Difference between revisions of "Bioretention: Filter media"

From LID SWM Planning and Design Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
<tr><td>[[Texture]]</td><td><20 % fines</td><td>Hygrometer</td></tr>
 
<tr><td>[[Texture]]</td><td><20 % fines</td><td>Hygrometer</td></tr>
 
<tr><td>[[Organic matter (OM)]]</td><td>5 - 10%</td><td>ASTM D2974-14, Standard test methods for moisture, ash and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. </td></tr>
 
<tr><td>[[Organic matter (OM)]]</td><td>5 - 10%</td><td>ASTM D2974-14, Standard test methods for moisture, ash and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. </td></tr>
<tr><td>[[Phosphorous]]</td><td>10 - 30 ppm</td><td>'Bray' is most common in Ontario. <br>Alternatives include 'Mehlich I or III', or 'Olsen'.</td></tr>
+
<tr><td>[[Phosphorous]]</td><td>10 - 30 ppm</td><td>'Bray' is most common in Ontario. <br>Alternatives include 'Mehlich I or III', or 'Olsen'. <ref>Sawyer JE, Mallarino AP. Differentiating and Understanding the Mehlich 3, Bray, and Olsen Soil Phosphorus Tests 1. http://www.agronext.iastate.edu/soilfertility/info/mnconf11_22_99.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2017.</ref></td></tr>
 
<tr><td>[[Cationic exchange capacity(CEC)]]</td><td>> 10 meq/100g</td><td>ASTM D7503-10, Standard test method for measuring the exchange complex and cation exchange capacity of inorganic fine grained soils. </td></tr>
 
<tr><td>[[Cationic exchange capacity(CEC)]]</td><td>> 10 meq/100g</td><td>ASTM D7503-10, Standard test method for measuring the exchange complex and cation exchange capacity of inorganic fine grained soils. </td></tr>
 
<tr><td>[[Hydraulic conductivity]]</td><td>> 25 mm/hr <br> <250 mm/hr</td><td>Falling head or constant head KSAT</td></tr>
 
<tr><td>[[Hydraulic conductivity]]</td><td>> 25 mm/hr <br> <250 mm/hr</td><td>Falling head or constant head KSAT</td></tr>

Revision as of 18:49, 1 August 2017

Filter media should be obtained premixed from a vendor and meet all municipal, provincial and federal environmental standards. Mixing of sand, topsoil and compost should be done in a manner that preserves topsoil peds. The mixture should be free of stones, stumps, roots, or other debris larger than 50 mm diameter. Samples of the filter media should be dried, ground and tested to ensure they meet the following specifications:

It is recommended that the mixture comprises:

  • 70-80 % coarse sand
  • 10-15 % topsoil
  • 10-15 % organic soil component

The final blended product should be free from have the following properties:

CharacteristicCriterionRecommended method
Texture<20 % finesHygrometer
Organic matter (OM)5 - 10%ASTM D2974-14, Standard test methods for moisture, ash and organic matter of peat and other organic soils.
Phosphorous10 - 30 ppm'Bray' is most common in Ontario.
Alternatives include 'Mehlich I or III', or 'Olsen'. [1]
Cationic exchange capacity(CEC)> 10 meq/100gASTM D7503-10, Standard test method for measuring the exchange complex and cation exchange capacity of inorganic fine grained soils.
Hydraulic conductivity> 25 mm/hr
<250 mm/hr
Falling head or constant head KSAT

Sand[edit]

Particle size distribution graph for ASTM C33 sand, as described in table
  • Coarse sand for LID construction shall be washed clean and free of toxic materials.
  • The pH of the sand shall be ≤ 7.0.
  • The coarse sand shall have a fineness modulus index between 2.8 and 3.1 according to ASTM C33/C33M, or otherwise meet the gradation below.
Particle size distribution
Sieve Percent passing
9.5 mm 100
4.75 mm (No.4) 95 - 100
2.36 mm (No.8) 80 - 100
1.18 mm (No.16) 50 - 85
0.60 mm (No.30) 25 - 50
0.30 mm (No.50) 5 - 30
0.15 mm (No.100) 0 - 10
0.075 mm (No.200) ≤ 3

Topsoil[edit]

  • Topsoil may be material that was stripped from the project site and stored in stockpiles for re-use, or material imported to the site from a supplier provided the physical and chemical characteristics are within acceptable ranges.
  • Topsoil shall be in compliance with Ontario Regulation 153/04 Record of Site Condition standards for soil quality or as amended through Ontario Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices.
  • Soil laboratory reports shall certify the material to be suitable for re-use on residential, parkland, institutional, industrial, commercial, or community landscapes for the germination of seeds and the support of vegetative growth.

