
* Areas of degraded water quality | * Areas of degraded water quality | ||
Line 20: | Line 15: | ||
* The impact of planned development on existing infrastructure and watershed health | * The impact of planned development on existing infrastructure and watershed health | ||
* Source water protection plans | * Source water protection plans | ||
− | * | + | * Wellhead protection areas (quantity and quality) |
* Surficial Geology | * Surficial Geology | ||
** Soil characterization | ** Soil characterization | ||
** Groundwater levels | ** Groundwater levels | ||
− | + | In addition, be sure to know the relevant local bylaws. Construction some LID features may contravene local regulations. Below are some examples of typical bylaws and their potential impact on LID planning: | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 34: | Line 26: | ||
| | | | ||
− | General Provisions May Include | + | General Provisions May Include: |
| | | | ||
− | Impacts on LID Options | + | Impacts on LID Options: |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | Nuisance weeds and tall grass | + | Nuisance weeds and tall grass |
| | | | ||
Designates tall grass and weeds as a public nuisance | Designates tall grass and weeds as a public nuisance | ||
− | * Defines “tall grass” as grasses over a maximum height (typically 20 | + | * Defines “tall grass” as grasses over a maximum height (typically 20 – 30 cm) |
− | |||
− | |||
* Requires tall grass to be cut to a height not exceeding the maximum | * Requires tall grass to be cut to a height not exceeding the maximum | ||
− | * Requires all nuisance weeds and weed seeds to be removed from a | + | * Requires all nuisance weeds and weed seeds to be removed from a property by the owner. |
− | |||
* The municipality may carry out the work to bring properties into | * The municipality may carry out the work to bring properties into | ||
− | * | + | * Compliance and recovery costs from the land owner |
| | | | ||
− | Vegetated LID practices | + | Vegetated LID practices may be in violation of the relevant bylaw, e.g. landscape naturalization with prairie or ornamental grasses. |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | Property standards | + | Property standards |
| | | | ||
Sets minimum requirements for privately owned properties | Sets minimum requirements for privately owned properties | ||
− | * Restricts low lying areas including those that have been excavated | + | * Restricts low-lying areas, including those that have been excavated and accumulate water, and requires that they be drained, filled and graded so that water drains to a storm sewer or ditch. |
− | + | * Requires that all landscaped areas be cut and maintained in a reasonable condition relative to the neighboring environment | |
− | |||
− | * Requires that all landscaped areas be cut and maintained in a reasonable | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | Can preclude the | + | Can preclude the some LID practices, such as bioretention facilities designed be both low-lying and including ‘shallow’ surface ponding. Such bylaws can also prohibit other BMPS which rely on naturalizing landscapes. |
− | |||
− | and | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | Sewer use | + | Sewer use |
| | | | ||
− | Although generally limited to sanitary sewers, many municipalities now include storm water within this by-law. It generally requires all storm water | + | Although generally limited to sanitary sewers, many municipalities now include storm water within this by-law. It generally requires all storm water be discharged to an approved outlet and regulates the contents of the discharged water. |
− | |||
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | May not permit direct discharge of roof water to the municipal storm sewer system. This | + | May not permit direct discharge of roof water to the municipal storm sewer system. This can include overflow from rainwater harvesting tanks and similar devices. |
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | Standing water | + | Standing water |
| | | | ||
Line 101: | Line 79: | ||
* Often in response to mosquito breeding and West Nile Virus concerns. | * Often in response to mosquito breeding and West Nile Virus concerns. | ||
− | * Accumulation is typically defined | + | * Accumulation is typically defined by a determined period of time (e.g. 48 hours) |
| | | | ||
− | + | Soakaways, subsurface storage facilities, bioretention and bioswales may be prohibited. | |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | Boulevard planting | + | Boulevard planting |
| | | | ||
Line 114: | Line 92: | ||
| | | | ||
− | + | Bio-swales or vegetated swales may be constrained by plant-type and plant-height restrictions along municipal boulevards | |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
− | Roof | + | Roof leader policies (often part of property standards bylaws) |
| | | | ||
Regulates the collection and allowable discharge location of roof drainage | Regulates the collection and allowable discharge location of roof drainage | ||
− | * May specify outlet distance from building foundation | + | * May specify outlet distance from building foundation and may prohibit discharge to storm sewers, impervious surfaces and property boundaries |
− | |||
| | | | ||
− | Progressive roof leader policies can encourage the implementation of rain gardens, soakaways, rain barrels, and other LID practices | + | Progressive roof leader policies can encourage the implementation of rain gardens, soakaways, rain barrels, and other LID practices. |
