2,683
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 185:
Line 185: − + Line 193:
Line 193: − +
→Water Balance
The key hydrologic benefit which green roofs have over other forms of LID is the proportion of the water returned to the atmosphere through [[Evapotranspiration| evapotranspiration]].
The key hydrologic benefit which green roofs have over other forms of LID is the proportion of the water returned to the atmosphere through [[Evapotranspiration| evapotranspiration]].
*In Southern Ontario rainwater retention of extensive green roofs without irrigation is between 57% and 70%<ref>Liu, M. Minor, J. 2005. Performance evaluation of an extensive green roof. National Research Council of Canada. NRCC-48204 https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2013/03/NRC_EastviewGRrept.pdf</ref> <ref name=VS>Van Seters, T., Rocha, L., Smith, D., MacMillan, G. 2009. Evaluation of Green Roofs for Runoff Retention, Runoff Quality, and Leachability, Vol. 44 (1): 33 - 47 (2009). Innovative Approaches to Stormwater Management in Canada</ref> <ref name=Hill>Hill J, Drake J, Sleep B, Margolis L. Influences of Four Extensive Green Roof Design Variables on Stormwater Hydrology. J Hydrol Eng. 2017;22(8):04017019. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001534</ref>.
*In Southern Ontario rainwater retention of extensive green roofs without irrigation is between 57% and 70%<ref>Liu, M. Minor, J. 2005. Performance evaluation of an extensive green roof. National Research Council of Canada. NRCC-48204 https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2013/03/NRC_EastviewGRrept.pdf</ref> <ref name=VS>Van Seters, T., Rocha, L., Smith, D., MacMillan, G. 2009. Evaluation of Green Roofs for Runoff Retention, Runoff Quality, and Leachability, Vol. 44 (1): 33 - 47 (2009). Innovative Approaches to Stormwater Management in Canada https://www.cawq.ca/cgi-bin/journal/abstract.cgi?language=english&pk_article=412</ref> <ref name=Hill>Hill J, Drake J, Sleep B, Margolis L. Influences of Four Extensive Green Roof Design Variables on Stormwater Hydrology. J Hydrol Eng. 2017;22(8):04017019. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001534</ref>.
*Including winter periods with snow accumulation and thaw, the annual retention of extensive green roofs is around 50% <ref name=VS/><ref name=Hill/>.
*Including winter periods with snow accumulation and thaw, the annual retention of extensive green roofs is around 50% <ref name=VS/><ref name=Hill/>.
*Using a compost based planting medium improves retention by around 10% (i.e., 60% for compost compared to 50% for granular).
*Using a compost based planting medium improves retention by around 10% (i.e., 60% for compost compared to 50% for granular).
Fassman-Beck, E., Hunt, W., P.E. Robert Berghage, R., Donald Carpenter, D., Kurtz, T., Stovin, V., Wadzuk, B. 2016. Curve Number and Runoff Coefficients for Extensive Living Roofs. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. Vol.21. Issue 3. ASCE. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001318</ref> <ref name=Hill/>.
Fassman-Beck, E., Hunt, W., P.E. Robert Berghage, R., Donald Carpenter, D., Kurtz, T., Stovin, V., Wadzuk, B. 2016. Curve Number and Runoff Coefficients for Extensive Living Roofs. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. Vol.21. Issue 3. ASCE. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001318</ref> <ref name=Hill/>.
In a study to investigate how green roof runoff reduction performance is affected by climate, Talebi et al. (2019) used water balance and evapotranspiration models to simulate runoff produced by green roofs in six Canadian cities (Vancouver, Calgary, Regina, Toronto, London and Halifax). Results showed that predicted runoff reduction performance varied from 17% to 50% for low water use plants. The best performance was predicted to occur in Regina and Calgary (drier climates), while the poorest performance was predicted for Halifax and Vancouver (wetter climates). Average annual runoff reduction was highest in Toronto and London and lowest in Vancouver.<ref>Talebi, A., Bagg, S., Sleep, B.S., O'Carroll, D.M. 2019. Water retention performance of green roof technology: A comparison of Canadian climates. Ecological Engineering, 126, (2019), 1-15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925857418303835?via%3Dihub</ref>
In a study to investigate how green roof runoff reduction performance is affected by climate, Talebi et al. (2019) used water balance and evapotranspiration models to simulate runoff produced by green roofs in six Canadian cities (Vancouver, Calgary, Regina, Toronto, London and Halifax). Results showed that predicted runoff reduction performance varied from 17% to 50% for low water use plants. The best performance was predicted to occur in Regina and Calgary (drier climates), while the poorest performance was predicted for Halifax and Vancouver (wetter climates). Average annual runoff reduction was highest in Toronto and London and lowest in Vancouver.<ref>Talebi, A., Bagg, S., Sleep, B.S., O'Carroll, D.M. 2019. Water retention performance of green roof technology: A comparison of Canadian climates. Ecological Engineering, 126, (2019), 1-15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925857418303835?via%3Dihub</ref>
===Water Quality===
===Water Quality===