Difference between revisions of "Stormwater Tree Trenches"

From LID SWM Planning and Design Guide
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(26 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
==Overview==
 
==Overview==
 
Trees can be incorporated into [[bioretention]] cells with other plant types, or otherwise into their own planting pits.  
 
Trees can be incorporated into [[bioretention]] cells with other plant types, or otherwise into their own planting pits.  
==Performance==
+
 
Tree canopies intercept and store rainfall, thereby modifying stormwater runoff and reducing demands on urban stormwater infrastructure (Xiao et al., 1998; Xiao et al., 2000; Xiao and McPherson, 2002; Xiao et al., 2006). Canopy interception reduces both the actual runoff volumes, and delays the onset of peak flows (Davey Resource Group, 2008). The extent of interception is influenced by a number of factors including tree architecture and it has been estimated that a typical medium-sized canopy tree can intercept as much as 9000 litres of rainfall year. (Crockford and Richardson, 2000). A study of rainfall interception by street and park trees in Santa Monica, California found that interception rates varied by tree species and size, with broadleaf evergreen trees provided the most rainfall interception (Xiao and McPherson, 2002). Rainfall interception was found to range from 15.3% for a small jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) to 66.5% for a mature brush box (Tristania conferta now known as Lophostemon confertus). Over the city as a whole the trees intercepted 1.6% of annual precipitation and the researchers calculated that the annual value of avoided stormwater treatment and flood control costs associated with this reduced runoff was US$110,890 (US$3.60 per tree).
 
  
 
==Planning considerations==
 
==Planning considerations==
A commonly held view is that a tree's root system will be similar to it's visible crown. For many trees, this is not the case, as roots will more often spread mush more widely, but to a shallower depth <ref>Crow, P. (2005). The Influence of Soils and Species on Tree Root Depth. Edinburgh. Retrieved from https://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/FCIN078.pdf/$FILE/FCIN078.pdf</ref>.
+
A commonly held view is that a tree's root system will be similar to it's visible crown. For many trees, this is not the case, as roots will more often spread much more widely, but to a shallower depth <ref>Crow, P. (2005). The Influence of Soils and Species on Tree Root Depth. Edinburgh. Retrieved from https://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/FCIN078.pdf/$FILE/FCIN078.pdf</ref>. For more detailed information on planning (site) considerations  see [[Bioretention]]
 +
 
 +
===Planting in slopes===
 +
Smooth slopes should be amended into localised terraces by the Landscape Architect when planting large trees into slopes > 5 %. <ref>Wilkus A., 'Slope Style', Landscape Architecture Magazine, April 2018, accessed 21 December 2018, https://landscapearchitecturemagazine.org/2018/04/24/slope-style/</ref>
  
 
==Design==
 
==Design==
 +
There are many design configuration options for including trees into stormwater management plans.
  
 +
==Soil cells==
 +
These are (usually plastic) supporting structures placed around the trees and beneath adjacent paved areas. They prevent compaction to the roots of the tree and prevent root damage to the paving. They are sometimes configured to receive stormwater and to enclose ponded water which can then infiltrate the soil surrounding the tree.
 +
Things to consider in design:
 +
*If the system is unlined it is hydraulically equivalent to a [[bioretention]] cell and provides similar water quality benefits. 
 +
*If the system is lined and underdrained it is hydraulically similar to a large [[stormwater planter]]. Depending on the design detail it may retain significant stormwater within the planting soil volume and will provide water quality benefits. 
  
===Canopy interception===
+
===Species selection===
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/11/1202/pdf
+
[[Trees: List]]
http://lfs-mlws.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2014/10/an_analytical_model_of_rainfall_interception_by_urban_trees.pdf
+
===Planting pit sizing===
https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/land-surface-vegetation/biophysical-parameters/9162
+
[[Bioretention: Sizing]]
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999WR900003
 
  
 
==Components==
 
 
===Inlets===
 
===Inlets===
 
Multiple methods for distribution and conveyance of runoff into the system are recommended for redundancy and conservative designs.  
 
Multiple methods for distribution and conveyance of runoff into the system are recommended for redundancy and conservative designs.  
 