|} | |} | ||
− | + | After concluding a desktop analysis, visiting the neighbourhood in question for field reconnaissance may be ideal. Be sure to look for: | |
− | + | * Neighbourhood characteristics – general impressions | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | * Neighbourhood characteristics | ||
* General lot characteristics | * General lot characteristics | ||
** % of property coverage by house | ** % of property coverage by house | ||
Line 150: | Line 117: | ||
** % of property covered by alternative landscaping | ** % of property covered by alternative landscaping | ||
** % of property covered by trees | ** % of property covered by trees | ||
− | ** Location and general | + | ** Location and general condition of gardens |
** Distribution and coverage of natural vegetation | ** Distribution and coverage of natural vegetation | ||
** Location of septic systems | ** Location of septic systems | ||
− | ** | + | ** Fencing style and location |
** Prevalence of irrigation systems | ** Prevalence of irrigation systems | ||
− | ** | + | ** Roadside swales |
− | ** % | + | ** % curb |
* Drainage characteristics | * Drainage characteristics | ||
* Rooftop / drainage characteristics | * Rooftop / drainage characteristics | ||
* Best management practices info | * Best management practices info | ||
− | + | ||
+ | Once the analysis is complete, proceed to developing a list of recommended actions. |
Revision as of 17:59, 1 December 2017
Having a comprehensive understanding of site conditions is critical for Screening LID Options
Desktop Analysis of Background Information[edit]
A thorough assessment of background information is critical to understanding site conditions for residential lots or neighborhood. As you begin gathering and reviewing background information, determine any existing infrastructure gaps and planned upgrades, resident concerns, previous community greening efforts, water usage and basement flooding. The following should be considered when conducting a desktop analysis:
- Watershed studies,
- Subwatershed studies,
- Stormwater master plans
- Sewershed delineation
- Areas with identified storm sewer capacity issues
- Area contributing to combined sewer overflows
- Areas of degraded water quality
- Areas prone to flooding (both urban and riverine)
- Water quality targets
- Flow targets
- Infiltration targets
- The impact of planned development on existing infrastructure and watershed health
- Source water protection plans
- Wellhead protection areas (quantity and quality)
- Surficial Geology
- Soil characterization
- Groundwater levels
In addition, be sure to know the relevant local bylaws. Construction some LID features may contravene local regulations. Below are some examples of typical bylaws and their potential impact on LID planning:
Typical Bylaws |
General Provisions May Include: |
Impacts on LID Options: |
Nuisance weeds and tall grass |
Designates tall grass and weeds as a public nuisance
|
Vegetated LID practices may be in violation of the relevant bylaw, e.g. landscape naturalization with prairie or ornamental grasses. |
Property standards |
Sets minimum requirements for privately owned properties
|
Can preclude the some LID practices, such as bioretention facilities designed be both low-lying and including ‘shallow’ surface ponding. Such bylaws can also prohibit other BMPS which rely on naturalizing landscapes. |
Sewer use |
Although generally limited to sanitary sewers, many municipalities now include storm water within this by-law. It generally requires all storm water be discharged to an approved outlet and regulates the contents of the discharged water. |
May not permit direct discharge of roof water to the municipal storm sewer system. This can include overflow from rainwater harvesting tanks and similar devices. |
Standing water |
Prevents accumulation of water on an individual property within any depression
|
Soakaways, subsurface storage facilities, bioretention and bioswales may be prohibited. |
Boulevard planting |
Regulates the type of vegetation that can be planted within the boulevard area |
Bio-swales or vegetated swales may be constrained by plant-type and plant-height restrictions along municipal boulevards |
Roof leader policies (often part of property standards bylaws) |
Regulates the collection and allowable discharge location of roof drainage
|
Progressive roof leader policies can encourage the implementation of rain gardens, soakaways, rain barrels, and other LID practices. |
After concluding a desktop analysis, visiting the neighbourhood in question for field reconnaissance may be ideal. Be sure to look for:
- Neighbourhood characteristics – general impressions
- General lot characteristics
- % of property coverage by house
- Driveway sizes
- Drivway types (% of asphalt, gravel, block pavers, etc.)
- % of property covered by turf
- % of property covered by alternative landscaping
- % of property covered by trees
- Location and general condition of gardens
- Distribution and coverage of natural vegetation
- Location of septic systems
- Fencing style and location
- Prevalence of irrigation systems
- Roadside swales
- % curb
- Drainage characteristics
- Rooftop / drainage characteristics
- Best management practices info
Once the analysis is complete, proceed to developing a list of recommended actions.