| Line 89: |
Line 89: |
| | *The property owner can specify in construction tenders or contracts to retain a certain percentage of the total value of the work done for a period of 12 months from the date of final completion. | | *The property owner can specify in construction tenders or contracts to retain a certain percentage of the total value of the work done for a period of 12 months from the date of final completion. |
| | **In such cases, construction contracts should specifically require that thorough inspection and testing of the BMPs be completed to the satisfaction of the property owner or their project manager, design consultants and construction contractors as a condition of Assumption, contract termination and release of the holdback amount.<br> | | **In such cases, construction contracts should specifically require that thorough inspection and testing of the BMPs be completed to the satisfaction of the property owner or their project manager, design consultants and construction contractors as a condition of Assumption, contract termination and release of the holdback amount.<br> |
| | + | <br> |
| | | | |
| | ===Routine Operation Inspections=== | | ===Routine Operation Inspections=== |
| − | Routine Operation inspections should be the responsibility of the property owner or their contractors. At a minimum, Routine Operation inspections should occur annually, but twice annually (in spring and fall seasons) is preferable for vegetated BMPs. More frequent inspections may be warranted for highly visible BMPs, those receiving drainage from high traffic areas (vehicle or pedestrian), or those designed with larger than recommended impervious drainage area to pervious BMP footprint area ratio (i.e., I:P ratio). Feedback from inspections should be used to immediately address routine maintenance needs, schedule structural repairs or further investigations into potential problems with BMP function and to adjust the preset schedule of routine maintenance tasks to optimize the use of program resources. | + | Routine Operation inspections should be the responsibility of the property owner or their contractors. At a minimum, Routine Operation inspections should occur annually, but twice annually (in spring and fall seasons) is preferable for vegetated BMPs. More frequent inspections may be warranted for highly visible BMPs, those receiving drainage from high traffic areas (vehicle or pedestrian), or those designed with larger than recommended impervious drainage area to pervious BMP footprint area ratio (i.e., I:P ratio). Feedback from inspections should be used to immediately address routine maintenance needs, schedule structural repairs or further investigations into potential problems with BMP function and to adjust the preset schedule of routine maintenance tasks to optimize the use of program resources. <br> |
| | + | <br> |
| | | | |
| | ===Verification Inspections=== | | ===Verification Inspections=== |
| Line 105: |
Line 107: |
| | *More frequent Performance Verification inspections may be warranted for BMPs draining to highly sensitive receiving waters or habitat of species at risk. Testing of functional performance (e.g., surface infiltration rate testing, natural or simulated storm event testing, continuous monitoring) is done in addition to Maintenance Verification inspection indicators (i.e., visual indicators and sediment accumulation testing). | | *More frequent Performance Verification inspections may be warranted for BMPs draining to highly sensitive receiving waters or habitat of species at risk. Testing of functional performance (e.g., surface infiltration rate testing, natural or simulated storm event testing, continuous monitoring) is done in addition to Maintenance Verification inspection indicators (i.e., visual indicators and sediment accumulation testing). |
| | | | |
| − | Feedback from inspections should be used to schedule repair or rehabilitation tasks, further investigations into observed problems with BMP function (see Forensic Inspection and Testing section below), or initiate compliance enforcement actions if warranted. | + | Feedback from inspections should be used to schedule repair or rehabilitation tasks, further investigations into observed problems with BMP function (see Forensic Inspection and Testing section below), or initiate compliance enforcement actions if warranted.<br> |
| | + | <br> |
| | | | |
| | ===Forensic Inspection and Testing (FIT)=== | | ===Forensic Inspection and Testing (FIT)=== |
| Line 150: |
Line 153: |
| | {{#widget:YouTube|id=U0b6g-0K1oM}} | | {{#widget:YouTube|id=U0b6g-0K1oM}} |
| | | | |
| − | ==Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair== | + | ==[[Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair]]== |
| | Types of maintenance activities range from routine maintenance tasks like removal of accumulated trash, debris, and small amounts of sediment, weeding and trimming vegetation to more costly and complex structural repairs and rehabilitation of clogged or damaged components. To read more about these activities and who is is responsible for them visit the page here: | | Types of maintenance activities range from routine maintenance tasks like removal of accumulated trash, debris, and small amounts of sediment, weeding and trimming vegetation to more costly and complex structural repairs and rehabilitation of clogged or damaged components. To read more about these activities and who is is responsible for them visit the page here: |
| | | | |
| | [[Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair]] | | [[Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair]] |
| | | | |
| − | ==Key Design and Plan Review Considerations== | + | ==[[Key Design and Plan Review Considerations]]== |
| | Designing LID BMPs with ease of inspection and maintenance in mind is critical to the affordability of municipal stormwater infrastructure asset management programs and must be considered early on in the plan review stage. Learn more about these common considerations including, providing runoff pretreatment, designing low maintenance conveyance systems, inspection & maintenance of associated features, and inclusion of planting and sediment removal plans. | | Designing LID BMPs with ease of inspection and maintenance in mind is critical to the affordability of municipal stormwater infrastructure asset management programs and must be considered early on in the plan review stage. Learn more about these common considerations including, providing runoff pretreatment, designing low maintenance conveyance systems, inspection & maintenance of associated features, and inclusion of planting and sediment removal plans. |
| | | | |
| Line 162: |
Line 165: |
| | [[Key Design and Plan Review Considerations]] | | [[Key Design and Plan Review Considerations]] |
| | | | |
| − | ==Inspection and Testing Framework== | + | ==[[Testing|Inspection and Testing Framework]]== |
| | Here you will find the various types of testing to ensure your LID installations are operating at optimal levels and each test is used for specific BMPs. To learn about the associated equipment and training required to conduct tests such as soil characterization testing, sediment accumulation testing, surface infiltration rate testing, natural or simulated storm event testing, and [[green roofs|green roof]] irrigation and leak detection testing, please visit the link below: | | Here you will find the various types of testing to ensure your LID installations are operating at optimal levels and each test is used for specific BMPs. To learn about the associated equipment and training required to conduct tests such as soil characterization testing, sediment accumulation testing, surface infiltration rate testing, natural or simulated storm event testing, and [[green roofs|green roof]] irrigation and leak detection testing, please visit the link below: |
| | | | |