The factors to consider in determining if a topsoil is suitable for use as planting soil for a vegetated stormwater practice, or use in producing a bioretention filter media mixture include the following:

  • Must be friable and capable of sustaining vigorous plant growth;
  • Must be free from toxic material and roots, stones or debris over 50 mm (2") in diameter;
  • Should not have been passed through sieves or screens smaller than 50 mm (2”) to avoid eliminating peds;
  • Should have a Loamy Sand, Sandy Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Loam or Silty Loam soil texture;
  • For use as planting soil for a vegetated stormwater practice , the topsoil must contain a minimum of 5% organic matter by dry weight or be amended so, through addition of an organic soil conditioner;
  • For use in producing bioretention filter media Blend B (water quality treatment priority), the topsoil must contain at least 9%, and not greater than 36% clay-sized particles and at least 2% organic matter by dry weight.
  • Must have a pH of between 6.0 and 8.0;
  • Must have a sodium absorption ratio less than 15;
  • Must have a cationic exchange capacity greater than 10 milliequivalents per 100 grams (meq/100 g).

Specify that 4 litre samples of topsoil, from each source to be drawn upon, be provided to the consultant for visual inspection, along with topsoil quality test results from an accredited soil testing laboratory, or a quality assurance certificate from the supplier.

We recommend a planting soil or filter media depth of 300 mm to support grasses, 600 mm for shrubs and perennials, and 1000 mm for trees.

Organic components[edit]

Compost

Compost is the most widely used organic component. It's use in bioretention facilities is well established and documented. Low-phosphorus composts should always be sought for use in low impact development facilities including bioretention. These are typically created from feedstocks including yard, leaf, and wood waste, and must exclude manures, biosolids, and food scraps.[2]

Compost Specifications

Even low-phosphorous composts are known to export phosphorous over many years. The use of compost is not recommended in watersheds for which phosphorous pollution is a concern. There are alternatives which have undergone field study, each of which has a number of benefits and potential concerns:

Organic soil components
MaterialBenefitsPotential concerns
Coconut coirDoesn't leach PRequires importation
Wood chipDoesn't leach P
Promotes nitrogen removal from water
TBD

Coconut coir http://www.modularwetlands.com/new/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2-Bioretention-Synthesis-2015-DAhearn.pdf Wood derivatives https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/default/files/media/unhsc_bsm_spec_2-28-17_0.pdf

Amendments[edit]

A number of granular amendments have been demonstrated to improve nutrient removal from bioretention discharge water. There are two primary processes involved, precipitation and adsorption. Both mechanisms are ultimately finite, but have been shown in come cases to make significant improvements on the discharged water quality over several years. Typically these type of amendments would comprise 5- 10 % by volume of the filter media mixture.

Soil Amendments
MaterialBenefitsPotential concerns
Biochar-Currently expensive
Energy intensive to produce
Iron filings (ZVI)-Proprietary
Red sandProven phosphorous retentionProprietary
Sorptive mediaTMProven phosphorous retention
Water treatment residualsWaste product reuseProprietary

<panelSuccess>

</panelSuccess>


  1. Sawyer JE, Mallarino AP. Differentiating and Understanding the Mehlich 3, Bray, and Olsen Soil Phosphorus Tests 1. http://www.agronext.iastate.edu/soilfertility/info/mnconf11_22_99.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2017.
  2. Hurley S, Shrestha P, Cording A. Nutrient Leaching from Compost: Implications for Bioretention and Other Green Stormwater Infrastructure. J Sustain Water Built Environ. 2017;3(3):4017006. doi:10.1061/JSWBAY.0000821.