Combinations may be made of:
 
Combinations may be made of:
 
*tree well flow,  
 
*tree well flow,  
*catch basins and distribution pipes, and  
+
*catchbasins and distribution pipes, and  
 
*direct infiltration from permeable paving.
 
*direct infiltration from permeable paving.
See also [[Inlets]] and [[pretreatment]]]
+
See also [[Inlets]] and [[pretreatment]]
  
 
===Underdrain===
 
===Underdrain===
 
[[Underdrain]]
 
[[Underdrain]]
  
==Species selection==
+
==Performance==
<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed">
+
===Interception===
 +
Tree canopies intercept and store rainfall, thereby modifying stormwater runoff and reducing demands on urban stormwater infrastructure (Xiao et al., 1998; Xiao et al., 2000; Xiao and McPherson, 2002; Xiao et al., 2006). Canopy interception reduces both the actual runoff volumes, and delays the onset of peak flows (Davey Resource Group, 2008).
  
==Tree species==
+
The extent of interception is influenced by a number of factors including tree architecture and it has been estimated that a typical medium-sized canopy tree can intercept as much as 9000 litres of rainfall year. (Crockford and Richardson, 2000).
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
 
{{:Trees: List}}
 
</div></div>
 
  
==Performance and research==
+
A study of rainfall interception by street and park trees in Santa Monica, California found that interception rates varied by tree species and size, with broadleaf evergreen trees provided the most rainfall interception (Xiao and McPherson, 2002). Rainfall interception was found to range from 15.3% for a small jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) to 66.5% for a mature brush box (Tristania conferta now known as Lophostemon confertus). Over the city as a whole the trees intercepted 1.6% of annual precipitation and the researchers calculated that the annual value of avoided stormwater treatment and flood control costs associated with this reduced runoff was US$110,890 (US$3.60 per tree).
 +
 
 +
*http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/11/1202/pdf
 +
*http://lfs-mlws.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2014/10/an_analytical_model_of_rainfall_interception_by_urban_trees.pdf
 +
*https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/land-surface-vegetation/biophysical-parameters/9162
 +
*https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/1999WR900003
 +
 
 +
===Transpiration===
 
[[File:TreeTranspiration.png|thumb|Trees suck! (Abstracted from Phyto, by K. Kennen)]]
 
[[File:TreeTranspiration.png|thumb|Trees suck! (Abstracted from Phyto, by K. Kennen)]]
  
Line 69: Line 79:
 
*http://www.itreetools.org/eco/international.php
 
*http://www.itreetools.org/eco/international.php
 
*http://treesandstormwater.org/
 
*http://treesandstormwater.org/
 +
*http://cvc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/CaseStudy_CPW_Final.pdf
 +
*https://cvc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/TechReport_CPW_Final.pdf
  
 
==Galleries==
 
==Galleries==
Line 80: Line 92:
 
{{float right|{{#widget:YouTube|id=Un2yBgIAxYs}}}}
 
{{float right|{{#widget:YouTube|id=Un2yBgIAxYs}}}}
 
*http://gievidencebase.botanicgardens.sa.gov.au/contents/7-water-management#Canopy-Interception
 
*http://gievidencebase.botanicgardens.sa.gov.au/contents/7-water-management#Canopy-Interception
 +
*[http://www.jamesurban.net/specifications standard details and specifications from James Urban]
 +
 
{{:Disclaimer}}
 
{{:Disclaimer}}
 
*[http://cupolex.ca/ Cupolex]
 
*[http://cupolex.ca/ Cupolex]
Line 85: Line 99:
 
*[http://www.conteches.com/Products/Stormwater-Management/Biofiltration-Bioretention/Filterra Filterra]
 
*[http://www.conteches.com/Products/Stormwater-Management/Biofiltration-Bioretention/Filterra Filterra]
 
*[http://www.greenblue.com/na/ GreenBlue]
 
*[http://www.greenblue.com/na/ GreenBlue]
 +
*[http://http://www.storm-tree.com/index Storm-Tree]
 
*[http://citygreen.com/products/stratacell/ Stratacell]
 
*[http://citygreen.com/products/stratacell/ Stratacell]
 +
 
----
 
----
 
[[Category:Green infrastructure]]
 
[[Category:Green infrastructure]]

Revision as of 19:46, 19 November 2019

Soil cellsSoil cellsBioretention: Filter mediaChoking layerReservoir gravelReservoir gravelReservoir gravelForebaysForebaysForebaysForebaysSlotted drainDepressed drainTreesTreesPerennials: ListPerennials: ListPerennials: ListOverflowOverflowUnderdrain
This is an image map of an extended tree pit, clicking on components will load the appropriate article.

