Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Bioretention: Sizing
(view source)
Revision as of 17:14, 20 May 2020
No change in size
,
4 years ago
→Drainage time (3D)Woods Ballard, B., S. Wilson, H. Udale-Clarke, S. Illman, T. Scott, R. Ahsley, and R. Kellagher. 2016. The SuDS Manual. 5th ed. CIRIA, London.
Line 169:
Line 169:
Typically, this is only worth exploring over sandy textured native subsoils with rapid infiltration.
Typically, this is only worth exploring over sandy textured native subsoils with rapid infiltration.
−
Note that narrow, linear bioretention features (or [[bioswales]]) drain faster than round or blocky footprint geometries
.
+
The drainage time calculator noted above can be used to calculate drainage time assuming three dimensional drainage as well
.
*Begin the drainage time calculation by dividing the area of the practice (''A<sub>p</sub>'') by the perimeter (''x'')
*Begin the drainage time calculation by dividing the area of the practice (''A<sub>p</sub>'') by the perimeter (''x'')
Line 181:
Line 181:
*''x'' is the perimeter of the practice (m), and
*''x'' is the perimeter of the practice (m), and
*''d<sub>r</sub>'' is the depth of the storage reservoir (m).}}
*''d<sub>r</sub>'' is the depth of the storage reservoir (m).}}
−
The drainage time calculator noted above can be used to calculate drainage time assuming three dimensional drainage as well
.
+
+
Note that narrow, linear bioretention features (or [[bioswales]]) drain faster than round or blocky footprint geometries
.
===Groundwater mounding===
===Groundwater mounding===
Dean Young
Bots
,
Bureaucrats
, developer,
Interface administrators
,
Suppressors
,
Administrators
,
Widget editors
2,683
edits
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
Variants
Views
Read
View source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Home
Table of contents
All pages
Recent changes
Responses to comments
Tools
Special pages
Printable version