| Line 51: |
Line 51: |
| | Constructed wetlands differ based on how water travels through the system<ref>Grant, N., M. Moodie, and C. Weedon. 2000. Sewage Treatment Solutions. p. 35–67. In Sewage Solutions: Answering the Call of Nature. Centre for Alternative Technology Publications.</ref><ref name="EPA">United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. A handbook of constructed wetlands: A guide to creating wetlands for agricultural wastewater, domestic wastewater, coal mine drainage and stormwater.</ref><ref name="JW">Jacques Whitford Consultants, 2008. Constructed and engineered wetlands. p. 1-21</ref>: | | Constructed wetlands differ based on how water travels through the system<ref>Grant, N., M. Moodie, and C. Weedon. 2000. Sewage Treatment Solutions. p. 35–67. In Sewage Solutions: Answering the Call of Nature. Centre for Alternative Technology Publications.</ref><ref name="EPA">United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. A handbook of constructed wetlands: A guide to creating wetlands for agricultural wastewater, domestic wastewater, coal mine drainage and stormwater.</ref><ref name="JW">Jacques Whitford Consultants, 2008. Constructed and engineered wetlands. p. 1-21</ref>: |
| | *Free-water surface flow wetlands have water exposed on the surface, which provides excellent water quality treatment but may pose health and safety risks. Free-water surface flow wetlands are most commonly employed for stormwater treatment and are similar to [[SWM ponds]] in function and design. However, ponds and wetlands differ by the extent to which shallow zones for wetland [[plants]] are incorporated. A facility is normally characterized as a wet pond if shallow zones (<0.5 m deep) comprise less than 20% of its surface area, while a facility is normally characterized as a wetland if shallow zones (<0.5 m deep) make up more than 70 % of its volume. Unlike SWM ponds and constructed wetlands, [[Dry ponds|dry ponds]] are designed to temporarily store stormwater runoff and completely drain out between storm events and focus more on flood attenuation than treatment. | | *Free-water surface flow wetlands have water exposed on the surface, which provides excellent water quality treatment but may pose health and safety risks. Free-water surface flow wetlands are most commonly employed for stormwater treatment and are similar to [[SWM ponds]] in function and design. However, ponds and wetlands differ by the extent to which shallow zones for wetland [[plants]] are incorporated. A facility is normally characterized as a wet pond if shallow zones (<0.5 m deep) comprise less than 20% of its surface area, while a facility is normally characterized as a wetland if shallow zones (<0.5 m deep) make up more than 70 % of its volume. Unlike SWM ponds and constructed wetlands, [[Dry ponds|dry ponds]] are designed to temporarily store stormwater runoff and completely drain out between storm events and focus more on flood attenuation than treatment. |
| | + | *Sub surface flow systems provide generally lower health and safety risks and are sometimes employed to handle stormwater in combination with another wastewater stream. In horizontal sub-surface flow wetlands, water flows horizontally through a media bed, while in vertical sub-surface flow wetlands, water is introduced at the surface and percolates vertically through the media. |
| | | | |
| | {|class="wikitable" | | {|class="wikitable" |
| | + | |+ Types of Constructed Wetland<ref>Grant, N., M. Moodie, and C. Weedon. 2000. Sewage Treatment Solutions. p. 35–67. In Sewage Solutions: Answering the Call of Nature. Centre for Alternative Technology Publications.</ref><ref name="EPA">United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. A handbook of constructed wetlands: A guide to creating wetlands for agricultural wastewater, domestic wastewater, coal mine drainage and stormwater.</ref><ref name="JW">Jacques Whitford Consultants, 2008. Constructed and engineered wetlands. p. 1-21</ref> |
| | |- | | |- |
| | !Free-water surface flow | | !Free-water surface flow |
| | + | !Horizontal sub-surface flow |
| | + | !Vertical sub-surface flow |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |[[File:Schematic of the Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland.jpg|frameless|upright=1.5]] | | |[[File:Schematic of the Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland.jpg|frameless|upright=1.5]] |
| | + | |[[File:Tilley et al 2014 Schematic of the Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland.jpg|frameless|upright=1.5]] |
| | + | |[[File:Tilley et al 2014 Schematic of the Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland.jpg|frameless|upright=1.5]] |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros''' | | |style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros''' |
| Line 64: |
Line 70: |
| | *Can be beautiful | | *Can be beautiful |
| | *Sludge removal infrequent | | *Sludge removal infrequent |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons'''
| |
| − | *Requires larger land area
| |
| − | *Sludge removal may be more difficult
| |
| − | *Open water may generate more health and safety concerns.
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | *Sub surface flow systems provide generally lower health and safety risks and are sometimes employed to handle stormwater in combination with another wastewater stream. In horizontal sub-surface flow wetlands, water flows horizontally through a media bed, while in vertical sub-surface flow wetlands, water is introduced at the surface and percolates vertically through the media.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {|class="wikitable"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | !Horizontal sub-surface flow
| |
| − | !Vertical sub-surface flow
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |[[File:Tilley et al 2014 Schematic of the Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland.jpg|frameless|upright=1.5]]
| |
| − | |[[File:Tilley et al 2014 Schematic of the Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland.jpg|frameless|upright=1.5]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| | |style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros''' | | |style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros''' |
| | *Well established technology | | *Well established technology |
| Line 98: |
Line 88: |
| | *Will function prior to establishment of vegetation | | *Will function prior to establishment of vegetation |
| | |- | | |- |
| | + | |style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons''' |
| | + | *Requires larger land area |
| | + | *Sludge removal may be more difficult |
| | + | *Open water may generate more health and safety concerns. |
| | |style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons''' | | |style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons''' |
| | *Requires more land | | *Requires more land |