Talk:Infiltration

From LID SWM Planning and Design Guide
Revision as of 21:37, 18 March 2018 by Jenny Hill (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The material pasted here has been retained for archival purposes only.

Infiltration tests must be undertaken at the location, depth and with a head of water that replicates the proposed design.

Suggested safety factors to be applied to measured percolation rate when designing infiltration facilities
Catchment area Consequence of failure
No damage or inconvenience Minor damage or inconvenience to external structures (e.g. ponding in parking lot) Significant damage to buildings or infrastructure (e.g. flooding damage)
<100 m2 1.5 2 10
100 - 1000 m2 1.5 3 10

Example[edit]

Where the mean infiltration rate measured at the proposed bottom elevation of the BMP is 30 mm/hr, and the mean infiltration rate measured in an underlying soil horizon within 1.5 m of the bottom is 12 mm/h:

From the table the SCF is 3.5, and the design infiltration rate can be calculated:

Infiltration Testing[edit]

  • Double ring infiltrometer
  • Single Ring Infiltrometer
  • Constant-head well permeameter
  • Falling-head well permeameter
  • Cased-borehole
  • Falling Head Test
  • Constant Head Test
  • Basin Flooding Test

The preferred testing period is during April and May. If testing is conducted between June 1 and December 1, the soil should be soaked for 24 hours prior, to simulate field saturated conditions.[1]

  • If uniform soil texture is observed in the proposed location, at least three percolation test holes should be prepared. If the soil texture changes within the area, make at least two test holes in each soil texture. All test holes should be uniformly spaced across the proposed area.
  • Test holes should be between 150 - 200 mm in diameter, and penetrate to the depth of the proposed BMP. Observations should be made on the extracted soil and variations recorded.
  • The lowest 300 mm and the bottom of the test pit should be scarified, and the loose material removed.
  • A mesh bag containing about 1 L of pea gravel may be lowered into the pit, to prevent scouring of the base. Attaching a line to the bag allows it to be removed and reused.
  • Carefully pour 6 L of clean water into the base of the pit. A hose is recommended to prevent washing out or erosion of the sides.
  • In sandy soils, where half the depth of water percolates within 30 minutes. Otherwise, calculate the infiltration rate

The infiltration rate used to design an infiltration BMP (e.g.infiltration trench or bioretention) must incorporate a safety correction factor that compensates for potential reductions in soil permeability.

These may be due to:

  • compaction or smearing during construction,
  • gradual accumulation of fine sediments over the lifespan of the BMP, and
  • uncertainty in measured values when less permeable soil horizons exist within 1.5 metres below the proposed bottom elevation of the BMP.

The measured infiltration rate (q, mm/hr) at the proposed bottom elevation of the BMP must be divided by a safety correction factor (SCF) to calculate the infiltration coefficient. To select a safety correction factor, calculate the ratio of the mean (geometric) measured infiltration rate at the proposed bottom elevation of the BMP to the rate in the least permeable soil horizon within 1.5 metres below the bottom of the BMP. Based on this ratio, a safety correction factor is selected from the Table below. Where the soil horizon is continuous within 1.5 metres below the proposed bottom of the BMP, the mean infiltration rate measured at the bottom elevation of the BMP should be divided by a safety correction factor of 2.5 to calculate the design infiltration rate.

Safety correction factors for calculating design infiltration rates[2]
Ratio of mean measured infiltration rates Safety Correction Factor
≤ 1 2.5
1.1 to 4.0 3.5
4.1 to 8.0 4.5
8.1 to 16.0 6.5
16.1 or greater 8.5


Where the mean infiltration rate measured at the proposed bottom elevation of the BMP is 30 mm/h, and the mean infiltration rate measured in an underlying soil horizon within 1.5 metres of the bottom is 12 mm/h:

From the table the SCF is 3.5, and the design infiltration rate can be calculated:


Minnesota say 2 [3] Pennsylvania say 3 [4] CIRIA say 2-3 for low risk sites [5]

  1. http://www.extension.umn.edu/environment/housing-technology/moisture-management/how-to-run-a-percolation-test/index.html
  2. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2004. Conservation Practice Standards. Site Evaluation for Stormwater Infiltration (1002). Madison, WI.
  3. Design criteria for infiltration. (2018, February 14). Minnesota Stormwater Manual, . Retrieved 00:16, March 14, 2018 from https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Design_criteria_for_infiltration&oldid=35583.
  4. CRC for Water Sensitive Cities. (2015). Adoption Guidelines for Stormwater Biofiltration Systems: Appendix C - Guidelines for filter media in stormwater biofiltration systems.
  5. Ballard, B. W., Wilson, S., Udale-Clarke, H., Illman, S., Scott, T., Ashley, R., & Kellagher, R. (2015). The SuDS Manual. London.