Open main menu

LID SWM Planning and Design Guide β

Bioretention

This is alt text
These bioretention cells at Edwards Gardens in Toronto receive inflow from hydraulically connected permeable paving parking stalls
Bioretention cell capturing and treating runoff from an adjacent parking lot at the Kortright Centre, Vaughan.

This article is about planted installations designed to capture and infiltrate some or all of the stormwater received.
For simple systems, without underdrains or storage reservoir (typically found n residential settings), see Rain gardens.
For linear systems, which convey flow, but are otherwise similar to bioretention see Bioswales.
For planted systems that do not infiltrate any water, see Stormwater planters.

Contents

Overview

Bioretention systems may be the most well recognized form of low impact development (LID). They can fit into any style of landscape and encompass all mechanisms of action: infiltration, filtration, attenuation and evapotranspiration.

Bioretention is an ideal technology for:

  • Fitting functional vegetation into urban landscapes
  • Treating runoff collected from nearby impervious surfaces

The fundamental components of a bioretention cell are:

Additional components may include:

  • An underdrain to redistribute or remove excess water
  • Soil additives intended to enhance nutrient and related water quality pollutant removal

Planning considerations

Note Site Considerations from the Bioretention Fact Sheet [1] in the 2010 CVC/TRCA LID Stormwater Management Planning Design are detailed below and within links included

Infiltration

Some form of stormwater landscaping (bioretention) can be fitted into most spaces. Although there are some constraints to infiltrating water, it is preferable to do so where possible. Designing bioretention without an underdrain is highly desirable wherever the soils permit infiltration at a rate which is great enough to empty the facility between storm events. Volume reduction is achieved primarily through infiltration to the underlying soils, with some evapotranspiration. As there is no outflow from this BMP under normal operating conditions, it is particularly useful in areas where nutrient management is a concern to the watershed.

Bioretention with an underdrain is a popular choice in areas with 'tighter' soils where infiltration rates are ≤ 15 mm/hr. Including an perforated pipe in the reservoir aggregate layer helps to empty the facility between storm events, which is particularly useful in areas with low permeability soils. The drain discharges to a downstream point, which could be an underground infiltration trench or chamber facility. Volume reduction is gained through infiltration and evapotranspiration. By raising the outlet of the discharge pipe the bottom portion of the BMP can only drain through infiltration. This creates a fluctuating anaerobic/aerobic environment which promotes denitrification. Increasing the period of storage has benefits for promoting infiltration, but also improves water quality for catchments impacted with nitrates. A complimentary technique is to use fresh wood mulch, which also fosters denitrifying biological processes.

Where infiltration is entirely impossible, but the design calls for planted landscaping, try a stormwater planter instead.

Space

  • For optimal performance bioretention facilities should receive runoff from between 5 to 20 times their own surface area.
  • In the conceptual design stage it is recommended to set aside approximately 10 - 20 % of a catchment's total area for bioretention facility placement.
  • Bioretention cells work best when distributed, so that no one facility receives runoff from more than 0.8 Ha.
Although, there is a trade off to be considered regarding distributed collection and treatment against ease of maintenance.
  • Bioretention can be almost any shape, from very curving, soft edges with variable depth, to angular, hard sided and uniform depth.
For ease of construction and to ensure that the vegetation has adequate space, cells should be no narrower than 0.6 m at any point.
The maximum width of a facility is determined by the reach of the construction machinery, which must not be tracked into the cell.
  • Setback from Buildings: A typical four (4) metre setback is recommended from building foundations. If an impermeable liner is used, no setback is needed.
  • Proximity to Underground Utilities and Overhead wires - consult with local utility companies regards to horizontal and vertical clearance required between storm drains, ditches, and surface water bodies. Further, check whether the future tree canopy height in the bioretention area will not interfere with existing overhead wires

The principles of bioretention can be applied in any scenario where planting or vegetation would normally be found.

Private sites

In single family residential sites rain gardens most often take the form of a soft edged, traditional perennial planting bed. As many private industrial, commercial and institutional sites have landscaping around their parking lots, Bioretention: Parking lots is an increasingly popular choice to manage stormwater.

Streetscape

Bioretention is a popular choice for making urban green space work harder. Design configurations include extending the cells to accommodate shade trees, and using retrofit opportunities to create complete streets with traffic calming and curb extensions or 'bump outs'. See Bioretention: Streetscapes

Parkland and natural areas

Naturalized landscaping and soft edges can make a bioretention facility 'disappear' into green space surroundings. In some scenarios, a larger bioretention (50 - 800 m2) cell may be used as an end-of-pipe facility treating both sheet flow and concentrated flow before it enters an adjacent water course. In these larger installations care must be made in the design to distribute the inflow, preventing erosion and maximizing infiltration.

Design

Optimizing bioretention for water quality
Poor design choice:
Limits outflow water quality
Better design choice:
Improves outflow water quality
Single large cell design Several smaller distributed cells
Single concentrated inflow Forebays or distributed flow
No pretreatment Pretreatment provided as part of treatment train design
Over-sized underdrain Moderately sized underdrain (or no underdrain)
Filter bed < 0.5 m Filter bed > 0.75 m
Filter media Phosphorus > 30 ppm Filter media Phosphorus < 30 ppm
Filter media predominantly sand Filter media contains fractions of fines and organic material in sand
Surface covered with stone (or uncovered) Surface covered with mulch and dense vegetation

Sizing and Modelling

Bioretention facilities should be sized to accommodate runoff from approximately 10 to 20 times the footprint area of the facility. i.e. they should have an I/P ratio of 10 to 20. When the drainage area is too large, silt can accumulate very rapidly, overwhelm the pretreatment devices, and lead to clogging of the facility. When the drainage area is relatively small compared to a bioretention facility, it can make the facility appear unreasonably costly.