Overview[edit]

Trees can be incorporated into bioretention cells with other plant types, or otherwise into their own planting pits.


Planning considerations[edit]

A commonly held view is that a tree's root system will be similar to it's visible crown. For many trees, this is not the case, as roots will more often spread much more widely, but to a shallower depth [1]. For more detailed information on planning (site) considerations see Bioretention

Planting in slopes[edit]

Smooth slopes should be amended into localised terraces by the Landscape Architect when planting large trees into slopes > 5 %. [2]

Design[edit]

There are many design configuration options for including trees into stormwater management plans.

Soil cells[edit]

These are (usually plastic) supporting structures placed around the trees and beneath adjacent paved areas. They prevent compaction to the roots of the tree and prevent root damage to the paving. They are sometimes configured to receive stormwater and to enclose ponded water which can then infiltrate the soil surrounding the tree. Things to consider in design:

  • If the system is unlined it is hydraulically equivalent to a bioretention cell and provides similar water quality benefits.
  • If the system is lined and underdrained it is hydraulically similar to a large stormwater planter. Depending on the design detail it may retain significant stormwater within the planting soil volume and will provide water quality benefits.

Species selection[edit]

Trees: List

Planting pit sizing[edit]

Bioretention: Sizing

Inlets[edit]

Multiple methods for distribution and conveyance of runoff into the system are recommended for redundancy and conservative designs. Combinations may be made of:

  • tree well flow,
  • catchbasins and distribution pipes, and
  • direct infiltration from permeable paving.

See also Inlets and pretreatment

Underdrain[edit]

Underdrain

Performance[edit]

Interception[edit]

Tree canopies intercept and store rainfall, thereby modifying stormwater runoff and reducing demands on urban stormwater infrastructure (Xiao et al., 1998; Xiao et al., 2000; Xiao and McPherson, 2002; Xiao et al., 2006). Canopy interception reduces both the actual runoff volumes, and delays the onset of peak flows (Davey Resource Group, 2008).

The extent of interception is influenced by a number of factors including tree architecture and it has been estimated that a typical medium-sized canopy tree can intercept as much as 9000 litres of rainfall year. (Crockford and Richardson, 2000).

A study of rainfall interception by street and park trees in Santa Monica, California found that interception rates varied by tree species and size, with broadleaf evergreen trees provided the most rainfall interception (Xiao and McPherson, 2002). Rainfall interception was found to range from 15.3% for a small jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) to 66.5% for a mature brush box (Tristania conferta now known as Lophostemon confertus). Over the city as a whole the trees intercepted 1.6% of annual precipitation and the researchers calculated that the annual value of avoided stormwater treatment and flood control costs associated with this reduced runoff was US$110,890 (US$3.60 per tree).

Transpiration[edit]

Trees suck! (Abstracted from Phyto, by K. Kennen)

Galleries[edit]

Open tree pits[edit]

Soil cells[edit]

External links[edit]

In our effort to make this guide as functional as possible, we have decided to include proprietary systems and links to manufacturers websites.
Inclusion of such links does not constitute endorsement by the Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program.
Lists are ordered alphabetically; link updates are welcomed using the form below.


  1. Crow, P. (2005). The Influence of Soils and Species on Tree Root Depth. Edinburgh. Retrieved from https://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/FCIN078.pdf/$FILE/FCIN078.pdf
  2. Wilkus A., 'Slope Style', Landscape Architecture Magazine, April 2018, accessed 21 December 2018, https://landscapearchitecturemagazine.org/2018/04/24/slope-style/