Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | <p>While few field studies of the pollutant removal capacity of bioswales are available from cold climate regions like Ontario, it can be assumed that they would perform similar to [[bioretention cells]]. Bioretention provides effective removal for many pollutants as a result of sedimentation, filtering, plant uptake, soil adsorption, and microbial processes. It is important to note that there is a relationship between the water balance and water quality functions. If a bioswale infiltrates and evaporates 100% of the flow from a site, then there is essentially no pollution leaving the site in surface runoff. Furthermore, treatment of infiltrated runoff will continue to occur as it moves through the native soils. </p>
| + | While few field studies of the pollutant removal capacity of bioswales are available from cold climate regions like Ontario, it can be assumed that they would perform similar to [[bioretention cells]]. |
− | <div class="col-md-8">
| + | Bioretention provides effective removal for many pollutants as a result of sedimentation, filtering, plant uptake, soil adsorption, and microbial processes. It is important to note that there is a relationship between the water balance and water quality functions. |
− | <table table class="table table-condensed table-striped">
| + | If a bioswale infiltrates and evaporates 100% of the flow from a site, then there is essentially no pollution leaving the site in surface runoff. Furthermore, treatment of infiltrated runoff will continue to occur as it moves through the native soils. </p> |
− | <tr class=success>
| + | |
− | <th class="text-center">Design</th>
| + | {| class="orangetable" |
− | <th class="text-center">Location</th>
| + | |- |
− | <th class="text-center">Runoff reduction</th>
| + | !Design |
− | </tr>
| + | !Location |
− | <tr>
| + | !Runoff reduction |
− | <td class="text-center">No underdrain</td>
| + | |- |
− | <td class="text-center">Washington</td>
| + | |No underdrain||Washington||>98 % |
− | <td class="text-center">98 %</td>
| + | |- |
− | </tr>
| + | |No underdrain||United Kingdom||>94 % |
− | <tr>
| + | |- |
− | <td class="text-center">No underdrain</td>
| + | |With underdrain||Maryland||46 - 54 % |
− | <td class="text-center">United Kingdom</td>
| + | |- |
− | <td class="text-center">94 %</td>
| + | |colspan=2 <strong>Runoff reduction estimate</strong>||<strong>85 %</strong> |
− | </tr>
| + | |} |
− | <tr>
| |
− | <td class="text-center">With underdrain</td>
| |
− | <td class="text-center">Maryland</td>
| |
− | <td class="text-center">46 - 54 %</td>
| |
− | </tr>
| |
− | <tr>
| |
− | <td colspan=2 class="text-right"><strong>Runoff reduction estimate</strong></td>
| |
− | <td class="text-center"><strong>85 %</strong></td>
| |
− | </tr>
| |
− | </table>
| |
− | </div>
| |
− | <div class="col-md-12">
| |