Inlets and pretreatment options

Options for pretreatment include:

Simple (non-treating) inlets include:

  • Sheet flow from a depressed curb
  • One of more curb cuts
  • Covered drains

Overflow routing

Conceptual diagram of the excess routing alternatives: On the left, excess flow leaves the cell via an overflow; on the right, excess flow is diverted so that only the design volume enters the cell.

Routing

  • Infiltration facilities can be designed to be inline or offline from the drainage system. See Inlets
  • Inline facilities accept all of the flow from a drainage area and convey larger event flows through an overflow outlet. The overflow must be sized to safely convey larger storm events out of the facility.
  • The overflow must be situated at the far end of the facility to prevent any localised ponding to cause bypassing of the infiltration facility.
  • Offline facilities use flow splitters or bypass channels that only allow the required water quality storage volume to enter the facility.
Higher flows are diverted and do not enter the infiltration practice. A pipe can by used for this, but a weir or curb cut minimizes clogging and reduces the maintenance frequency.

Overflow elevation

The invert of the overflow should be placed at the maximum water surface elevation of the practice. i.e. the maximum ponding depth. A good starting point is around 300 mm over the surface of the practice. However, consideration should be given to public safety and drainage time|time for the ponded water to drain. See Bioretention and Stormwater planters

Freeboard

  • In swales convey flowing water a freeboard of 300 mm is generally accepted as a good starting point.
  • In bioretention the freeboard is being defined as the depth between the invert of the overflow and the the inlet 150 mm would suffice, so long as the inlet will not become inundated during design storm conditions.
  • In above grade stormwater planters above grade, the equivalent dimension would be the depth between the invert of the overflow and the lip of the planter (150 mm minimum)
  • Where the stormwater planter is configured more like a lined/non-infiltrating bioretention system, the inlet will be the depth to which this is measured, as above (150 mm minimum).

Options

Metal grates are recommended (over plastic) in all situations.

Feature Anti Vandalism/Robust Lower Cost Option Self cleaning
Dome grate x
Flat grate x
Catch basin x
Ditch inlet catch basin x x
Curb cut x x x

Gallery

Plant Selection

The nature of bioretention cells is to attenuate stormwater from rainfall events of varying intensities. For this reason, the vegetation used must be suitable for the varying moisture conditions and is often categorized into three zones related to the grading of the feature.

  1. Low Zone -- This area is frequently inundated during storm events, and is well-drained between rainfall events.
    • Mineral Meadow Marsh plant community
    • Grasses, Sedges, rushes, wildflowers, ferns and shrubs that have an ‘Obligate’ to ‘Facultative’ designation
    • Wetland ‘Obligate’ species that are flood tolerant as they will persist in average years and flourish in wetter years.
    • Plants that are likely to occur in wetlands or adjacent to wetlands.
    • Plants with dense root structure and /or vegetative cover are favoured for their ability to act as pollution filters and tendency to slow water velocity
    • Be advised these practices are not constructed wetlands and are designed to fully drain within 48 hours.
  2. Mid Zone -- This zone is inundated less frequently (2 – 100 year storm events) and has periodically high levels of moisture in the soil. The ecology of this zone is a transition from the Mineral Meadow Marsh/Beach-type community to an upland community.
    • Plants able to survive in soils that are seasonally saturated, yet can also tolerate periodic drought.
    • Species include grasses and groundcovers, as well as low shrub species.
  3. High Zone -- The ecology of this zone is terrestrial due to its elevation in relation to the filter bed. The zone most closely resembles a Cultural Meadow or a Cultural Thicket community, depending on the mix of grasses, herbaceous material, shrubs and trees utilized.
    • Plants should have deep roots for structure, be drought-tolerant and capable of withstanding occasional soil saturation.
    • Trees and large shrubs planted in this zone will aid in the infiltration and absorption of stormwater.
    • This area can be considered a transition area into other landscape or site areas.
    • A variety (min. five) species should be used to prevent a monoculture.

Exposure to roadway or parking lot runoff must be considered.

  1. Exposure to roadway or parking lot runoff
    • Select salt tolerant grasses, other herbaceous material and shrubs.
    • These can take on several forms, including parking lot islands, traffic islands, roundabouts, or cul-de-sacs and are often used as snow storage locations.
  2. No exposure to roadway or parking lot runoff
    • Practices allow for a greater range of species selection.
    • These receive runoff from rooftops or areas that use no deicing salt and have low pollutant exposure, such as courtyard bioretention.

Other selection factors:

  • Most bioretention cells will be situated to receive full sun exposure. The ‘Exposure’ column in the master plant list identifies the sun exposure condition for each species.
  • Facilities with a deeper media bed (greater than 1 m) provide the opportunity for a wider range of plant species (including trees).
  • The inclusion of vegetation with a variety of moisture tolerances ensures that the bioretention cell will adapt to a variety of weather conditions.
  • Proper spacing must be provided for above-ground and below-ground utilities, and adjacent infrastructure.
  • Where possible, a combination of native trees, shrubs, and perennial herbaceous materials should be used.
  • A planting mix with evergreen and woody plants will provide appealing textures and colors year round, but they may not be appropriate for snow storage areas.
  • In areas where less maintenance will be provided and where trash accumulation in shrubbery or herbaceous plants is a concern, consider a “turf and trees” landscaping model.
  • If trees are to be used, or the bioretention is located in a shaded location, then ensure that the chosen herbaceous plants are shade tolerant.
  • Spaces for herbaceous flowering plants can be included. This may be attractive at a community entrance location or in a residential rain garden.


Tables for identifying ideal species for bioretention are found in the Plant lists. See plant selection and planting design for supporting advice.

See also

External links